by David Safier
Mark Stegeman sent a letter to constituents discussing his views on what has been called by many, including me, a "book ban" at TUSD. You can read the entire letter after the jump.
A few things in the letter jumped out at me. One is the statement,
When the TUSD board voted (4-1) to end the Mexican-American Studies (MAS) curriculum, ending use of the books had to be part of that package.
No, ending the use of the books did not have to be part of that package. Is Stegeman unaware TUSD's communication director said the books were still OK'd for use by teachers who had not formerly taught MAS courses? For those teachers, some of the 7 books can still be used in the same courses where they are forbidden for use by former MAS teachers. It is not a course-specific ban. It is a teacher-specific ban. That makes a huge difference, and it contradicts what Stegeman wrote.
Then, after Stegeman lists the books, he writes this:
I am not aware of any other school district in Arizona which has approved these books for use in instruction. If anyone knows of such approvals, then I would be interested to hear about them.
The key word in the statement is "other," because it looks like one district approved 3 of the books: TUSD. According to a June 12, 20078, document posted on Three Sonorans, TUSD approved the use of "Critical Race Theory," "Occupied America" and "Pedagogy of the Oppressed."
The document looks legit, so I'll assume it is unless someone from TUSD says otherwise. If Stegeman knows the three texts had TUSD approval, he should have made that clear in his letter, then said he believes TUSD is the only district to approve the texts. Possibly he isn't aware of the prior approvals.
Read Mark Stegeman's constituent letter after the jump.