Teachers union to sue state

David Safier

by David Safier The legislature just passed a whole bunch of changes affecting teachers, not just budget cuts. They were passed earlier but Brewer's budget vetoes eliminated them. Now they're back. And the teacher's union is suing. Advertisement First, a comment. If I'm a serious teacher planning to make it a career, I'm going to … Read more

What ever happended to the good times the tax-cutters promised us?

AZ BlueMeanie

Posted by AzBlueMeanie: I am going to repost this essay by Sam Pizzigatti posted at Campaign for America's Future in its entirety. Sam makes essentially the same economic arguments I have made in several posts over the last couple of years with new recently released research. What Ever Happened to the Good Times the Tax-Cutters … Read more

This is just wrong

David Safier

by David Safier I learned recently that my posts are being used on another site without my permission. The posts aren't simply being quoted from or compiled with other posts from other sites. They are nearly the only original content on the site. They have my name at the top, but no link back to … Read more

Matthew Ladner responds

David Safier

by David Safier Matthew Ladner commented on the concerns I have expressed, along with others, about the survey Strategic Vision LLC was paid to conduct for G.I. Here are his comments, in full. David- I believed you linked to a post last week where I explained that I am awaiting further evidence from Strategic Vision. … Read more

Increased AZ private school enrollment? Not really

David Safier

by David Safier It's always a little dangerous to enter an econ prof's turf and question his use of numbers, but, what the hell, I'll give it a try. Charles North, an econ prof from Baylor University in Texas, entertained the House committee looking into whitewashing tuition tax credits with his study concluding that the … Read more

No comments from Goldwater about Civics survey

David Safier

by David Safier This is just me being curious. I rarely write about the Goldwater Institute, and especially about Matthew Ladner's work, without getting a fairly prompt response in the Comments. Recently I've been tag-teaming with others all over the country to question the accuracy of Ladner's Civics study, as well as 2 other studies … Read more

Bipartisan calls for Treasury Secretary Geithner to resign

AZ BlueMeanie

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

A brutal report issued last Monday by a government watchdog holds Timothy Geithner — then the head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and now the nation's Treasury Secretary — responsible for over payments that put billions of extra tax dollars in the coffers of major Wall Street firms, most notably Goldman Sachs. Geithner Singled Out In TARP Watchdog Neil Barofsky's Scathing Report On AIG Bailout:

The authoritative new narrative describes how, while bailing out insurance giant AIG last fall, a team led by Geithner failed nearly every step of the way.

Instead of bargaining with AIG's numerous counter-parties to resolve its billions of dollars in souring derivatives contracts, Geithner's team ended up paying top dollar for toxic assets — "an amount far above their market value at the time," the report notes.

"There is no question that the effect of FRBNY's decisions — indeed, the very design of the federal assistance to AIG — was that tens of billions of dollars of Government money was funneled inexorably and directly to AIG's counter-parties," the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program said.

Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Wachovia got full value for their derivatives contracts with AIG, and taxpayers got the bill. In total, $27.1 billion of public money was transferred to companies that did business with AIG.

Throughout the bailout of AIG, the report says, the New York Fed failed to develop appropriate contingency plans; failed to properly assess the impact of its decisions; and generally engaged in negotiation strategies that were doomed to fail.

Then, after Geithner's team paid off AIG's counter-parties on Wall Street, it imposed "onerous" terms on the troubled insurer, the report says.

"[T]he decision to acquire a controlling interest in one of the world's most complex and most troubled corporations was done with almost no independent consideration of the terms of the transaction or the impact that those terms might have on the future of AIG," the report finds.

Geithner, now the nation's chief financial officer, just didn't bargain hard enough with Wall Street's biggest companies, the report concludes:

[T]he refusal of FRBNY and the Federal Reserve to use their considerable leverage as the primary regulators for several of the counter-parties, including the emphasis that their participation in the negotiations was purely "voluntary," made the possibility of obtaining concessions from those counter-parties extremely remote. While there can be no doubt that a regulators' inherent leverage over a regulated entity must be used appropriately, and could in certain circumstances be abused, in other instances in this financial crisis regulators (including the Federal Reserve) have used overtly coercive language to convince financial institutions to take or forego certain actions. As SIGTARP reported in its audit of the initial Capital Purchase Program investments, for example, Treasury and the Federal Reserve were fully prepared to use their leverage as regulators to compel the nine largest financial institutions (including some of AIG's counter-parties) to accept $125 billion of TARP funding and to pressure Bank of America to conclude its merger with Merrill Lynch. Similarly, it has been widely reported that the Government, while arguably acting on behalf of General Motors and Chrysler, took an active role in negotiating substantial concessions from the creditors of those companies.

Meanwhile, the Fed was attempting to keep the details of AIG's counter-parties hidden from public view — another big mistake, according to the report:

The now familiar argument from Government officials about the dire consequences of basic transparency, as advocated by the Federal Reserve…once again simply does not withstand scrutiny. Federal Reserve officials initially refused to disclose the identities of the counter-parties or the details of the payments, warning that disclosure of the names would undermine AIG's stability, the privacy and business interests of the counter-parties, and the stability of the markets.

After public and Congressional pressure, AIG disclosed the identities. Notwithstanding the Federal Reserve's warnings, the sky did not fall; there is no indication that AIG's disclosure undermined the stability of AIG or the market or damaged legitimate interests of the counter-parties. The lesson that should be learned — one that has been made apparent time after time in the Government's response to the financial crisis — is that the default position, whenever Government funds are deployed in a crisis to support markets or institutions, should be that the public is entitled to know what is being done with Government funds.

While SIGTARP acknowledges that there might be circumstances in which the public's right to know what its Government is doing should be circumscribed, those instances should be very few and very far between.

On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was called to testify before the House Joint Economic Committee and walked into an ambush.

Voted Arizona’s Best Political Blog
by the Washington Post and Google’s FeedSpot

latest Event from thedgt.ORG

Upcoming community Events

Bluesky