There is a lot of controversy over a new Spanish version of the National Anthem. Considering that there are no less than four different versions of a Spanish language anthem on the State Department’s website, it seems contrived for some people to try to exploit the creation of a fifth as political issue. Nor is … Read more
A nationwide day of boycotts and marches planned for May 1 will flood the country’s streets with Latinos demanding amnesty and legalization for undocumented workers. “We’re going to close down Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Tucson, Phoenix, Fresno,” says a boycott organizer. These protests will be even larger than the last wave of nation-wide immigration … Read more
I’m begining to wonder if 2008 will see a fracture of the GOP over the issue of immigration? Could a Perovian candidate right to the far right on this issue and split the GOP vote, as in 1992? The heir apparent of the GOP, Senator John McCain, has steered a moderate path on the immigration … Read more
Republicans have given Democrats a political gift. The gift is a Spanish language radio ad placed by the DNC that boldly lies to Hispanic voters (Windows Media Audio). Arizona Democrats are organizing to rebut the lie; but in my view, we would do better to pay for putting the original ad into heavier rotation. The … Read more
Update: Pearce’s comments and this post were picked up by reporter/author Dave Neiwert at his blog Orcinus, at which he writes about the racist/fascist element of the Right Wing in America.
Arizona State
Representative Russell Pearce (R-18), Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, and one of the most influential members of the Arizona House told Capital Media that he understood the motives of undocumented workers who come here to work.
He said, “I’d come, too, if you could give me a job and free everything.” He almost seems sympathic, doesn’t he?
About the recent protests here in Arizona on immigration policy, Pearce said, “They’re
illegal and they have no right to be marching down our streets. They
have no constitutional rights. They don’t have First-, Fourth-, Sixth
amendment rights. They’re here illegally and they chose to be here
illegally.”
This is a very irresponsible and inflamatory thing for a public official in Pearce’s position to say. If Pearce were to be taken at his word, the result would be that every undocumented immigrant would be legally equivalent to Bush’s terrorist suspects: in a legal black hole where no legal process could touch them, and not even basic human rights are to be afforded them. I have to wonder: is that what Pearce really wants?
Now, Pearce is certainly a political opportunist, or a racist, or both, and he has good cause to hold a personal grudge against illegal aliens, but he also has served as a judge pro-tem in Justice Court and been a deputy sheriff for most of his career, so he really has no excuse to be so frighteningly ignorant of the law. He may wish that illegal aliens had no rights, and he may be working to remove as many of them as he can (Pearce has introduced more anti-alien bills this session than any other lawmaker), but he’s dead wrong that they haven’t got any.
To be charitable, I will assume that Pearce only means what he says: illegal aliens haven’t any rights under Amendments I, IV, and VI. Even so, Pearce is demonstrably wrong according to the Supreme Court, and I’m inclined to take their word over that of a local-yokel jingo like Pearce.