Voter ID: a solution in search of a problem, or just a means to an end?

VotersA cause célèbre for conservative is the idea that hoards of non-citizens or impersonators are voting at the polls, and that’s why we must have voter ID at the polls. Conspiracy theorists like John Fund have turned this fear mongering into a profitable cottage industry.

I have posted about the several media and academic studies done over the years on this subject which entirely refute the fantasy that there is in-person “voter fraud” occurring at the polls. It is virtually non-existent.

Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola University Law School and an expert in constitutional law and the law of democracy, with a particular focus on election administration and redistricting, has the latest research. A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast:

Voter ID laws are back in the news once again, with two new opinions from the Wisconsin Supreme Court late last week dealing with the state’s ID requirement, which would allow people to vote only if they provide certain forms of government-issued ID. The Court made some minor changes to the law but otherwise upheld it. However, the ID requirement is still on hold pending a federal lawsuit.

Read more

Know your anti-choice Democratic candidates in AZ. Part 4.

This installment will conclude my series on the anti-choice Dems running in legislative primaries. This last one, Sen. Catherine Miranda (LD27), might prove the most difficult to remove due to her incumbency and the strength of her family name. Luckily, her challenger is the hugely impressive and indefatigable campaigner Aaron Marquez. (I’m pretty sure Aaron has gotten more money out of me than any legislative candidate ever has because he’s that good at raising it.) And while it sucks to want a female Democrat to be defeated, Miranda has got to go, we’ll be getting a staunch ally in the Senate with Aaron Marquez:

a marquez

On your campaign website, you mention that as part of your service with the United States Army Reserve, you helped to build women’s centers in Afghanistan. Can you tell us more about this: What services did they provide, and what impact have they had?

Read more

League of Women Voters and LULAC: Arizona failing to offer required voter registration

Arizona Secretary of State Ken “Birther” Bennett is denying low income Arizona residents the opportunity to register to vote using the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) federal form in his ongoing pissing match with the federal government over Prop. 200 proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration. Project Vote reports, Arizona Once Again Failing to Offer Required Voter Registration

Secretary of State Bennett and State Agencieson Notice for Violations of Federal Law

Screenshot-15PHOENIX, AZ — Citing clear evidence that numerous low-income Arizona residents have been denied the opportunity to register to vote, the League of Women Voters of Arizona and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) sent official notice today to Secretary of State Ken Bennett, as well to the heads of three Arizona public assistance agencies (the Department of Economic Security, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, and the Department of Health Services), that the State is violating the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

The notification letter calls on Secretary Bennett, as Arizona’s chief election official, and the other officials to take the necessary corrective action to ensure Arizona’s public assistance offices comply with the NVRA. The letter notes that although the State entered into an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2008, which has since expired, the State continues to violate key provisions of the NVRA. The voting rights groups also offer in the letter to work cooperatively with Secretary Bennett and state officials to help Arizona avoid litigation and come into compliance with the NVRA.

Legal representation is being provided to the two organizations by voting rights attorneys from Project Vote, Demos, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and the ACLU of Arizona.

Read more

Same-sex marriage appeals arrive at SCOTUS (‘Windsor Sequels’)

EqualThe nation’s longest-running federal court challenge to a state ban on same-sex marriage — now in its tenth year — reached the Supreme Court on Wednesday.  Lyle Denniston reports at SCOTUSblog.com, Oklahoma clerk appeals on same-sex marriage:

A county clerk in Oklahoma filed a petition seeking to defend that state’s ban, one day after a similar appeal was filed by Utah officials.  The Oklahoma case (Smith v. Bishop) has been docketed as 14-136. Other cases are due at the Court soon.

And in Same-sex marriage issue reaches the Court early:

Virginia officials will be submitting their own petition to the Supreme Court on Friday, Attorney General Mark R. Herring said in a filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Read more

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals hears six same-sex marriage appeals from four states

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals this afternoon heard six same-sex marriage appeals from four states:

DeBoer, et al v. Snyder, et al, Case No. 14-1341 (E.D. Michigan)

Obergefell, et al v. Himes, et al., Case No. 14-3057 (S.D. Ohio) consolidated with Henry, et al. v. Himes, Case No. 14-3464 (S.D. Ohio)

Bourke, et al v. Beshear, et al, Case No. 14-5291 (W.D. Kentucky). consolidated with Love, et al. v. Beshear , Case. No. 14-5818 (W.D. Kentucky)

Tanco, et al. v. Haslam, Case No. 14-5297 (M.D. Tennessee)

The Cincinnati Enquirer reports, Gay marriage hearing ends: How will court rule?:

EqualTwo Republican-appointed judges weighing the fate of gay marriage in four states, including Ohio and Kentucky, didn’t give much away as they peppered lawyers on both sides Wednesday with hard-hitting questions.

Especially difficult to read was Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, whose queries fell on both sides of the issue. At one point, he declared that modern-day marriage is about “love, affection and commitment” rather than procreation – poking a hole in one argument against legalizing same-sex marriage.

Then, at another, he criticized gay rights advocates for trying to bypass voters. “Changing hearts and minds happens much more effectively through the Democratic process than through the courts,” Sutton said.

[Well Judge, fundamental civil rights are not subject to a plebiscite vote. That’s what makes them fundamental rights.]

Read more