Anti-choicers have a strange lack of concern for the “safety” of women giving birth

Crossposted at DemocraticDiva.com

pregnant

I’m in the middle of reading Katha Pollitt’s Pro: Reclaiming Abortion Rights, which is, among other things, an excellent examination of the illogical and inconsistent stances of anti-choice activists. Just to pick one example, of many:

Why is it rare to see large groups of people praying the rosary in front of fertility clinics or shouting at the women on the way in? Why don’t fertility specialists have to wear bulletproof vests? Why don’t hospitals deny them admitting privileges the way they do doctors who perform abortions? The difference between a petri dish and the womb isn’t in the embryos, it’s in the woman’s perceived intention. The woman undergoing IVF is fulfilling her traditional motherly role, even if she kills a lot of embryos in the process; the woman undergoing abortion is seen as rejecting it, even if she already has six kids.

Read more

Now that the Super Bowl is over, time to pull the tarp off the crAZy in the AZ Lege

AZ-Capital-with-Flags-frontFirst, some important deadlines in the Arizona legislature: TODAY is the last day for Senate bills to be introduced without special permission.

A week from today, February 9, is the last day for House bills to be introduced without special permission.

The Lege has an ambitious goal of Friday, February 20, as the last day for House consideration of House bills, and the last day for Senate consideration of Senate bills. This has little meaning in a state legislature which permits “strike everything” amendments at any time in the legislative process.

If you think this legislative session has been slightly less crAZy than past legislative sessions, you have the presence of the Super Bowl on Sunday to thank  for that. The crazies have been holding their bills until after our Super Bowl guests leave town today, according to the Arizona Capitol Times (subscription required) Rumors persist: Lightning rod bills to surface after Super Bowl: “A confluence of circumstances is aiding the persistence of a rumor at the Arizona Capitol – the “crazy” is lurking behind Super Bowl XLIX.”

E.J. Montini of The Republic admitted in his column Sunday that even The Republic has been “sugar coating” its news coverage while the Super Bowl was in town so as not to frighten our Super Bowl guests with the crAZy. Good news! The bad news is back … on Monday. That is one helluva an admission to make by the state’s largest news conglomerate, dontcha think? It just screams journalistic integrity – not!

Read more

Pro Tip: You can’t analyze taxes in Arizona without discussing Prop. 108 (1992)

Earlier this year, each  of the editorial board pundits of The Arizona Republic pontificated that Arizona needs to close “tax loopholes” — shorthand for tax exemptions and tax credits — and to raise tax revenues to close Arizona’s budget deficit, which is the result of a structural revenue deficit due to years of tax cuts.

Today, Tim Steller of the Arizona Daily Star joins in their analysis. Steller: Arizona could raise revenue, cut less. Steller blames it all on “politics.”

8011098.gif~c200What is entirely missing from the political punditocracy’s analysis of Arizona’s budget deficit and structural revenue deficit is any mention of what lies at the heart of the problem: Proposition 108 (1992), the “Two-Thirds for Taxes” Amendment, Arizona Constitution Article 9, Section 22. It’s almost as if there is an editorial prohibition against any reporter or pundit mentioning Prop. 108 in their reporting.

I consider Prop. 108 the GOP’s “weapon of mass destruction.” Here is why: it only takes a simple majority vote of the legislature to approve cuts to tax rates, or to enact tax exemptions and tax credits (tax expenditures). But these tax revenue reducers become permanent in practical reality because Prop. 108 requires a two-thirds super-majority vote in both chambers of the legislature to increase tax rates, or to reduce or eliminate any tax exemption or tax credit.

Since Prop. 108 was enacted by voters in 1992, the Arizona legislature has not increased tax rates, and has not closed “tax loopholes” as all the pundits decry that we desperately need to do. A tyranny of a minority of anti-tax zealots in the Arizona legislature are empowered to prevent any such tax reforms: 11 members in the Senate, or 21 members in the House.

Read more

Dumbest man in the world explains his anti-vaxxing stance

Crossposted from DemocraticDiva.com

Oh man, there is so much news going on in the world right now, including a noxious anti-choice bill before the AZ state legislature, but I have to deal with this jerkass first.

jack wolfson
Derp

Dr. Jack Wolfson is a man who got a medical degree and is practicing cardiologist, which is no small wonder as he is also a flipping moron.

Despite a recent measles outbreak in California, a Valley doctor believes children should not get vaccinated and that they should be getting this kind of infection.

“We should be getting measles, mumps, rubella, chicken pox, these are the rights of our children to get it,” said Dr. Jack Wolfson of Wolfson Integrative Cardiology in Paradise Valley.

Wolfson does not believe in vaccination. “We do not need to inject chemicals into ourselves and into our children in order to boost our immune system,” he said.

The cardiologist also believes the key is to have a healthy immune system. In order to have that, he says, you have to avoid chemicals, get enough sleep, exercise, take good supplements, and have proper nutrition.

“I’m a big fan of what’s called paleo-nutrition, so our children eat foods that our ancestors have been eating for millions of years,” he said. “That’s the best way to protect.”

Read more

How committed are anti-choicers to forcing pregnant women to give birth, under any circumstance? Very.

Crossposted from DemocraticDiva.com

March for LifeLook at this rose! How can you say we’re not nice people? We like roses!

Last week was the 42nd anniversary of the Roe v Wade decision and, of course, the annual pilgrimage of anti-choicers from all over the country to descend upon the nation’s capital to show what loving, compassionate, and totally-not-obsessed-with-punishing-women-for-sex people they are. Emily Crocket of RH Reality Check reported on some of the, shall we say, slightly disturbing things said by anti-abortion activists at the March for Life:

“Rape and incest are awful things, and there’s already so much hurt and pain in those situations, but adding more hurt, more pain [from an abortion] isn’t going to help anybody,” said David Held of Purdue Students for Life.

“I personally believe that it’s pretty selfish of them to go and kill that person” by having an abortion after a rape, said a young man from a Catholic high school near Lafayette, Louisiana, whose priest asked that the students not be named. “It’s probably going to hurt the whole time, but it’s a sacrifice that you have to make.”

Read more