Once upon a time, before 2017, executive orders were used by presidents to direct the operations of government, within the limits of the law. You know, like memos. With a little presidential flair. But here we are in 2025, and Trump is back…with a vengeance. Only now, he’s fully abandoned the illusion that he’s constrained by anything resembling checks and balances.
Under the Mar-a-Law Administration, executive orders aren’t guidance; they’re declarations. Streamlined, centralized, and completely untethered from process. They’re often previewed, echoed, and tantrum-tweeted partially on Truth Social, soaked in grievance and self-congratulation, sometimes clarified and debuted with flair in the Oval Office, then rubber-stamped by federal agencies like scripture handed down from on high.
A Brief History of Executive Orders
For those who slept through civics class, here’s the gist: Executive orders are meant to instruct government on how to implement existing law. EOs were never meant to create new laws from thin air. That’s still Congress’s job, at least on paper.
Presidents from both parties have issued executive orders. Some justified, some not. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation? Bold and history-making. FDR’s internment order? A shameful abuse of power. The tool itself isn’t the problem. It’s how it’s used, or in Trump’s case, how it’s abused (aka weaponized).
Trump’s Executive Order Free-for-All
In his second term, Trump doesn’t bother pretending to care where his executive authority ends. He drops executive order snippets onto Truth Social during what we can only assume are toilet-sitting brainstorming sessions, treating them like press releases rather than governing tools. Legal review? Optional. Agencies fall in line anyway. These aren’t routine directives. They’re sweeping declarations that often contradict existing law, bypass Congress entirely, and reshape policy in real time.
This isn’t Trump’s first time steamrolling democracy and he knows no one’s stepping in to stop him. Back in his first term, he set the tone, like it was merely a dress rehearsal. Now he’s actively funneling federal money wherever he pleases and inventing legal powers like he’s writing fan fiction. He acts, posts, signs, and dares anyone to grow a spine.
The Rubber-Stamp Response
What’s worse than an overreaching president? A Congress that bends the knee. Once again, elected officials—Republicans plus a few cowardly Democrats—stand by, offering nothing more than performative approval as Trump signs one legally dubious executive order after another.
And I’ve got some news for you, enablers: it’s time to update your resumes. You’re making yourselves obsolete. Just like all those civil servants Trump let Musk purge in his campaign to gut the “deep state,” you’re next. What does Trump need you for anymore, beyond clapping and nodding on cue? You can do that from home, unofficially. Might even save the government some money.
This Is Not a Constitutional Crisis; It’s the Aftermath
We’re past the crisis point. A constitutional crisis happens when the system stops working. What we’re living in now is what comes after: one branch hoards power and the others surrender theirs entirely. Trump governs through edict. Congress cowers. And the courts? They’ve been packed, undermined, or sidelined, depending on the day.
The Constitution is still there, technically. But like a fire alarm in a burned-down building, it doesn’t help much after the damage is done.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your principled stance against Trump’s executive orders would look more principled had you objected to President Biden’s many court-overturned executive orders involving student loan forgiveness, COVID vaccination mandates, minimum wage for federal contracts, DACA, project labor agreements, and ending Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy.
But before I criticize you for hypocrisy, did you object to the overturned Biden executive orders? I do not want to assume such.
Ah, Senator Kavanagh. Always a delight when one of Arizona’s most dependable MAGA minions drops in with a fresh “what about?” deflection.
Since you almost resisted assuming, I’ll go ahead and answer: yes, I’ve raised concerns when Biden’s executive orders were overturned, because that’s how a constitutional system is supposed to function. The courts review, the politician respects the ruling, writers on both sides opine, and no one pretends they’re above the Constitution. Biden respects that process. Trump? He attacks judges, bullies the press, and treats the Constitution like a menu as if it’s useful only when it serves him.
So no, this isn’t apples to apples. One president operates within a legal framework. The other cosplays as a dictator with delusions of godhood. Trump doesn’t just push limits. He refuses to recognize they exist. He issues sweeping executive orders without legal grounding, posts them like proclamations, and expects immediate obedience. Whether he follows the law depends entirely on whether it flatters him.
If you’re genuinely concerned about executive overreach, great. But if that concern only kicks in when a Democrat picks up a pen, spare me the performance. The rule of law isn’t supposed to be a partisan accessory.
The day Trump respects and abides by a court ruling without whining about it is the day I’ll believe your outrage isn’t just partisan cosplay.
Thanks for stopping by. Toodle-oo! And try not to trip over your double standard on the way out.
@Sen. Kavanagh –
Still helping everyone reach their daily dosage of deflection, I see.
Rationalizing bad acts by saying that someone else did the same thing doesn’t make those acts less bad.
It is very Trumpian, though.