Health care reform: Can improved financial access to health care services also improve geographic access to health care services?
By Craig McDermott, cross-posted from Random Musings
On Friday, Government Executive, essentially a business newspaper for
people whose "business" is government agency operations, published an
"insider baseball" sort of article. It relates to areas that are designated as "medically underserved areas" (MUAs).
Federal employees are covered covered under slightly different health insurance reimbursement rules when they work in MUAs.
From the article, written by Eric Katz –
The statute that governs the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program
requires OPM to determine which states have “critical shortages of
primary care physicians.” Employees in these states — known as
“medically underserved areas” — receive reimbursement for covered
services by any licensed provider in the state.
The next lines in the article are the ones that caught my attention (emphasis added) –
OPM [the federal Office of Personnel Management, basically the federal government's version of an HR department] calculates which states are underserved using data from the Health
and Human Services Departments, as well as the Census Bureau. If at
least 25 percent of the state’s population lives in a “primary medical
care manpower shortage area” — as determined by HHS — the state is
considered underserved.The 12 states that will receive the distinctive consideration in 2014
are Alabama, Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri,
New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wyoming.
After first noticing that most of the states listed are "red" states (hey, this is *political* blog, not a *medical* one...), I noticed that most of the states listed, other than Illinois, are known as being very rural.
Which sent my thoughts off on a tangent (hence, this post. 🙂 )