by David Safier
I saw the film, The Informant!, yesterday. Amusing, quirky film. But before the show, I was taken by the fact that almost all the films previewed dealt with looming disasters, end-of-the-world scenarios, and towns (in one case the entire world) populated with vampires.
Films, and art in general, tap into the prevailing zeitgeist. Clearly, the combination of post 9/11 fears with the economic uncertainties of the day can lead to "the world as we know it is ending" plot lines. But during the depression, lots of the films were of the Fred Astaire/Cary Grant variety — tuxes and tails, no worries, songs like "We're in the money." We seem to be going the other way.
And vampires? The vampire genre was picked up by films almost from the beginning (the silent German classic, Nosferatu, is the best early example), but why are there scads of vampire shows on TV and more at the movies right now? And the vampires aren't always evil like they were in the past. There are the good blood suckers and the bad blood suckers.
I can't figure it out.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I don’t know.
Offhand I’d blame Joss Whedon and Anne Rice, they pretty well defined the more modern vampire dama, with the bloodsuckers being cast as more morally nuanced than the straight up evil they used to be.
Twilight is a gargantuan hit (we were up on the Olympic Peninsula this summer and the Pacific side, centered around Forks, is ‘all-angsty-goth-preteen-all-the-time’… ) and would naturally spawn many imitators, but it seems like horror flicks as a whole have been on an upswing.
I’m sure you’re right, there’s some pop psych explanation for it. “displaced anxiety from economic downturn” etc etc etc.
Suffice to say that, imo, Twilight sucks (pun intended), True Blood friggin’ rocks, all the rest are derivative crap…
…and Buffy would still kick ALL their asses.
Plus Hollywood also employs about 500X more copiers than writers…