Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
The Christian Taliban is back again, seeking to impose its religious dogma on all Americans of all religious faiths or no religious faith, by force of law. It is a clear violation of constitutional separation of church and state, which I am sure those sponsoring this bill will argue does not exist under their Christian Reconstructionist and Dominionionist theology. These are people I like to call "wrong."
Sen. Steve Smith (R-Maricopa) freely admits that he is seeking to impose his own religious dogma on everyone else by force of law. Abortion bill would alter Arizona law to define life as beginning at conception – East Valley Tribune:
The first-term lawmaker said if it were up to him, all abortions would be illegal.
"I guess I'm a purist," he said. "It's easy for me as a man to say that because I'll never be in that situation."
Smith said his reasons go back more to his religious beliefs.
"God doesn't make mistakes," he said. "I believe that God is still on the throne and that's happening for a reason, whether we get it or not."
Smith acknowledged his goal in imposing new requirements is to impose his religious dogma on everyone else:
[T]he most significant part of SB 1494 is that it would alter Arizona law to define human life as beginning at conception. And that could pave the way for abortion foes to use the Arizona statute to mount a head-on challenge to the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision declaring that women have a constitutional right to an abortion.
* * *
"It clearly tells the woman that what they're aborting is a human being," he said.
His legislation hammers that point home with a requirement that a woman be told, at least 24 hours in advance, that the abortion "will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being." And a pregnant woman also would have to be informed she "has an existing relationship with that unborn human being" which is protected by the U.S. Constitution and state laws.
* * *
Smith's legislation would apply in both cases of surgical and medical abortions, the latter involving the use of RU-486 which induces a woman to miscarry.
Less clear is how a law defining life as beginning at conception might affect the legal use of the "morning-after pill."