Oh for the love of God, are we really going to do this again?
Just in time for Christmas, our white nationalist racist-in-chief is threatening a government shutdown over his “big beautiful wall” on the Mexico border.
Someone just give him a MAGA building blocks set for Christmas to occupy his infantile mind (yes, this is a real thing) and let’s get on with the serious adult business of running the federal government.
POLITICO reports Stalemate on Trump’s wall amid threat of shutdown:
Congress just can’t help itself: With a partial government shutdown potentially two weeks away, Democrats and Republicans are dug in, each side upping its demands and vowing not to buckle to the other.
President Donald Trump is pressuring Republicans to obtain at least $5 billion for his border wall, far more than what Senate Democrats are prepared to give. Democrats in turn are considering pushes for legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller and the elimination of a citizenship question from the next census, according to people familiar with the negotiations.
Posted in AZBlueMeanie, Budgets, Congress, Corruption, Crime, Economics, Elections, Ethics, GOP War On..., Immigration, International, Legislation, Mexico Border, Party Politics, personality cult of Trump, President, Racism, Scandals
Tagged extortion, government shutdown, hostages, lame-duck
As other pundits in the national and local media have pointed out, It will be tempting these next several months to focus on the Popular Vote Loser’s (Presidents) tweets, outrageous comments and behavior, and potentially criminal acts that will be adjudicated in the courts.
Now that they will be in control of the House of Representatives, Democrats do have a responsibility to provide oversight of the Executive Branches actions that the Trump (Republican) Party failed to undertake. That is only right and proper.
Democrats and Progressives, in the federal government and in the state government offices they triumphed in, should also take this as an opportunity to advance progressive policies (both incremental and ambitious) that will further attract supporters in the rural, urban, and suburban parts of the country. They should attempt to create bipartisan consensus with the Trump Party but be prepared to fight for and campaign on what the Trumpists obstruct in the Senate and the Oval Office.
Posted in Activism, Arizona Congressional Delegation, Arizona State Legislature, Budgets, Campaigns, Commentary, Community, David Gordon, Debates, Education, Energy, Healthcare, Infrastructure, Initiatives, Legislation, Party Politics, President, Science, Senate, Taxes, Transportation, Veterans, Voting Rights
The Arizona Republic recommends a “no” vote on Prop. 305, the citizens referendum on the “vouchers on steroids” bill passed by the legislature and signed by Governor Ducey, but then blocked by the activism of the citizens of this state. Prop. 305 won’t solve Arizona’s school voucher debate. Here’s what it will do:
Looks are deceiving when it comes to Proposition 305.
But you don’t have to be confused.
The measure amounts to asking voters if Arizona should expand a program that allows parents to take public funding intended to educate their children in K-12 public schools and use it for private school tuition or other educational options.
What does a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote mean?
In 2017, lawmakers and Gov. Doug Ducey approved expanding the voucher program to any K-12 student.
The expansion was put on hold because a public-school advocacy group used an option in the state Constitution to require a public vote before it could go into effect.
The group, Save Our Schools, gathered enough signatures to refer the matter to the voters.
A “no” vote on Prop. 305 represents a rejection of this expansion, maintaining the limited voucher program. A “yes” vote allows the expansion to become law.
Posted in Activism, Arizona State Legislature, AZBlueMeanie, Ballot Referendas and Initiatives, Budgets, Campaigns, Constitution, Corruption, Courts, Editorial, Education, Elections, GOP War On..., Governor, Legislation, Media, Party Politics, Propositions, Scandals, Taxes
Tagged Prop 305, vouchers on steroids
The Arizona Republic today recommends a “no” vote on Prop. 126. If you hate taxes, Prop. 126 is a no-brainer, right? Well, not exactly:
The appeal of Proposition 126 is that it would prohibit imposing a sales tax on services in Arizona.
So, Prop. 126 is a no-brainer then? Far from it.
Why? Because in shielding services from being taxed, the Protect Arizona Taxpayers Act.
It may mean, for instance, a hike in marginal income-tax rates. Or a higher sales tax on goods.
Why nix an important revenue source?
Talk of new revenue took on greater urgency this year following the #RedforEd movement that prompted Gov. Doug Ducey to pledge a 20-percent raise in teacher pay and more money for schools over the next few years. Even with an improved economy, it’s uncertain whether there will be sufficient tax revenue to pay for it all.
The issue gains more relevance now that an education-funding initiative involving raising income taxes on the rich has been knocked off the Nov. 6 ballot.
Posted in AZBlueMeanie, Ballot Referendas and Initiatives, Budgets, Campaigns, Constitution, Economics, Elections, Endorsements, Initiatives, Media, Propositions, Taxes
LD 11 Democratic State Nominee Ralph Atchue
Vince Leach, a person regarded as a reactionary anti-democratic zealot in most state Democratic party circles, has been conveying blatantly false information about his opponent in the race for the LD 11 Senate seat, Ralph Atchue, lying about his positions on border security and taxes on television commercials on CNN and Fox.
Posted in Arizona State Legislature, Budgets, Campaigns, Climate Change, Commentary, Community, David Gordon, Economics, Editorial, Education, Energy, environment, Ethics, Healthcare, Immigration, Infrastructure, Labor, Mexico Border, Party Politics, Political Events, Taxes, Water
Tagged Ralph Atchue, Vince Leach