IOKIYAR: President Willard ‘Mittens’ Romney’s executive orders

The high priest of Beltway centrism, political scientist Norm Ornstein, writing at The Atlantic takes another look at those executive orders that President Willard “Mittens” Romney promised he would sign on “Day One in office” — that thankfully never came to pass for this pretentious Plutocrat. Mitt Romney’s Executive Actions That Never Were:

[M]y exchange with [Stuart Stevens, Mitt Romney’s campaign manager] prompted me to remember a central pledge from the Romney campaign in 2012—effectively to blow up Obamacare through executive action. Here, in the words of Lanhee Chen, Romney’s domestic-policy guru, is what Romney would have done from his first day in office, without trying to compromise with or negotiate with Congress:

romney say anythingA Democratic Senate would probably have blocked efforts to repeal Obamacare, leaving Romney to halt or reverse the law through executive action. As promised, he would have found a way to issue waivers from Obamacare to states so that they could pursue their own health-care reforms.

But at the end of the day, Obamacare would still be the law, partisan gridlock would still cast its shadow over the policy-making process, and President Romney’s executive actions would be the source of myriad legal challenges from the law’s supporters.

Let’s consider each of these actions separately. First, thwarted by the Democratic-controlled Senate, Romney would have issued an executive order suspending the establishment of the Obamacare exchanges, freezing funding for implementation of the law and creating broad exemptions from the individual mandate.

He also would have suspended or rewritten any regulations issued by the Obama administration that had the potential to increase health insurance costs, displace patients from their existing health insurance coverage, or restrict choices for consumers.

Read more

The overlooked impact of remittances

The movement of people across national borders is a worldwide phenomenon. Mex CA MapAccording to UN data, there are 232 million international migrants in the world, a little over 3% of the world’s population. A sizeable number of Americans reside or work outside of the United States. An estimated 6.2 million Americans (excluding military) live abroad. Over 1.5 million reside in Europe, another 2.5 million live in Western Hemisphere countries other than the United States.

Due to the flow of undocumented migrants coming across the border with Mexico, immigration policy has become a hotly disputed political issue in the United States. Other than agreeing that undocumented migrants should not be shot, American politicians can’t agree on immigration policy priorities or how to deal with the estimated 11.7 million undocumented people residing in the country. In an attempt to resolve the matter, the U.S. Senate passed a massive immigration bill that greatly enhanced border security, changed visa requirements and regularized the status of many migrants.

Read more

About that other Executive Order (the Emancipation Proclamation)

Confederale SoldiersThe modern-day GOP long ago ceased to be the “Party of Lincoln” when it adopted a Southern strategy to absorb Southern white segregationists who abandoned the Democratic Party after President Lyndon Johnson committed the party to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting rights Act of 1964, and the GOP embraced the politics of racial polarization.

Nancy LeTourneau at the Political Animal Blog has an interesting post about an article by Doug Muder, Not a Tea Party, a Confederate Party, in which LeTourneau argues that the modern-day GOP is a Neo-Confederate insurgency, something I have been warning you about for years.  Understanding the Threat of a Confederate Insurgency.

So it should come as no surprise that in all of their hyperventilating and pearl clutching over President Obama’s executive orders regarding immigration, the modern-day GOP does not want to discuss the precedent of an executive order by that other president from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln, issued during the Civil War: the Emancipation Proclamation.

Read more

Couple of odds and ends post-President Obama executive order announcement

Crossposted at DemocraticDiva.com

Here’s the very first bill filed in the Georgia Senate for their upcoming session.

First Reader Summary
PF: A BILL to be entitled an Act to amend Chapters 5, 11, and 16 of Title 40 of the O.C.G.A., relating to drivers’ licenses, abandoned motor vehicles, and the Department of Driver Services, respectively, so as to provide that persons who possess a lawful alien status are the only category of noncitizens who may obtain a license, permit, or card; to require the Department of Driver Services to participate in the Records and Information from DMVs for E-Verify initiative of the United States Department of Homeland Security; to provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes…

…”
(11) ‘Lawful alien status’ means an alien status provided for by the federal Immigration
26
and Nationality Act or any other provision by the United States Congress; provided,
27
however, that lawful alien status shall not include a grant of any deferred deportation
28
action from the United States Department of Homeland Security

What babies.

Read more

Legal basis for Executive Orders on immigration

ImmigrantsThe Office of Legal Counsel to the President last night released a legal opinion that lays out the legal authority and precedents for President Obama’s executive orders on the use of prosecutorial discretion to defer deportations. The Department of Homeland Security’s Authority to Prioritize Removal of Certain Aliens Unlawfully Present in the United States and to Defer Removal of Others (.pdf).

Moreover, a group of leading legal scholars has written a letter declaring Obama’s action is well within his legal authority to exercise broad discretion over how to employ the nation’s enforcement machinery. Legal Scholars: Obama’s Immigration Actions Lawful:

President Barack Obama’s announced immigration executive actions are lawful, a group of ten prominent legal scholars wrote in a Joint Letter (Scribd) shared by the White House with TIME.

Pushing back on Republicans who have blasted Obama’s action as unconstitutional and unlawful, the signatories include Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe, conservative legal scholar Eric Posner, and former Yale Law School Dean and former State Department Legal Advisor Harold Hongju Koh.

Read more