Apparently, the “patronage” job is alive and well in Arizona

By Craig McDermott, cross-posted from Random Musings

And so is “shameless hypocrisy”

From AP, via KTVK (Phoenix channel 3), written by Bob Christie (emphasis added) –

Former Arizona Senate President Russell Pearce has been offered a job with the Maricopa County Treasurer’s office overseeing the agency’s technical services department, but he may not take the job right away because he’s too busy.

The Republican is a contentious figure in Arizona because he authored a series of laws that cracked down on people in the country illegally, including Senate Bill 1070. He became the only state legislator ever recalled from office by state voters in 2011.

Pearce said Monday that he wasn’t looking for a job but is considering the offer from Treasurer Charles “Hos” Hoskins to oversee the department’s human resources, legislative outreach, budget and senior citizen outreach. He’s not sure if he’ll take the position because he’s too busy at the moment, Pearce said.

The job, assuming that Pearce accepts it (prediction: he will, but may wait until the furor dies down before formally accepting the job.  As the lege isn’t in session, there probably isn’t much pressure on that front) will officially be about lobbying for Charles Hoskins, Maricopa County Treasurer.

However, Hoskins is a political ally of Pearce’s friend and patron, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and it would be the epitome of obvious patronage for Arpaio to give Pearce a job himself.

This looks like a “wink and a nod” arrangement, but it gives Arpaio and Pearce a patina of plausible deniability.

And the “hypocrisy” part?

Pearce, the future public agency lobbyist, is a past (very vocal) critic of, you guessed it, public agency lobbyists.

But he balances that with a deep affection for (deep-pocketed) private lobbyists.

5 responses to “Apparently, the “patronage” job is alive and well in Arizona

  1. Frances Perkins

    What the hell does a County Treasurer need a lobbyist for? They make no policy. But I am sure they can lobby to get their pals land valuation lowered by the assessor, or have the ratio changed to agriculture.

  2. AND the job pays $85,000. Talk about your government handouts!

  3. I do not want my tax money paying a person of Pearce’s background. Since when do we hire those who were impeached and so racist??? Was this job advertised??? I have serious reservations about this hire and so do many others both Republicans and Democrats.
    Thank you,
    Pat

  4. What are the hiring practices for this position. Was the position advertised? Were there other candidates? Was there an interview?
    Is their a job requirements list? Does the Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office have to follow EEOC rules for hiring?