Immigration

My ancestors didn’t immigrate to America legally or illegally; they were just immigrants

by

When the media reports on America’s history of immigration, they typically begin with Ellis Island in New York. But Ellis Island did not even open until 1892.

My ancestors came to America much earlier. They entered through Castle Garden in the Battery of New York, which opened in 1855. For 35 years Castle Garden served as the chief immigration depot in the United States and was the first formal receiving station anywhere in the world. Prior to Castle Garden there was virtually no regulation of immigration or routine process for dealing with immigrant ships that arrived in New York. US Immigration 1840-1920: Step One.

Castle_Garden2

Which brings me to this post by Ben Railton at Talking Points Memo. No, Your Ancestors Didn’t Come Here Legally:

Prior to 1875’s Page Act and 1882’s Chinese Exclusion Act, there were no national immigration laws. None. There were laws related to naturalization and citizenship, to how vessels reported their passengers, to banning the slave trade. Once New York’s Castle Garden Immigration Station opened in 1855, arrivals there reported names and origins before entering the U.S. But for all pre-1875 immigrants, no laws applied to their arrival. They weren’t legal or illegal; they were just immigrants.

Read more

Federal judge tosses Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s frivolous lawsuit

by

A federal judge gave the Obama administration an early Christmas present by tossing out a challenge to President Obama’s immigration executive actions filed by desperate-for-attention Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio. “No soup for you!” The Hill reports, Judge rejects challenge to Obama’s executive action on immigration : U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell warned in an opinion … Read more

(Update) Federal judge skeptical of Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s frivolous lawsuit

by

The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank takes down Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s unethical lawyer Larry Klayman in an op-ed today, A conservative gadfly:

gavelLarry Klayman is losing again.

The conservative gadfly, who has been suing presidents for years with little success, was back in court Monday morning, this time representing Joe Arpaio, the Arizona sheriff famous for his immigration crackdowns, who wants President Obama’s immigration orders to be struck down.

Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee to the U.S. District Court in Washington, was unimpressed. Over an hour, she smiled patiently at Klayman, arched her eyebrows, squinted and shook her head at his arguments, and stared at the ceiling in exasperation.

She pronounced herself “confused” and “puzzled” by his claims. “That doesn’t cut it for me,” she told him, pointing out a “fallacy” in his case and saying, “I fail to see” the applicability of his argument. The judge further told Klayman, “You’ve got a big standing problem.” And when he tried to argue otherwise, she replied: “I really don’t find it at all persuasive. We can move on.”

Klayman faced his near-certain defeat with aplomb. He asked the judge to move “quickly” because “however you rule, it’s probably going to the Supreme Court.”

“I wouldn’t predict,” Howell said tartly.

Read more

Federal judge skeptical of Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s frivolous lawsuit

by

It looks as if the federal court for the District of Columbia is not as enamored with Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s ridiculous antics as is our feckless Arizona political media. The Hill reports, ‘Sheriff Joe’ challenges Obama in court:

gavelA federal judge on Monday appeared highly skeptical of a lawsuit from Sheriff Joe Arpaio that challenges the constitutionality of President Obama’s executive actions on immigration.

After listening to an hour of oral arguments, District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell said she was not prepared to rule on the case the same day. Her opinion on whether to block Obama’s action, she said, would come “very shortly.”

The lawsuit from Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz., is the first federal challenge against Obama’s move to shield up to 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Read more

Your opportunity to protest Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio’s frivolous lawsuit

by

I do not often agree with Robert Robb of The Arizona Republic, but back in July he had a thought provoking commentary with which I agree questioning the utility of Arizona electing so many offices that are appointed offices in other states. Appointed officials would have some advantages.

I mean really, do we need to elect county assessor, recorder, treasurer, county attorney and county superintendent of public instruction? This is simply an attempt to replicate state elected offices, several of which would be better served as appointed positions, e.g., state mine inspector, corporation commission, and superintendent of public instruction.

The one office I have always believed should not be an elected office is county sheriff. Why is this a political office? Wouldn’t we be better served if the sheriff was a professional law enforcement officer appointed by the County Board of Supervisors after a rigorous candidate search and public commentary period?

Babeu-ArpaioThe fact that we elect sheriffs is how we get clowns like Paul Babeu aka Studboi1, and Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio. They demean the office of sheriff and destroy the credibility of professional law enforcement officers with whom they serve with their political antics.

How many millions of dollars has Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio already cost the taxpayers of Maricopa County with his unprofessional and unethical misconduct?

For example, Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio and his unholy alliance with right-wing conspiracy organizations like World Net Daily (Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation into President Obama’s birth certificate),  and Larry Klayman, a disreputable attorney and founder of Freedom Watch Inc., the former Chairman of Judicial Watch, who filed a lawsuit challenging President Obama’s recent executive orders on immigration deferrals of prosecution.

An appointed sheriff would never be able to get away with this kind of partisan political activity and whoring for publicity. They would be fired in a heartbeat for unprofessional and unethical misconduct. Crazy Uncle Joe Arpaio would have been history long ago if county sheriff was an appointed office. Food for thought . . . and a ballot measure in 2016.

Read more