The anti-government Tea-Publican strategy of ‘damaging the brand’

Tea-Publicans love to quote Ronald Reagan’s anti-government smear, the nine most terrifying words : “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help.”

American satirist P.J. O’ Rourke clarified the problem well when he said that “Republicans are the party that says government doesn’t work, and then they get elected and prove it.”

Screenshot-9Boy howdy, do they ever! Their strategy is to make such a mess of government that people lose all confidence in government (and other public institutions). A Gallup poll, Confidence in U.S. Institutions Still Below Historical norms (June 2015), found that already low confidence in our system of government, our economy, the media, banking, big business, religious institutions and watchdogs was further eroding.

From a broad perspective, Americans’ confidence in all institutions over the last two years has been the lowest since Gallup began systematic updates of a larger set of institutions in 1993.

Tea-Publicans believe that by making government not work, voters will reward them for being the Cassandra who prophesied that “government does not work.”

(They of course have no plan to “fix” government to make it work more effectively or efficiently. That’s not their objective.)

Unfortunately, this evil plan has worked like a charm. Voters are simply too ignorant or disengaged from politics, or too discouraged with a broken system to vote and to hold those responsible accountable.

This anti-government sentiment is strongest among the so-called Tea Party types. Which brings me to Pima County’s Queen of the Teabaggers, County Supervisor Ally Miller.

Tim Steller of the Arizona Daily Star had an insightful commentary over the weekend. Ally Miller’s Pima County strategy is to “damage the brand”:

AllyMillerI have appreciated the best of what Ally Miller has brought to the board in her stormy first three years after replacing Ann Day: Skepticism about business as usual in Pima County government. The latest example, of course, is her valid questioning of the plan to build a headquarters for World View Enterprises in a county-funded incentive deal that would be paid back in 20 years.

[A business only made possible in a bill sponsored by former Rep. Ethan Orr (R-Tucson). Ethan Orr’s special interest bill for space tourism.]

But the problem is her healthy skepticism comes wrapped in unhealthy cynicism, self-centeredness and paranoia that I think would make a Miller-run county board disastrous.

Consider the phrase “damaging the brand.” I learned of this phrase recently and it helped me understand previously incomprehensible aspects of Miller’s years — mainly, why she makes so many whacky accusations along with the handful of pointed, accurate ones. In other words, why she’s so consistently negative about Pima County.

It’s all about damaging the brand. The brand, in this phrase, is the county government in all its aspects. And the idea is that if she can adequately damage the county’s image, voters will push out the board majority and longtime administrator Chuck Huckelberry with them.

Here’s the first sentence of an email Miller wrote to fellow opponents of November’s bond elections soon after those ballot issues lost.

“I’m still not sure they realize I have been setting the table for 3 years damaging their brand and setting the table for 2016,” she wrote Nov. 6. “I thought they were beginning to figure that o [sic] … but it is good they seem to be oblivious.”

I asked Jeannie Davis, whom Miller fired as chief of staff in late December, if “damaging the brand” was a phrase and concept used during her 21 months in the office. She confirmed that but would not elaborate[.]

* * *

Former Miller aide Joe Cuffari didn’t know the phrase “damaging the brand,” but when I spoke with him last week, he said the concept was very familiar.

“The idea was there of ‘Let’s not work for the constituents, but let’s try to bring Pima County down,’” he said. “Her agenda was just to get herself re-elected and get the other supervisors out.”

* * *

[Miller] has made accusations that caused some damage, and when they were proved groundless, simply moved on to the next accusation.

When I talked to him Friday, [Supervisor Ray] Carroll put it this way: “She might have 100 conspiracies that she’s thinking exist, but only one in 100 actually exists.”

One trait common to all Teabaggers is their love of conspiracy theories. They keep conspiracy mongers like World Net Daily, Breitbart.com and Info Wars, just to name a few, in business. It’s all a government conspiracy, dontcha know! Ally Miller should star in an episode of the new X Files.

One of my favorite conspiracies has been Miller’s repeated contention that Raytheon Missile Systems does not actually want the buffer zone that the county created through re-routing a road and buying property near the company’s plant. The idea was to give the company room to expand so any future growth would not go out of state, as the last big project did.

Miller said this in 2014 but has made similar comments a refrain whenever Raytheon comes up: “As a voting member of this board, one would think that the Raytheon members who want this road moved so badly would have contacted me directly.”

But some accusations have gone further: Twice Miller has taken accusations of wrongdoing by fellow board members to the Arizona Attorney General’s Office for investigation. And twice, the Republican-run AG’s office has said, “No thanks.”

Some of those employed by Miller’s office describe an erratic atmosphere. One moment, Miller would be happily working with the staff, the next minute, yelling at them and slamming doors.

“It was a tough environment,” Cuffari said. “You never knew what you were going to get.”

Cuffari said he worked with Miller for 45 minutes one morning, then a while later, she told him he was fired.

The turnover in her office has been astounding. As Carroll put it: “I’ve had less employees in 20 years than she’s had in three.”

* * *

Sergio Mendez and others reported much of the work of the office consisted of going line-by-line through Chuck Huckelberry’s memos, budget documents and county-board agendas. The accusations that those searches produced have been the substance of Miller’s tenure, allowing her to pursue a “damage the brand” approach.

Another of Miller’s supporters, Gini Crawford, received the post-bond-election email and didn’t understand that reference to brand-damaging, but she does think the county has an image problem.

The difference between Crawford’s view and mine is that she sees the problem as strictly the county’s making.

* * *

Crawford said Closen, Kim DeMarco, who is challenging Bronson, and Richard Hernandez, who is challenging Ramon Valadez, don’t plan on running as a slate, but they are loose allies.

All it would take is two of those three challengers winning, along with a Miller victory to turn “damaging the brand” into something more consequential — undermining the operation of our local government.

The so-called Tea Party is an anti-government insurrection with a design on anarchy. Being anti-government, they have no interest in making government work more effectively or efficiently. That would undermine their bumper sticker politics of “government does not work” and the very reason for their existence.

8 responses to “The anti-government Tea-Publican strategy of ‘damaging the brand’

  1. captain*arizona

    herr huppenthal tucson is run by good government white elitist liberals who republicans use for a punching bag. latinos will deal with your kind when they take over tucson from the gringos then phoenix and finally arizona. every day in arizona 100 latino kids turn 18 if you add in dreamers its 140 a day and almost everyone of them hating republicans as much as I do. also 20to 25 republicans die each day. every day we get stronger you get weaker. as the kleons say revenge is a dish best eaten cold. you have no answer for this but give it a try it might be amusing. every day ciccero got up in the roman senate and said carthage must be destroyed. we need democrats to stand up in the state house and senate and say every day you will be brought to justice for what you have done. and young latino school children should surround the the state capital and be told these are the people in here who need to be brought to justice! sort of a field trip to the state capital.

    • John Huppenthal

      A sneer and scorn aren’t evidence. When Hispanic students from poor neighborhoods have lower academic gains at a much higher cost, that is evidence.

      • captain*arizona

        you see herr huppenthal as no answer to the demographic death sentence to the republican party. the democratic party should be publicly checking out sites for re-education camps for recidivist republicans. such as sun city republicans go here and east mesa republicans go there and day camp to democrats who try to appeal to republicans.

  2. john Huppenthal

    Which government do democrats control? Tucson. Which school district? Tucson Unified. Tucson exudes disrespect for the poor. Drive any poor neighborhood and the decades lack of pavement maintenance just leaps at you. TUSD is 50,000 per classroom moreexpensive than vail and their academic gains are decisively lower on an apples to apples basis comparison. That 50,000 layer of taxation is devastating to job creation.
    These twin failures are why pima county has fallen so far behind maricopa county. Success in the public sector is a grinding challenge requiring intense leadership on a daily basis coupledwith a profound kmowledge of the entrrprise and an extremely frugal mindset. Once you think that more money can solve problems, you arent in the game.

    • I work in corporate America, and if you think the private sector isn’t rife with waste, fraud, abuse, and just plain criminal activity, then you’re naive.

      Once you start thinking that a profit motive solves everything, you aren’t in the game.

      Go Falcon9, hero of the internets!

      • Liberal Logic: If you can’t refute what was said, refute what wasn’t said.

        • Falcon9 said that “Once you think that more money can solve problems, you aren’t in the game” and had a mini rant about the public sector being a grind.

          I replied that the private sector is no better. Huppenthal is a known supporter of giving my tax dollars to New York hedge fund managers via charter schools. You know this, I’m sure.

          NidanGoju, you have accused me of the very sin you have committed.

          • Maybe you have a comprehension issue Tom.

            Mr. Huppenthal’s comment was specific to the public sector. He made NO mention, pro or con, of the “private sector” nor “profit motive”. Therefore, your response disparaging both was not germane to either his comment nor to the subject of AzBlue’s original post.