Obama tax plan vs. extending the Bush tax cuts for the “two percenters”

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

In case you missed this report last week, GOP plan to extend tax cuts for rich adds $36 billion to deficit, panel finds:

A Republican plan to extend tax cuts for the rich would add more than $36 billion to the federal deficit next year — and transfer the bulk of that cash into the pockets of the nation's millionaires, according to a congressional analysis released Wednesday.

New data from the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation show that households earning more than $1 million a year would reap nearly $31 billion in tax breaks under the GOP plan in 2011, for an average tax cut per household of about $100,000.

The analysis, requested by Democrats on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, comes as debate heats up over tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration, most of which are scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Republicans want to extend all the cuts, which would cost the Treasury Department $238 billion in 2011, according to the taxation committee. President Obama and congressional Democrats have vowed to extend the cuts only for families making less than $250,000 a year and individuals making less than $200,000 — 98 percent of American taxpayers — in a plan that would add about $202 billion to next year's deficit.

Given the soaring national debt, many economists deem both proposals unaffordable. Even some Republicans, including Reagan administration budget chief David Stockman and former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, have urged lawmakers to let them expire and allow income tax rates to pop back up to their levels during the Clinton administration.

Obama campaigned on a pledge not to raise taxes for the middle class, however…

* * *

[L]awmakers are gearing up for a battle when they return to Washington in September over the small fraction of the tax breaks that benefit the nation's richest families.

Both sides are eager to engage that fight on the eve of the election. Democrats see a political advantage in accusing Republicans of holding tax breaks for the middle class "hostage" in order to get tax cuts for the wealthy, though it's not clear that GOP lawmakers would in fact block extension of the middle-class cuts if they were offered alone.

Republicans accuse Democrats of plotting one of the biggest tax hikes in American history, arguing that raising taxes on wealthy households would punish the very people capable of creating jobs, spurring economic growth and reducing the 9.5 percent unemployment rate.

[Fact Check:The Bush tax cuts contained a "sunset" clause to expire automatically after 10 years. This gimmick was included in the bill to get around using the reconciliation rules to pass the Bush tax cuts. This does not constitute a "tax hike" — it is the "sunsetting" or expiration of tax cuts. The GOP's "Gimmicks-R-Us" shop created this Rube Goldberg contraption that is coming back to bite them. The GOP owns it.

The Bush tax cuts, the largest tax cuts in history, failed to produce a single net new job over the course of the "lost decade" (1999-2009). The 3 million jobs created under Bush, the worst job growth under any president since Herbert Hoover, were entirely wiped out at the end of his administration with the Bush Great Recession. The Bush tax cuts only led to the banksters of Wall Street and the investor class enriching themselves by gambling the money on the casino capitalism of Wall Street. The money was not used to invest in business or to create new jobs. Even now with a modest recovery, corporations are hoarding profits and not expanding business or hiring back employees laid off during the Bush Great Recession. The Republican argument for tax cuts for the rich is without merit. The marginal tax rate would simply return to what it was under President Clinton, the go-go years of economic expansion.]

About half of all small-business income is reported on the individual returns of people making over $250,000 a year, according to the taxation committee's data, though those taxpayers represent only about 3 percent of small businesses.

* * *

Democrats counter that wealthy households would receive a tax benefit under their plan. The joint committee analysis shows that million-dollar households would continue to receive an average tax break of about $6,300 next year compared with full repeal — significantly more than the average break of about $1,100 that would go to families making less than $200,000 a year, according to the taxation committee.

You can see from the chart below that only those earning more than $500,000 are significantly affected by the Obama tax plan — the "two percenters." How much of a stake do corporate CEOs and the investor class need to gamble on the casino capitalism of Wall Street to make "money for nothing, and get their checks for free"? God knows they are not making capital investments in buildings and machinery and hiring employees.

h/t Ezra Klein

GR2010081106717-thumb-454x592-23659