Romney goes all in on GOP Southern Strategy of race-baiting

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Lee Atwater was a political consultant from South Carolina who was the protégé
of Harry S. Dent. In 1968 Harry Dent devised something called the "southern strategy" for the Presidential campaign of Richard Nixon.

The "Southern strategy" called for winning elections in Southern states by exploiting anti–African American racism and fears of lawlessness among Southern white voters and appealing to fears of growing federal power in social and economic matters (generally lumped under the concept of "states' rights").

Lee Atwater developed the mythical Cadillac driving "Welfare Queen" for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and approved the "Willie Horton" ad against Michael Dukakis in 1988. The "Willie Horton" ad was the product of Floyd Brown, an original co-founder of Citizens United and still active in the conservative movement, and Larry McCarthy, a veteran media consultant who specializes in attack ads for the GOP who is currently one of the leaders of Willard "Mittens" Romney's advertising campaign. Three more evil sonsuvbitches you are never going to meet.

But Lee Atwater, at least, on his deathbed reportedly is said to have asked Black Americans for their
forgiveness in using them as a "pawn" to attract white voters to the
candidates that had hired him. The other two sonsuvbitches remain unrepentent.

The GOP "southern strategy" is back, and is now central to the Willard "Mittens" Romney campaign.

In an interview in USA Today this weekend, Romney accused President Obama of gutting the welfare work requirements to "shore up his base.“ Interview: Romney blasts Obama for a 'vituperative' campaign:

Romney defends the welfare ads as accurate, accusing Obama of offering state waivers as a political calculation designed to "shore up his base" for the election.

Romney's welfare ads are NOT accurate, they have been fact checked and declared false by every fact checking media organization, yet his campaign keeps producing more ads on this theme. Romney is blowing the dog whistle of the politics of resentment for the poor (and race-baiting minorities).

The Washington Post’s fact checker, Glenn Kessler, gave the welfare ads his lowest rating, four Pinocchios. The Tampa Bay Times’s Politifact was equally harsh,
describing the ads as “a drastic distortion” warranting a “pants on
fire” rating. The welfare commercial, according to Politifact, “inflames
old resentments about able-bodied adults sitting around collecting
public assistance.”

[UPDATE: CNN ("Fact check: Romney's welfare claims wrong"); FactCheck.org ("It's simply not true")]

The New York Times’ Tom Edsall writes today that "the Romney campaign is clearly determined 'to make this about' race, in the tradition of the notorious 1988 Republican Willie Horton ad,
which described the rape of a white woman by a convicted
African-American murderer released on furlough from a Massachusetts
prison during the gubernatorial administration of Michael Dukakis and
Jesse Helms’s equally infamous 'White Hands'
commercial, which depicted a white job applicant who 'needed that job'
but was rejected because 'they had to give it to a minority.'" Making the Election About Race:

The Romney campaign’s shift of focus toward welfare and Medicare
suggests that his strategists are worried that just disparaging Obama’s
ability to deal with the struggling economy won’t be adequate to produce
victory on November 6.

The importance to the Romney-Ryan ticket
of two overlapping constituencies — whites without college degrees and
white Medicare recipients — cannot be overestimated. Romney, continuing
the Republican approach of 2010, is banking on a huge turnout among key
white segments of the electorate in order to counter Obama’s strengths
with minority voters as well as with young and unmarried female voters
of all races.

There is extensive poll data showing the depth of Republican dependence on white voters.

* * *

[T]he Pew surveys show that 89% of voters who identify themselves as
Republican are white. Faced with few if any possibilities of making
gains among blacks and Hispanics — whose support for Obama has remained
strong — the Romney campaign has no other choice if the goal is to win
but to adopt a strategy to drive up white turnout.

The Romney campaign is willing to disregard criticism concerning accuracy and veracity in favor of  “blowing the dog whistle of racism” – resorting to a campaign appealing to racial symbols, images and issues in its bid to break the frustratingly persistent Obama lead in the polls, which has lasted for the past 10 months.

The Washington Post's Jamelle Bouie similarly writes at the Plum Line today, In final stretch, Mitt Romney channels Lee Atwater:

For the last month, the Romney campaign has been running with a new
strategy: blatant appeals to racial resentment. The welfare ads, which
falsely accuse President Obama of “gutting” welfare reform, were the
first sign of this shift. It continued in subtler form with attacks on
Obamacare — accusing Obama of taking from Medicare recipients and giving
the revenues to his supporters — and became explicit again with last
Friday’s “joke” about the president’s birth certificate.

At this point, in fact, Romney has stopped trying to hide the extent
to which he wants to “otherize” Obama as a president for nonwhites. In
an interview
with USA Today this weekend, he defended the welfare ads by accusing
Obama of offering waivers as a political calculation designed to “shore
up his base.”

At best, Romney means Obama’s “base” is made up of welfare recipients. . .

[Tim Noah of The New Republic provides the translation, as if any is needed: President Obama doesn’t represent you; he represents a lot of people on welfare. And you know what they look like.]

* * *

With blacks, Latinos and other nonwhites so adamantly opposed to the
GOP, Romney’s only hope for winning the election is massive turnout from
white voters. Indeed, according to Ron Brownstein,
Romney needs to capture 61 percent of white voters to win, assuming
they turn out at 2008 levels. Moreover, it seems clear Obama retains the
support of a critical number of white voters. His approval rating
reached 50 percent in the latest Post/ABC poll, and as Greg notes, he leads Romney in understanding the economic concerns of ordinary Americans.

The attacks on welfare and Medicare are crude, but they are one of
the few things that could lead white voters — and downscale whites in
particular — to doubt Obama’s concern for people like them. Which is
why, despite widespread criticism and condemnation, Romney will press
forward with these attacks.

So what's next, Mittens? Are you going to open your campaign in Philadelphia, Missississippi after the GOP convention, just as Ronald Reagan did, to deliver a speech on "states' rights" where civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner were murdered in cold blood by klansmen during "Freedom Summer"? Reagan's Neshoba County Fair "states' rights" speech. Or maybe in Selma, Alabama at the foot of the Edmund Pettus Bridge where civil rights marchers were attacked by Alabama state troopers on "Bloody Sunday," and Congressman John Lewis was nearly beaten to death. What's the plan, Mittens? I want to know.

Back in 2005, Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman said the GOP's "southern strategy" was wrong and apologized to the NAACP Convention. GOP: 'We were wrong' to play racial politics:

"Some Republicans gave up on winning the African-American vote, looking
the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial
polarization," Mehlman said at the annual convention of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People. "I am here today as
the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong."

Mehlman's apology was quickly denounced by the man who leads the GOP today, and from whom the Romney campaign takes its messaging: racist Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh blasted Mehlman's renunciation of GOP racial tactics: "Republicans are going to go bend over and grab the ankles".

There is no place in the 21st Century for such racist politics. The media villagers have an obligation to confront this "southern strategy" race-bailitng head-on and to condemn it, and to hold the Romney campaign and the GOP accountable for their racist strategy. Your failure to do so makes you a complict accomplice in this crime against your fellow Americans.


Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Romney goes all in on GOP Southern Strategy of race-baiting”

  1. It isn’t just who can’t get “those people” to vote. They don’t vote because they do not see themselves as having the power to change anything, certainly a national election. Many of them are correctly entirely engrossed with trying to survive in a society they don’t feel a part of – which is terribly sad. And not good for our democracy.

  2. This, like the Arizona Republicans’ “let’s insult Latinos every day” strategy, can work in the short term, but the long-term demographics will make this a loser at the polls in the near future as the American electorate becomes more and more diverse until whites will be a minority of voters (they will be a minority of the population much sooner, and in Arizona, you can count the years before non-Hispanic whites are a minority — as they currently are for Arizonans under 25).

    They can trot out Mia Love all they want — they are pretty much hiding Herman Cain and Allan West in the same place they put Alan Keyes years ago — but essentially the Republicans are just not attuned to multiethnic, multicultural, multiracial America. I spent the weekend at the national Afropunk Festival in New York, with thousand of mostly young people of all backgrounds. They were signing up people to vote, and when NYC Councilmember Letitia James told everyone to vote for Obama, it was duh, sure, if we vote. I’ve seen the same kinds of young crowds elsewhere, like at the Odd Future concert this winter in Tempe.

    The problem is that while Obama would easily win a majority among the people eligible to vote, and he’d do it in Arizona too, a lot of the people who would, duh, vote for Obama, never Romney; Carmona, never Flake; etc. — either aren’t registered or don’t bother to vote.

    If everyone who voted in 2008 — all those hip, cool kids who suddenly became political experts when Obamania struck — had voted in 2010, the “wave” GOP election and House takeover would never have happened.

    Why can’t the Democrats motivate these people to vote? You can blame the Republicans all you want for their racist appeals, and you can blame the people for not registering or voting, but what are the Democrats doing wrong in that they can’t get their likely voters to the polls?

Comments are closed.