Ballot Propositions and Referenda for 2012 Voter Guide

By Michael Bryan

Here at BlogForArizona we generally don't do endorsements. We believe in presenting readers with good information and letting them make up their own minds. In addition, doing so can be problematic because of the diversity of views of our bloggers. Finally, there is something ineffably subjective and human about choosing another person to represent you that mere analysis of positions or policies or biographies cannot really capture.

ProgressiveinitBut when it comes to ballot questions, we're on firmer ground. The language of the ballot question is what it is. Sometimes a good deal of legal or institutional knowledge is required to understand the likely effect of the new law, which not every voter has. So, to help voters fully participate in this aspect of Arizona's Progressive heritage, BlogForArizona presents a recommended list of positions on the ballot questions this year.

There is a diversity of opinion on a few of the citizen inititiative Props here on the blog. Some members feel that the permanent sales tax must be passed, and our BlueMeanie feels the top two primary would be a disaster. Both Democrats and Republicans feel that Open Primaries will be problematic, which is a point in favor of the reform, in my view. In fairness, I should note that my recomendations for these two citizen initiatives go against the majority opinion in the Democratic establishment. So be it. There will be links to alternative views on these Props as they become available.

Update 10/21/12: I've been convinced by colleagues, friends, and analysts that the unintended consequences of Prop 121 would outweight any benefits. I have changed by recommendation to NO.

Though not a perfect guide, if the State Legislature has referred the question to the ballot, you should vote NO, unless very strong evidence convinces you otherwise. If it is a citizen petition, give it due consideration before voting NO. You can see the approved ballot language for all the measures here.

Prop 114: Crime Victim Protection From Liability NO
Prop 115: Judicial Selection NO
Prop 116: Personal Business Property Tax Exemption Amount NO
Prop 117: Property Tax Assesed Value Limit NO
Prop 118: Pemanent State Land Endowment Fund, Distribution NO
Prop 119: State Land Trust Exchanges YES
Prop 120: State Sovereignty NO
Prop 204: Sales Tax Extension NO
Prop 121: Top Two Primaries NO
Prop [Not Yet Numbered]: Right to Reject Federal Laws  NO

Read on for full explanations of recommended votes…

Matt Heinz at Drinking Liberally Tucson 7/25

Dear Liberals, Come join us this Wednesday night starting at 6pm at the Shanty on 4th Avenue. This week our guest host is Matt Heinz. Matt is challenging Congressman Ron Barber for the Democratic Party nomination for the new CD2 seat. Come learn about Matt and his campaign, and share a beer with him and … Read more

Sugar Ray Goes Off on Rosemont!

By Michael Bryan

I respect any politician, or either party, who speaks truth to power, especially when they are doing so to stand up for their community.

Pima County Supervisor Ray Carroll is bound to get some flack for his recent comments at a Save the Scenic Santa Ritas meeting (hat tip to Sonoran Alliance). He was lamenting the fact that local newspapers are raking in cash for running Rosemont's propaganda ads, causing a financial conflict in covering fairly the issues involved in the controversial mine project. He said he wished that those news outlets would put stock in their community and "stop selling out to those pricks".

Hells to the yeah, Sugar Ray! This is one Republican who is not backing off what he believes because some Tea Party wackadoodles have gotten it in their heads that Ray's not conservative enough for them. Some think that Ray is insufficiently on board with the plan for some foreign corporation to bust in here, hose our views and our water supply, leave us with another toxic mess to clean up, and blow town with the profits.

Well, Ray's ::gasp:: representing the concerns and views of his constituents in the district on this matter. Rather than rolling over and showing belly to every multi-nat that rolls in, like every other Tea Party dupe is begging to do these days, Ray's actually fighting for the people he represents. I didn't even know that Republicans were still allowed to do that.

See Ray proving me wrong after the click…

Even in Apologizing, Russell Pearce Demonstrates Unfitness For Office

By Michael Bryan Today Russell Pearce finally threw in the towel and just apologized for his wooden-headed statements on Facebook following the Aurora massacre. But even as he apologized for having caused offense, he doubled down: "I will never understand policies that disarm honest citizens and leave them vulnerable to the premeditated attacks of madmen…" … Read more

Mr. Romney, Your Apology From The Obama Campaign, Sir…

By Michael Bryan

RomneyrichWell, that happened… Campaign Obama's Stephanie Cutter issued an apology today to Mr. Romney for saying that he was either a liar or a felon for his SEC filings with Bain from 1999 to 2002. It was heart-felt and moving. It should more than satisfy Mr. Romney's wounded sensibilities.

See the historic apology after the click…