As Hannibal Smith from the A Team used to say, “I love it when a plan comes together.”
More than 100 chief executives and corporate leaders gathered online Saturday to discuss taking new action to combat the GQP Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression bills being introduced across the country, including the bill recently signed into law in Georgia,” the Washington Post reports. More than 100 corporate executives hold call to discuss halting donations and investments to fight controversial voting bills:
Executives from major airlines, retailers and manufacturers — plus at least one NFL owner, Arthur Blank, cofounder of Home Depot and owner of the NFL Atlanta Falcons — talked about potential ways to show they opposed the legislation, including by halting donations to politicians who support the bills and even delaying investments in states that pass the restrictive measures, according to four people who were on the call, including one of the organizers, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale management professor.
While no final steps were agreed upon, the meeting represents an aggressive dialing up of corporate America’s stand against controversial voting measures nationwide, a sign that their opposition to the laws didn’t end with the fight against the Georgia legislation passed in March.
It also came just days after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) feebly warned that firms should “stay out of politics” — echoing a view shared by many conservative politicians and setting up the potential for additional conflict between Republican leaders and the heads of some of America’s largest firms. This month, former president Donald Trump called for conservatives to boycott Coca-Cola, Major League Baseball, Delta Air Lines, Citigroup, ViacomCBS, UPS and other companies after they opposed the law in Georgia that critics say will make it more difficult for poorer voters and voters of color to cast ballots. Baseball officials decided to move the All-Star Game this summer from Georgia to Colorado because of the voting bill.
The online call between corporate executives on Saturday “shows they are not intimidated by the flak. [Aw, Mitch has a sad.] They are not going to be cowed,” Sonnenfeld said. “They felt very strongly that these voting restrictions are based on a flawed premise and are dangerous.”
Leaders from dozens of companies such as Delta, American, United, Starbucks, Target, LinkedIn, Levi Strauss and Boston Consulting Group, along with Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank, were included on the Zoom call, according to people who listened in.
The discussion — scheduled to last one hour but going 10 minutes longer — was led at times by Kenneth Chenault, the former chief executive of American Express, and Kenneth Frazier, the chief executive of Merck, who told the executives that it was important to keep fighting what they viewed as discriminatory laws on voting. Chenault and Frazier coordinated a letter signed last month by 72 Black business executives that made a similar point — a letter that first drew attention to the voting bills in executive suites across the country.
The executives also took out a full-page print ad in today's New York Times.
"Memo to Corporate America: The Fierce Urgency is Now." pic.twitter.com/is8XfbNCcw
— Legal Defense Fund (@NAACP_LDF) March 31, 2021
The call’s goal was to unify companies that had been issuing their own statements and signing on to drafted statements from different organizations after the action in Georgia, Sonnenfeld said. The leaders called in from around the country — some chimed in from Augusta, Ga., where they were attending the Masters golf tournament.
“There was a defiance of the threats that businesses should stay out of politics,” Sonnenfeld said. “They were obviously rejecting that even with their presence (on the call). But they were there out of concern about voting restrictions not being in the public interest.”
Middle finger salute to Mitch!
One Georgia-based executive talked about how the final version of Georgia’s legislation — which Gov. Brian Kemp (R) has said actually expands voting access, a claim that many have challenged — was much worse than expected, and how that should serve as a warning to other chief executives as more states consider adopting their own voting bills, according to people on the call.
Access to the polls has emerged as a major national issue. Republican state lawmakers are trying to pass legislation they say is designed to combat voting fraud — which Trump has baselessly and frequently claimed is a problem. GOP-backed bills in various statehouses aim to ban ballot drop boxes, limit voting periods, restrict absentee voting or stiffen requirements for voter identification. Five bills with new voter restrictions have been passed nationwide so far, with 55 restrictive bills in 24 states being considered by legislatures, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan law and policy institute.
Companies have jumped into hot-button political debates before, such as the corporate backlash to a 2016 North Carolina bill banning transgender people from using the public restroom that corresponds with their gender identities. After the Capitol riot in January, many companies pledged to stop donating to politicians who spurred doubts about the outcome of the presidential election.
There already has been backsliding on this pledge. Companies sidestep self-imposed bans on GOP donations: “Dozens of companies said after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol that they would stop donating to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the results, but recent financial disclosures show some are now making direct contributions to the House and Senate GOP campaign arms that dole out funds to those same lawmakers.”
Monitor corporate campaign donations and publicly shame these companies for supporting seditious insurrectionists and GQP Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression Republicans.
Now, it is voting rights. Many of the corporate leaders who joined the call seemed to view the voting restrictions as attacks on democracy [ya think?!], rather than as a partisan issue, according to people who listened in.
Mike Ward, cofounder of the Civic Alliance, a nonpartisan group of businesses focused on voter engagement, said he felt there was a broad consensus at the end of the call that company leaders plan to continue working against voting bills they think are restrictive — “to lean into this, not lean away from this.”
Put your money where your mouth is, or more accurately, pull your money out of campaign contributions to seditious insurrectionists and GQP Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression Republican organizations, in particular, Mitch McConnell’s Senate Leadership Fund, to demonstrate that his feeble threat to America’s corporations to “stay out of politics” has backfired on him, big time. The best way to punish McConnell is to dry up his access to unlimited corporate campaign contributions.
Put that money to better use by registering more voters and to ensure voter easy access to voting. I would love to see Coca-Cola rolling out vending carts of ice cold Cokes for anyone forced to stand in long lines at polling locations in Georgia in defiance of the new GQP Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression law. Home Depot could provide lawn chairs for them to sit on. Be creative in your civil disobedience for voting rights of this Jim Crow 2.0 voter suppression law.
I know that corporate accountability is something new to most business executives. Most only care about the short-term interest of maximizing quarterly profits for their shareholders. Most corporations act without a conscience. This may now be changing. Corporate accountability and responsible corporate citizenship has been a long time in coming. It’s about damn time.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
On a related note, the NCAA Board of Governors announced a transgender athlete policy: “in determining where championships are held, NCAA policy directs that only locations where hosts can commit to providing an environment that is safe, healthy and free of discrimination should be selected. We will continue to closely monitor these situations to determine whether NCAA championships can be conducted in ways that are welcoming and respectful of all participants. ” “NCAA Board of Governors Statement on Transgender Participation”, https://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/ncaa-board-governors-statement-transgender-participation