The wealthy are drinking their own Kool-Aid and force-feeding it to the rest of society. In short, they are waterboarding Americans with their own version of reality.
Their sycophants are mesmerized by the wealth and perceived power of oligarchs and swallow the story, no matter how ludicrous, hoping that some of it will rub off on them. Normal, sane people are resisting the torture.
The Core Players and Their “Antichrist” Obsession
Peter Thiel – He is an early Trump backer, the co-founder of PayPal, and the co-creator of Palantir, which has a $1 Billion contract to deploy artificial intelligence to Homeland Security.
Thiel has spent the past months delivering a series of off-the-record lectures at Viva Technology (VivaTech), an annual technology conference in Paris. His lectures link contemporary geopolitics to a biblical “Antichrist” figure.
In the 23‑slide decks shown to attendees, Thiel argues that the Antichrist exploits existential fears—nuclear war, climate change and AI—to marshal a frightened populace. He repeatedly frames the “end of modernity” as a process already underway, and he cites Greta Thunberg, Bill Gates and other high-profile technologists as possible exemplars of the looming threat.
Elon Musk gives a Nazi salute during his Trump inauguration speech.
Elon Musk – Described in the same lecture series as a “longtime friend and ally” of Thiel, Musk surfaces in a discussion about the Giving Pledge. Thiel recounts urging Musk to withdraw his promise to give away half his fortune, warning that the pledge could funnel billions into “left-wing non-profits” that Musk might later regret.
Musk’s reaction highlighted the mutual awareness of wealth’s leverage over public discourse.
Donald Trump – Thiel is Trump’s most prominent political patron. Trump appears throughout the talks as a foil to the Antichrist narrative. Thiel portrays Trump’s anti-global government stance as a partial bulwark against a one-world order, yet he also admits that even Trump cannot solve “all problems for all time.”
The tension between Trump’s populist appeal and Thiel’s more esoteric theological concerns underscores how wealthy allies can shape and be shaped by each other’s worldviews.
From Theory to a Self-Confirming Loop
The oligarchs’ statements and actions collectively illustrate how the elite’s ideas circulate:
➢ Mimetic Rivalry — The tendency to imitate the desires of the most impressive peers – is drawn from René Girard’s theory. Girard argues that once natural needs are satisfied, humans endlessly copy one another’s aspirations, creating perpetual rivalry.
On its face, Girard’s work is scholarly and well-received; it’s only after Theil distorts it to his own perverted worldview that it becomes a malevolent force, much like Trump’s “framework of a concept,” a word salad with no basis in reality.
Girard’s scholarship is the intellectual scaffolding for Thiel’s claim that “everyone starts to look alike as they converge on a few models.”
➢ Scapegoating & the Antichrist –Thiel repurposes Girard’s “scapegoat mechanism” to label global institutions (the UN, ICC, multinational tech firms) as potential Antichrist agents that manipulate fear to consolidate power—repurposing results in self-serving variations and mutations.
Thiel’s lectures repeatedly link modern regulatory bodies to a biblical archetype of evil. Bottom line: the message is that governance and regulation are bad.
➢ Wealth as Amplifier – Thiel’s ability to fund political campaigns, Palantir contracts, and high-priced lecture tickets demonstrates how financial resources turn private ideas into public spectacles. At this point, the wealthy begin to “drink their own Kool-Aid.
➢ Followers’ Deference – Audience members, journalists and even protestors react less to the substance of the arguments and more to the prestige of the speaker. Some describe the talks as “disjointed” yet remain compelled to attend because of Thiel’s reputation.
Attendee comments — like “I heard more about the Antichrist during those 45 minutes than during the rest of my life” — illustrate this dynamic.
These strands intertwine, forming a Möbius‑strip mental construct: the wealthy elite project a grand narrative, perceive themselves as uniquely qualified to interpret it, and attract listeners whose primary motivation is the patron’s status rather than the argument’s merit. The strip twists back on itself when followers reinterpret the original worldview to suit their own ambitions, producing a “mish-mash of personal wants, needs and desires” that becomes a fragmented, self-referential framework.
The Möbius‑Strip Metaphor in Practice
Self‑Superiority – Thiel, Musk, and Trump each speak as if their visions are universally applicable, yet they acknowledge (sometimes reluctantly) that their own positions are contingent on wealth and influence. Thiel’s claim that the Antichrist “exploits fears… to control a ‘frightened population'” mirrors his own capacity to shape that very fear through high-profile lectures.
Echo Chambers – The audience’s willingness to attend expensive, invitation-only events, despite mixed reactions, creates an echo chamber in which the elite’s ideas are reinforced. The “disjointed” nature of the talks does not deter attendance; instead, the rarity and exclusivity of the experience amplify perceived importance.
Warped Adaptations – Followers reinterpret Thiel’s theological framing to align with their own agendas: some see the Antichrist as a warning against regulation, others as a justification for deregulation, and still others as a rallying cry for nationalist politics. Each adaptation bends the original narrative, yet all remain tethered to the same core premise—wealth grants the authority to define reality.
Infinite Loop – Because the worldview is constructed and validated within the same privileged circle, it never encounters an external corrective force. The Möbius strip’s single surface symbolizes how the elite’s perception of superiority loops back onto itself, perpetually sustaining the belief that they alone can dictate the shape of the world.
A Self-Reinforcing Elite Imagination
The synthesis of the articles reveals a striking pattern: when immense wealth couples with the ability to sell grand ideas, the originators begin to hallucinate a universal superiority that extends beyond economics into morality, theology, and geopolitics.
Their followers, drawn by the allure of status and the promise of influence, listen not because the arguments are compelling but because the speakers wield money. Over time, each participant reshapes the original, already distorted, worldview to fit personal ambitions, producing a tangled, self-reinforcing tapestry that exists only in the minds of its creators—a Möbius strip of elite imagination.
By weaving together recent reports of Peter Thiel’s public lectures, the intellectual background of Thiel’s circle, and the broader media coverage of Thiel’s circle, a picture emerges of a self-reinforcing elite imagination. In this vision, wealth-enabled entrepreneurs and political allies sell grand narratives, begin to see themselves as superior in every domain, and draw followers who listen primarily because of their patrons’ financial clout. The resulting mental landscape folds back on itself like a Möbius strip—an endless loop that exists only in the minds of its creators.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.