A troika of catastrophic cabinet picks

I have to agree with Martin Longman’s analysis at the Political Animal blog on Trump’s initial cabinet picks. Trump Makes Three Catastrophic Picks:

[Donald Trump] announced Mike Flynn as his National Security Advisor, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III as his Attorney General and Rep. Mike Pompeo of Kansas as his director of Central Intelligence. All three are mind-bogglingly disastrous choices, so how can you give all of them the attention they deserve?

Screen Shot 2016-11-22 at 3.13.04 PM

Let me just give the briefest sketch of my problems with these three appointments.

To put it bluntly, I think Mike Flynn’s relationship to Vladimir Putin needs to be examined very, very closely. But what makes me sick to my stomach is that the position of National Security Advisor does not require Senate confirmation. To begin to understand my concerns about Flynn, you should start by reading a Politico Magazine article by Michael Crowley from their May/June 2016 issue. The short version is that Flynn was fired as the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency and then wound up eighteen months later sitting two seats from Putin at the 10-year anniversary gala for RT, the Russian’s state-propaganda news network. He then began making (presumably paid) appearances on the network where he took a line that was very pleasing to Putin.

The American intelligence community was not impressed:

Michael Flynn, now a private citizen after a reportedly disgruntled retirement, was not there to gather intelligence. His attendance at the RT gala, before which he also gave a talk on world affairs, appeared to inaugurate a relationship with the network—presumably a paid one, though neither Flynn nor RT answered queries on the subject. Flynn now makes semi-regular appearances on RT as an analyst, in which he often argues that the U.S. and Russia should be working more closely together on issues like fighting ISIL and ending Syria’s civil war. “Russia has its own national security strategy, and we have to respect that,” he said in one recent appearance. “And we have to try to figure out: How do we combine the United States’ national security strategy along with Russia’s national security strategy, despite all the challenges that we face?”

At a moment of semi-hostility between the U.S. and Russia, the presence of such an important figure at Putin’s table startled current and former members of the Obama administration. “It was extremely odd that he showed up in a tuxedo to the Russian government propaganda arm’s party,” one former Pentagon official told me.

It’s not usually to America’s benefit when our intelligence officers—current or former—seek refuge in Moscow,” said one senior Obama administration official.

Those officials were being diplomatic. Perhaps Crowley put it more plainly when he wrote: “Seated next to [RT’s 36-year-old editor-in-chief, Margarita] Simonyan at the dinner and just two seats away from Putin himself was perhaps the most intriguing example of how the Russians have gone about recruiting disaffected members of that establishment…”

In a future post I may detail all the other signs that the Trump campaign is essentially “captured” by the Kremlin, but they obviously include the employment of campaign chairman Paul Manafort, the suspected secret server connection between Trump’s offices and a Kremlin-connected Russian bank [see Slate, Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?], and the penetration of the Democratic National Headquarters, hacking of John Podesta’s email account, and selective divulgence of embarrassing emails by WikiLeaks.

Having Mike Flynn inside the White House at the right hand of the president is a clear national security risk, and it’s not paranoid to say this out loud, and with some volume.

The New York Times editorialized, Michael Flynn: An Alarming Pick for National Security Adviser. The Washington Post editorialized, Trump has made some dangerous appointments with the choices of retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn as national security adviser and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) as director of the CIA.

With Sen. Jeff Sessions, I don’t even know where to begin. So, I’ll refer you to something I wrote about him in January 2014.

In 1986 (otherwise known as the year of Iran-Contra), President Ronald Reagan nominated Beauregard the Third to serve as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. During the Judiciary Committee hearings on his nomination, it became clear that Sessions suffered from a common conservative fear: namely, mouth-rape.

Like so many of his Republican brethren, Sessions was terrified of having things “rammed down his throat” by the NAACP, ACLU, or some “un-American” and “Communist-inspired” guy who might decide to attack his home with a small arsenal.

When it became clear that Jefferson Beauregard the Third was not only named for the president of the Confederacy and one its more more effective generals, but actually held the same beliefs in common with those two gentlemen, the Judiciary Committee declined to send his nomination to the floor. Alabama Senator Howell Heflin decided that Sessions was simply too racist to serve on the bench in Alabama, and so Reagan had to go back to the drawing board.

But being too racist to serve as district judge is not the same thing as being too racist to serve in the U.S. Senate, and Sessions got his revenge…

…he serves as the Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts.

Because, GOP.

The idea that Jeff Sessions might be our Attorney General is as fearsome as it is despicable. But detailing all my concerns will have to wait for another time.

The New York Times editorialized, Jeff Sessions as Attorney General: An Insult to Justice. The Washington Post editorialized, What Jeff Sessions has to Prove. The Huffington Post examined Sessions’ past. Jeff Sessions Was Deemed Too Racist To Be A Federal Judge. He’ll Now Be Trump’s Attorney General.

As for Rep. Mike Pompeo, he has some things to recommend him. He finished first in his class at West Point and served as an editor on the Harvard Law Review. He used his undergrad degree in Mechanical Engineering to launch a successful aerospace company before moving on to oilfield equipment. But he’s a Tea Party member, a climate science denier, and an extreme anti-choicer who doesn’t support rape/incest exceptions. He thinks Edward Snowden should be executed. He thinks the people at Guantanamo Bay look “well-fed” and are well treated. He’s a Benghazi! nutcase and he’s a fanatical opponent of the nuclear agreement with Iran. He’s been denounced by the The Council on American-Islamic Relations for saying Islamophobic things on the House floor. What unites him with Mike Flynn is his outrage about Obama’s firing of Gen. Stanley McCrystal for disloyalty.

This troika of appointments is beyond troubling. Collectively, they are catastrophic.

Agreed.

UPDATE: Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn began receiving classified national security briefings last summer while he was also running HIS private consulting firm, the Flynn Intel Group, that offered “all-source intelligence support” to international clients. Michael Flynn, Trump’s reported pick for national security adviser, sat in on intel briefings — while advising foreign clients.“This is profoundly troubling and should be disqualifying,” said Norm Eisen, who served as President Obama’s ethics adviser and later as an ambassador to the Czech Republic. He predicted that if Flynn is named as Trump’s national security adviser, “there will be wholesale resignations of national security professionals, and I believe some have already drafted their resignation letters.”

18 responses to “A troika of catastrophic cabinet picks

  1. Trump’s tax plan: massive cuts for the 1% will usher ‘era of dynastic wealth’

    Wednesday 23 November 2016 07.00 EST

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/trump-tax-plan-cuts-wealthy-low-income-inequality

    • I suppose all the “trickle down” will be bring all those good paying manufacturing jobs back to Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio (when donkeys fly).

    • Nate Silver disagrees about hackers…

      Hackers stole the election from Hillary Clinton? Nate Silver provides a reality check

      By Douglas Perry | The Oregonian/OregonLive
      on November 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, updated

      http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/11/hackers_stole_the_election_fro.html

      • It is reassuring to know there are common sensical people like Nate Silvers around to try and calm the irrational hysteria that has gripped the left since the election. I doubt he will calm them much but at least he is a ray of hope that they will eventually realize what is done is done and start planning for the next election rather than plotting desparate schemes to undo the last one.

    • Yet another opinion…

      HACKED OR NOT, AUDIT THIS ELECTION (AND ALL FUTURE ONES)
      AUTHOR: ANDY GREENBERG. SECURITY DATE OF PUBLICATION: 11.23.16.
      TIME OF PUBLICATION: 3:06 PM.

      https://www.wired.com/2016/11/hacked-not-audit-election-rest/

      • Pure hysteria, dripping with desperation and served up with a dash of craziness. I swear this election has genuinely pushed some people over the edge. This guy is basically saying he doesn’t care if there is evidence of anything wrong or not, he wants it investigated and recounted just in case it might turn in Hillary’s favor. Like I said: hysteria + desperation + craziness. I hope he gets better…

        • Frances Perkins

          Sort of like the bus loads of illegal immigrants voting hysteria used by the right to justify “voter fraud ” laws.

          • Oh, I don’t think there was any hysteria involved. It was calmly reasoned out and the law was calmly passed. Easy-Peasy…

          • For Sure Not Tom

            A story about a van full of immigrants driving around voting at multiple locations, including a photo of said van and immigrants, went around the right wing “news” websites and chain emails.

            They said the story was from Phoenix Fox 10. Of course, no such story was on Phoenix Fox 10 or their website, something anyone with a web browser could have fact checked themselves.

            But once the racist toothpaste is out of the tube…

            Funny how conservatives said a Clinton win was proof of a rigged system, and Blood of Tyrants…Tree of Freedom…Take Back Our Country….blah blah blah…

            But if a Democrat says, “Hey, something looks odd, mind if we double check?” they’re being hysterical.

  2. November 22, 2016 6:01 p.m.
    Experts Urge Clinton Campaign to Challenge Election Results in 3 Swing States

    By Gabriel Sherman

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html

  3. Frances Perkins

    Down 1.7 million and counting.

  4. You see, this is what I am talking about…you can not only attack Trump, you can attack everyone near him. Aren’t you even a little happy Trump was elected since it provides you with such easy targets for your pen?

    Here is a “heads up” on a story that I suspect you may have heard about, but if you didn’t, here goes: Trump said he wants to decide what to do with the Executive Orders his first few days as President. To that end, he is having his Staff review all the Executive Orders currently in effect so he can decide which should stay and which ones should go.

    Now that will be interesting to watch…