The Arizona Corporation Commission voted last week (in a 4 to 1 margin with only Democratic Commissioner Anna Tovar voting against) to have its staff start drafting a repeal of renewable standards in place since 2006.
Suffice it to say, former Corporation Commissioner Sandra Kennedy and Commission Candidates Ylenia Aguilar and Joshua Polacheck think this MAGA aversion to renewable energy is not a great idea.
Each responded to requests for comment from Blog for Arizona.
Ms. Aguilar responded:
“This decision by the Arizona Corporation Commission not only risks harming the environment but also threatens to drive away businesses, jobs, and millions of dollars invested in an industry that employs more than 8,000 Arizonans. When elected, I would work to ensure that we are making decisions that prioritize the well-being of Arizona families and businesses.”
Mr. Polacheck offered:
“It’s deeply disappointing that the current majority on the Corporation Commission is more interested in playing politics rather than fighting for affordable, reliable, and secure power for Arizona families and businesses. With this decision, they are betraying the Commission’s core mission of ensuring safe, reliable, and affordable utility services. Instead of providing a clear and stable regulatory regime that allows our public utilities to continue to make the necessary investments in Arizona’s energy independence through clean energy technology, they are providing a regulatory subsidy to out-of-state and foreign fossil fuel interests. Who’s benefiting from this decision? Not Arizona families and businesses.”
Former Commissioner Kennedy wrote:
“Arizona’s Renewable Energy Standard (RES), established over a decade ago, has played a pivotal role in promoting sustainable and environmentally friendly energy practices. However, the recent proposal by the Arizona Corporation Commission’s utility regulators to remove this standard has sparked a contentious debate. While the large utility companies argue for increased rates to support infrastructure development, it is crucial to consider the long-term consequences of abandoning a proven mechanism for promoting renewable energy.
The RES has been a cornerstone of Arizona’s commitment to environmental responsibility. Its removal could undermine the state’s progress toward a cleaner energy future, contributing to climate change and jeopardizing the well-being of future generations. Advocates argue that maintaining the RES is essential for reducing carbon emissions and fostering a more sustainable energy landscape.
The renewable energy sector has become a significant source of job creation and economic growth. By abandoning the RES, Arizona risks losing out on the economic benefits associated with the booming clean energy industry. A transition away from renewable energy could stifle innovation and hinder the state’s potential to become a leader in the green economy.
Relying on conventional energy sources leaves Arizona vulnerable to fluctuations in global fuel prices. The RES has provided a framework for diversifying the energy mix, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and enhancing energy security. Removing this standard could expose the state to economic volatility associated with traditional energy sources.
While utility companies argue for rate increases to fund infrastructure projects, it is essential to scrutinize the potential burden on consumers. The RES has demonstrated that investing in renewable energy can lead to cost reductions over time. Abandoning this standard may result in higher utility bills for consumers, offsetting any short-term benefits gained from increased rates.
The RES has been in place for over a decade, providing a stable foundation for the growth of renewable energy in Arizona. Removing it without a clear and comprehensive alternative could create uncertainty in the market, potentially hindering the state’s ability to meet future energy demands sustainably.
In conclusion, the proposal to remove Arizona’s Renewable Energy Standard must be approached with caution. While utility companies advocate for rate increases to support infrastructure development, the long-term consequences of abandoning a proven mechanism for promoting renewable energy should not be overlooked. Striking a balance between environmental responsibility and economic considerations is crucial for ensuring a sustainable and prosperous future for Arizona. The Commission must carefully evaluate the implications of such a decision and explore alternative strategies that prioritize both the environment and the economy.”
Sadly, the current majority of the Arizona Corporation Commission seems fascinated by the policies of yesterday.
This November, voters should elect a new Commission majority that emphasizes the energy standards of tomorrow.