Progressives Shut Out of Koch Brothers Medicaid Forum

Loft2013-03-07-2-sm72-sigby Pamela Powers Hannley

Thanks to publicity on this blog, social media, and e-mail blasts, progressives and other Democrats came to the Americans for Prosperity "public forum" on Medicaid expansion last night at The Loft Cinema. Too bad we couldn't get in.

Approximately 20 pro-healthcare reform advocates, plus six journalism students, and two bloggers were shut out of the tightly controlled forum. In addition, City Councilman Steve Kozachik was "uninvited" to participate in the panel. Although public announcements of the event in the Tucson Weekly, the Arizona Daily Star, and the Pima County GOP website didn't say that reservations were required, the only people who were admitted were those who RSVP'd to the Koch Brothers' Americans for Prosperity e-mail blast, linked to this article.

The only two members of Progressive Democrats of American (PDA) Tucson who were admitted are both doctors. (Of course, they were not wearing PDA Healthcare Not Warfare stickers. None of us holding the banner in front of The Loft or trying to distribute Healthcare Not Warfare stickers got in.)

After the jump, read a first hand account by Dr. Eve Shapiro, head of PDA Tucson's healthcare reform issue organizing team, and more about Koz and job creation with Medicaid expansion.

From Shapiro…

We stayed for almost the first hour. Tom Betlatch, director of AHCCCS, spoke first and gave a very good overview of AHCCCS, Prop 204, and the current state of the uninsured and the effect on the hospitals, etc. He also read some stories from their website about people losing insurance and facing death.

Don Hughes spoke next; he is [Governor Jan] Brewer's health policy advisor. He talked about Brewer's struggle with the issue and why she chose to go with the expansion (I think as a way to get the audience to see why Republicans should support it). He also talked about the effect on rural hospitals of increasing the uninsured population.

Next Tom Jenney (from Americans for Prosperity) spoke and said a lot of inaccurate information about AHCCCS: its a bad program that gives poor care, it would cost the state a lot of money, etc. At one point, he said doctors are fleeing AHCCCS at which point Paul [Shapiro's husband] and I yelled out that that wasn't true and that we are physicians. I think he lost his cool a little at that point.

Betlatch responded by asking what proposal Jenney would make instead and challenged some of his statements as not factual. Jenney couldn't answer and acknowledged that he had no alternative. Hughes challenged him about the value of AHCCCS. The next speaker was [former State Senator] Frank Antonori, and we decided we couldn't stand any more and left.

The audience was pretty significantly oriented to Jenney's group [Americans for Prosperity], although many of us clapped for Betlatch and Hughes. [Former State Representative] Dr. Matt Heinz was up to speak after Antonori, and Dr. Jane Orient was there as well (libertarian doctor). The audeince was obviously a lot smaller than we had anticipated, since it was in the new room at the Loft which probably doesn't seat mores than 100 people.  I doubt any minds were changed, since the people there only cared about taxes. I think they represent a small group, though, and I doubt it will have any impact on the debate. The event was recorded. [Emphasis added.]

It's really too bad that the venue was small and that the journalism students, bloggers, and people with differing viewpoints were not allowed into the theater. I had my video camera and was ready to record the event– as I have with other truly public, bipartisan forums. We should have expected this. Prior to the event, Tea Party organizers played politics with the panel invitees. Initially, Kozichik was to represent the Grand Canyon Institute on the panel, but he was uninvited. State Senator Steve Farley was billed as being on the panel, but word is that he may have declined to participate because of the pre-event gamesmanship with the panel. 

Did the Tea Party dump Koz from the program because they're still pissed off about his defection from the Republican Party, or did they not want the Grand Canyon Institute's message heard– and taped? According to a report from the Grand Canyon Institute, Medicaid expansion would save the Arizona general fund $1.2 billion and create 21,000 jobs. (Read the full report here.)

Create jobs and save billions? That's not a message the Koch Brothers want people to hear; instead, they want to spoon feed the public messages like the one from last night's anti-Obamacare movie, Sick and Sicker. It is a scare tactic hit piece about expansion of coverage and long wait times for doctor visits in Canada. The movie trailer includes quotes from a doctor who predicts that Americans will die waiting for healthcare if the Affordable Care Act is allowed to go forward and cover more of the uninsured. The key point that is left out? People are dying now because they don't have access to care or they delay care because of the cost.

Since so many voices were shut out of this forum, the sole video record will show a homogeneous audience opposed to healthcare reform and big guv'mint. It's ironic that the Tea Party, which claims to be all about preserving the Constitution, shut out the public voice and the media.

0 responses to “Progressives Shut Out of Koch Brothers Medicaid Forum

  1. Francine Shacter

    My dear, Your biases are screamingly obvious!!!! Intentionally limiting the audience to people who will only agree with you is scuzzy at best. It also shows that you don’t believe you have a strong enough case, on the merits, to carry the day. Very anti-democratic. Terribly sad.

  2. Serious Shade

    As I thought. It was just a facade of objectivity–that rant against Kozochik reveals your true colors. And I don’t even live in Pima County.

  3. Sure, let’s blame Kozachik for poverty in Tucson. Good one!

  4. Christine Bauserman

    Once again Pamela spews forth inaccuracies and misinformation. The Grand Canyon Institute was invited to participate in the panel as a counter to Americans For Prosperity. Matt Laos declined so Representative Farley was invited and he accepted. After the panel was full the Grand Canyon Institute asked if Steve K. could participate and was told “no the panel was full”. Former Representative Matt Hein and Dr. Eve Shapiro along with 3 others from hospitals and insurance companies were also told the panel was full. Hein and Shapiro were both asked to be “backups” in case the reps. were unable to leave Phoenix and guess what? That is what happened. So Hein replaced Farley. So lets see: FOR: 2 from Governors office, Hein, Dr. John – 2+1+1 = 4. AGAINST: Tom Jenney, Antenori, Dr. Orient: 1+1+1 = 3.
    Does this help?
    Steve K is a city councilman and I do not think anyone really cares about his opinon on State run welfare programs. For Pete’s sake the guy can’t do his own job, Tucson is the 6th poorest city in the US, under his leadership, and facing huge budget deficits, so who in the world would we want his advice on running a billion dollar program?
    I thought Dr. Schapiro would have been a wonderful panelist but if she indeed said the above it is too bad she is so closed minded that she will not even listen to the views of other doctors and paramedics like Antenori, Hein, Newport, and Orient. And her angry outburst was downright rude.
    FYI: The LOFT shut the door. Fire codes allowed a 98 person maximium. On top of some math lessons how about working on what RSVP.

  5. Except for Mark Evans from the TucsonCitizen.com (who was there with his journalism students) I saw no evidence of anyone associated with the media.

    I think putting this event in a small venue at The Loft– instead of the large theater where everyone assumed it would be– was a tactic to ensure control of the audience, the microphones, the message, and any resulting video.

  6. The “Kochtopus”-funded Americans For Prosperity and Tea Party are all about staging astroturf events for the media. Although the Daily Star and Tucson Weekly advertised this “public” forum, I do not yet find any reporting on this event in those publications. Good job Pamela.