Two for-profit charter school EMOs behaving badly
Public hearing in Tucson on attacks on public workers, 4pm Friday
Will Montana’s challenge to Citizens United v. FEC get a hearing before SCOTUS?
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Update to Montana Supreme Court takes a defiant stand against Citizens United v. FEC :
[B]y a 5-2 margin, Montana’s high court determined that the state law survived “strict scrutiny” because Montana’s unique context and history justified the ban in ways not contemplated by Citizens United. In his majority opinion, Chief Justice Mike McGrath dove deep into that history, ranging back over the “tumultuous years … marked by rough contests for political and economic domination primarily in the mining center of Butte, between mining and industrial enterprises controlled by foreign trusts or corporations.” Noting that, back in the last Gilded Age, Montana's wealthy "Copper Kings" bought judges and senators, picked the location of the capital, and owned the media, McGrath pointed to Montana’s vast size, sparse population, low-cost elections, and long history of having its resources plundered by foreign corporate interests to emphasize that the state has a compelling interest in maintaining its ban.
McGrath lays it out this way: “The question then, is when in the last 99 years did Montana lose the power or interest sufficient to support the statute, if it ever did. If the statute has worked to preserve a degree of political and social autonomy is the State required to throw away its protections?” The majority went out of its way to note that unlimited campaign spending on judicial elections is also having a profoundly damaging effect on judicial integrity all around the country.
Three corporations have now filed a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to strike down, without further briefing and oral argument, the state law on the premise that the Montana Supreme Court in upholding it simply failed to follow the Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, freeing corporations (and labor unions) to spend their own money as they wished on political campaigns.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy has the petition. He has the authority to act on his own on the stay issue, but would have to share with his colleagues any consideration of summarily overturning the state court’s decision; that would take five votes.
Reminder: Raúl Grijalva Campaign Kickoff on Sunday
Arizona Democratic Presidential Preference Caucus
Paul Ryan forces staff to read works of Russian atheist
