Debunking the United Parcel Service ‘Obama-Scare’ story

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

The Arizona Republic today gave Glenn Hamer, president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, an opportunity to smear the Affordable Care Act aka "ObamaCare" based upon the United Parcel Service "Obama-Scare" story making the rounds in the conservative media entertainment complex this week. Employers try to get ahead of health law. While the reporting does include relevant caveats and opposing viewpoints, the organization of the article is confusing to readers and arguably misleading.

If you want clarity on the United Parcel Service "Obama-Scare" story in the conservative media entertainment complex, you need to read Jonathan Cohn at The New Republic. Why UPS Spouses Shouldn't Be (Too) Mad at Obamacare:

The latest Obamacare story getting everybody’s attention is about the United Parcel Service. On Wednesday, Kaiser Health News and USA Today reported
that UPS was making a change in its employee health plan—and that, as a
result, 15,000 spouses of UPS employees would lose access to company
insurance. One reason for the change, according to the company, is that
UPS faces higher insurance costs from Obamacare. Eliminating coverage
for these spouses is one way the company can reduce its employee benefit
costs.

The headlines certainly don’t look good. And, sure enough, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
on Thursday cited the decision as more proof that Obamacare is a
fiasco. But like so many Obamacare stories, this one is more complicated
than it seems at first blush. Spousal coverage was becoming less common
even before the Affordable Care Act became law.
At most, Obamacare is
hastening a trend that was already underway—quite possibly for some good
reasons. 

Selling the Marketplace health insurance exchanges

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Tea PartyRemember back when FreedomWorks and Americans For Prosperity had old white people carrying signs saying "Keep your government hands off my Medicare"? These teabaggers were so hopelessly ignorant that many genuinely believed that Medicare is not a government-mandated health care program.

Apparently none of them were ever intellectually curious enough to look at their paychecks for all of those years and wonder "Who is this FICA guy, and why is he taking my money?" [The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax is for Social Security tax withholding (6.2% up to the annual maximum), and Medicare tax withholding (1.45%)].

As Timothy Noah pointed out at the time, "Medicare, you may have heard, is a government program, and the only way
to take the government's hands off it would be to abolish it—but the
joke is starting to wear thin." "Medicare isn't government" meme. – Slate Magazine:

The big lie that Medicare isn't, nor ever should be, financed and regulated by the government, is a nice illustration of Slate founder Michael Kinsley's hypothesis, articulated in his 1995 book Big Babies,
that infantile denial lies at the heart of much contemporary political
disaffection
.

The American people, Kinsley wrote, "make flagrantly
incompatible demands—cut my taxes, preserve my benefits, balance the
budget—then explode in self-righteous outrage when the politicians fail
to deliver." Although Kinsley conceded that big babyism had been enabled
by both conservative and liberal politics, he wrote: "It is
conservatives, more than liberals, who stoke the fires of resentment and
encourage vast swaths of the electorate to indulge in fantasies of
victimization by others." This is perhaps 1,000 times more true today than it was 14 years ago.

This infantile denial on Medicare is being repeated with the Affordable Care Act aka "ObamaCare."

Getting ready for ‘ObamaCare’

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Some informative reporting today from Michelle Singletary at the Washington Post. I would encourage Arizona's print media to pick up this series of columns by Singletary to, you know, actually inform your readers about "ObamaCare" and the health insurance exchanges coming online October 1. Getting
ready for Obamacare
:

A marketplace like no other is opening soon.

Beginning Oct. 1, people without health insurance will be able to shop for what is promised to be affordable coverage.

It’s all part of the rollout of the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act, which was passed by Congress and signed by President Obama in
2010. For the past three years, various parts of the law have been
implemented: Young adults can stay on their parents’ health insurance
until they turn 26; insurance companies are prohibited from imposing
lifetime dollar limits on essential services such as hospital stays;
people with Medicare get free preventive services.

Next up is a
part of the law that requires most Americans to maintain “minimum
essential” health insurance coverage. It’s one of the more controversial
provisions of the law commonly referred to as Obamacare.

* * *

This is the first in a series of columns explaining the provisions of
the law that are due to take effect next year. But ultimately, you’re
going to have to do some research yourself. Don’t be informed by rumors
or the political discourse surrounding this law. There’s enough
complication in the application of the provisions that you don’t need to
add to your fears or frustrations by getting advice that is politically
motivated.

Rich Crandall should love Obamacare

by David Safier Soon-to-be-ex State Senator Rich Crandall is lucky he can double dip, or he and his family could be without healthcare for a few weeks. If I were an anti-Obamacare Republican, I might say, "Why should Arizona keep covering your health care when you're not doing your job? It's your problem, not ours. … Read more

UPDATED: Monthly Progressive Roundtables Give PDA Members a ‘Seat at the Table’ (video)

Group-47-sig-sm300by Pamela Powers Hannley

UPDATE: This article was picked up by the national publication In These Times and by the Daily Kos Progressive Blog Round-up. Check out the In These Times version for more details: Knights of the Progressive Roundtable.

Deals are made, and bills are negotiated not only in the halls of Congress but in offices and meeting rooms around DC. Since December 2012, Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) has been conducting monthly, Educate Congress roundtable meetings with Congressional representatives and key staff.

With a give-and-take format, these meetings allow PDA representatives and allies to discuss proposed legislation and related progressive ideas and allow Congressional representatives and staffers to offer updates, insights, and strategies.

The Progressive Roundtables provide a forum to address a broad range of issues– from Wall Street gambling and hunger in America to voting rights, immigration, fracking, universal healthcare, the living wage, austerity, tax reform, mass incarceration, and more.

“One of the things I love about PDA is you stand up for ‘the little guy,’ and that’s what government’s all about,” Massachusetts Rep. Jim McGovern told the roundtable audience in July 2013. “Donald Trump doesn’t need us [Congress], but somebody who is unemployed or somebody who is working and making so little that they still qualify for SNAP [food stamps], they need us!” More roundtable details and videos after the jump.)