July jobs report continues steady growth (Updated)

The July jobs report shows continued steady growth, and the previous two months were revised upwards. Despite this continued improvement in job growth — normally a positive factor in driving up wages — wages continued to stagnate.

I addressed this “new economy” in which more and more jobs are being displaced by technological innovations, mechanization and computerization in last month’s post. June jobs report continues steady growth. This is a factor holding down wages.

Economics is an inexact science, and the “rules” that may have been true for the “old” economy of the 20th Century may no longer be true for the “new” economy of the 21st Century. Economists have yet to come up with a sound explanation for this anomalous wage stagnation under prevailing economic theory.

Steve Benen has the July jobs report. Job growth remains on track, jobless rate at seven-year low:

The new report from Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the U.S. economy added 215,000 jobs in July, roughly in line with expectation. The overall unemployment rate remained at 5.3%, which is still its lowest point since April 2008, more than seven years ago.

The revisions also point in a fairly encouraging direction. May’s job totals were revised up, from 254,000 to 260,000, while June’s numbers were also revised up, from 223,000 to 231,000. Those are modest increases, to be sure, but it’s better than the alternative. The same report also showed a slight increase in wages.

JulyJobs

I can appreciate why job totals like these seem a little dull. Lately, it seems most monthly reports on jobs show roughly the same thing: growth around +200k and low unemployment. But let’s not take good news for granted, because it wasn’t that long ago that the country was desperate for news like this. What’s ho-hum in August 2015 would have produced dancing in the streets in August 2009.

Overall, the U.S. has added 2.91 million jobs over the last 12 months, which is excellent. July was the 58th consecutive month of positive job growth — the best stretch since 1939 — and the 65th consecutive month in which we’ve seen private-sector job growth, which is the longest on record.

Here’s another chart, this one showing monthly job losses/gains in just the private sector since the start of the Great Recession.

JulyPrivate

Meteor Blades at Daily Kos adds some additional numbers. Government reports 215,000 new jobs added in July; official unemployment rate holds at 5.3%:

[W]ages once again [are] nearly flat, rising just 0.2 percent over June. A week ago, the Department of Labor reported that U.S. wages and salaries rose 0.2 percent in the second quarter, the slowest pace on record since records began in 1982.

* * *

The official unemployment rate—which the BLS labels U3—remained at 5.3 percent. The bureau also measures both unemployment and underemployment, which it labels U6. This includes people with no job at all, part-time workers who want full-time jobs but can’t find one, and many “discouraged” workers. That fell in July to 10.4 percent.

The civilian workforce rose by 69,000, after having fallen 432,000 in June. The employment-population ratio remained at 59.3 percent, and  labor force participation was also unchanged at 62.6 percent.

Many analysts now speculate that the report was good enough to boost the chances that the Fed will raise interest rates at its September meeting. But there is one more jobs report before that meeting.

Last month Fed Chair Janet Yellen Told House Panel Interest Rate Hike Likely Later This Year. If wages remain stagnant and consumer price inflation remains low, there are no factors justifying raising interest rates.

UPDATE: Sen. John Kavanagh likes to pretend that he knows something about economics (see his comment below). He would have you believe that manufacturing jobs in the U.S. have been disappearing only since 2007. Those of us who are old enough to have lived through the deindustrialization of America that began in the 1960s with textile plants and steel mills being outsourced to foreign countries so that corporations could exploit cheap labor with slave wages know better. There are entire cities in America’s industrial heartland that were once thriving communities that were reduced to blighted ghost towns as their employment base disappeared — all in the name of pursuing higher profits to satisfy vulture capitalist investors.

Trade agreements, tax policies and fiscal policies of the U.S. adopted in the 1980s to today actually encouraged this policy of deindustrialization and off-shoring of American manufacturing jobs. There are numerous economic studies and books that have been written about this topic. Mr. Kavanagh should assign himself some summer reading.

Below is the official chart from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis showing the number of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. from 1940 to July 2015. All Employees: Manufacturing – FRED – St. Louis Fed (interactive graphic). You will note that there was an uptick in manufacturing jobs from 1993-1998 during the Clinton administration prior to the “Tech bubble” collapse beginning in 2000.  This was followed by a steep, massive decline in manufacturing jobs during the Bush administration, concluding with the Bush Great Recession that began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009. Manufacturing jobs bottomed out in March of 2010. Since then there has been a slow but steady increase in manufacturing jobs in the U.S. under the Obama administration — Sen. Kavanagh’s revisionist history notwithstanding.

Screenshot from 2015-08-07 16:24:29

11 responses to “July jobs report continues steady growth (Updated)

  1. Sen. John Kavanagh

    Regarding the participation rate, not everyone paints your positive Obama defensive position. Go to: http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/01/15/u-s-unemployment-retirees-are-not-the-labor-exodus-problem/2/

    In particular note this assertion:

    “On the other side are those such as senior fellow and director of Economics21 at the Manhattan Institute, Diana Furchtgott-Roth who, in a Jan. 14 piece for RealcCearMarkets.com noted that “since 2000 the labor force participation rates of workers 55 and over have been rising steadily, and the labor force participation rates of workers between 16 and 54 have been declining.”

    Also note:

    By far the biggest contributors to the drop in participation were:
    1. that the population of those aged 25-54 increased by 1.12 million, and yet its labor force actually shrank by 1.53 million—a net loss of 2.65 million; and
    2. 2.53 million people aged 16-24 failed to enter the labor force compared to the rate in 2003..”

    Those facts need to be considered also. Your sources do not reference them. Maybe they are unaware.

    • AZ BlueMeanie

      Yes I saw it. Forbes is a purveyor of conservative economics which has been entirely disproved and discredited since 2000. Just because some shill who gets paid by a right-wing think tank to say it doesn’t make it so. If you were to go back and evaluate all the crazy shit that Forbes has published over the years, you would find that it has a miserable track record.

      • State Senator John Kavanagh

        The data Forbes uses is government data.

        • AZ BlueMeanie

          Nice try. “Hard news” reporting may include government data. But Forbes’ contributors on economic policy are from the think tanks that sell faith based supply-side “trickle down” GOP economics. I do read it, I rarely use it. If you want just the government data, go to government sources like the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FED. Don’t waste your time with Forbes.

  2. State Senator John Kavanagh

    How about the 93+ million people not participating in the work force, creating a participation rate of only 67%, a low number not seen since 1977.

    Were a Republican president, I doubt these facts would have escaped your rosey assessment.

  3. State Senator John Kavanagh

    And your take on the effects of the $15 minimum wage for fast food workers.

    • AZ BlueMeanie

      Better yet, here is the Political Economy Research institute Report from January 2015. http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_351-400/WP373.pdf. Executive Summary:

      “[W]e find that the fast-food industry could fully absorb these wage bill increases through a combination of turnover reductions; trend increases in sales growth; and modest annual price increases over the four-year period. Working from the relevant existing literature, our results are based on a set of reasonable assumptions on fast-food turnover rates; the price elasticity of demand within the fast -food industry; and the underlying trend for sales growth in the industry. We also show that fast-food firms would not need to lower their average profit rate during this adjustment period. Nor would the fast-food firms need to reallocate funds generated by revenues away from any other area of their overall operations, such as marketing.”

  4. North Of The River

    Didn’t Kavanagh notice this afternoon at the State Capitol where a 18-Wheeler was dropping off 90 “robots’ that will replace all the Legislators next January???

  5. State Senator John Kavanagh

    Since 2007, the US has lost 1.4 million manufacturing jobs and gained 1.4 million waiter and bartendin jobs.

    And if you want to see “innovation,” raise the minimum wage for fast food workers to $15 an hour and watch robots replace many of those workers.