by David Safier
Sometimes I agree with Tucson Citizen's Mark Evans, sometimes I don't. Right now, I disagree vehemently with his argument against the one cent sales tax for education initiative Prop. 204. (If you got the Monday paper edition of the Star, you may have read his column there, but it's only online at the Citizen.)
Mark's a smart guy, and he makes a complex argument, but it's wrong-headed. You know the adage, "The perfect is the enemy of the good"? Mark's argument is an example of "The theoretical best case scenario is the enemy of what's happening down here on planet Arizona."
Basically, Mark says, rightly, that the one cent sales tax initiative makes sure the state doesn't spend any less on education than it did in the 2011 or 2012 budget, and the sales tax revenues will be added on top of that figure. Mark hates that idea.
[T]o use the initiative process to wall off billions of dollars from budget writers only makes Arizona’s overall fiscal problems worse and, on balance, is bad policy.
He acknowledges there's a reason to "wall off" the money: to stop the Republican-majority lege from just rolling the money from the sales tax initiative into the budget and either maintaining or lowering spending for education. If the initiative passes and the sales tax dollars are added to current spending, that will result in a $500-$600 per student funding increase (If that sounds like a lot of money, read on). But even though Mark acknowledges that's the only way to assure the money will go to education and he acknowledges we need more money for education, he thinks the "walling off" the funds will stop the state from responding responsibly if there is a serious economic crisis.
Mark's solution? Elect better legislators who will do the right thing for education. It's a lovely idea in that better, theoretical world of his. But down here on planet Arizona, it's a pipe dream to think the state's voters will elect enough progressive legislators to repair our broken tax system (broken, among other reasons, because the income tax has been cut by a third over recent decades, which has beggared the budget) any time in the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, Arizona's children (the state's future) are getting screwed out of the education they deserve.
We are now dead last in the amount we spend per student, as we have been for years, and if our children get that added $500-$600, we'll still be dead last. So to say the lege should be allowed to cut education funding still further if the economy goes further south is to say it's OK to balance the budget on the backs of our children, who are already carrying too much of the burden on their shoulders by having their educational opportunities diminished.
