The GOP culture of corruption and faith based supply-side ‘trickle down’ economics is destroying Arizona

I warned you that this was coming years ago in The First Rule of Holes Revisited:

Hole[O]ur Tea-Publican legislature passed in a Special Session what was laughingly labeled a “jobs bill” — it was, in fact a corporate welfare tax-giveaway plan. The GOP’s double dose of poison to kill Arizona:

Senate Bill 1001 is filled with tax breaks and incentives for businesses large and small. The legislative budget office estimated its cost at $538 million by 2018 [worsening Arizona’s structural revenue deficit], when all the tax cuts are phased in.

* * *

Brewer’s advisors acknowledged that there is no guarantee the changes would yield enough new investment and jobs to offset the anticipated revenue loss.

La Bruja‘s corporate welfare tax-giveaway plan is being phased in since 2014. Additional tax cuts enacted by our lawless Tea-Publican legislature since 2011 are also being phased in. Their blind faith in supply-side “trickle down” GOP economics is now coming home to roost as these corporate welfare tax-giveaways are digging the structural revenue deficit hole deeper as designed.

Read more

Prop. 123 preserves corporate welfare tax cuts at the expense of education

Despite Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan having been dilatory with a public notice about submitting comments on Prop. 123 for the Special Election pamphlet that will go out to voters, and  most of the GOP-friendly media that has lined up behind Prop, 123 having failed to report that information, More than four dozen file statements opposing Prop. 123:

More than four dozen statements in opposition to Proposition 123 were submitted to Secretary of State Michele Reagan. They will be included in a pamphlet that will be mailed to the homes of all registered voters ahead of the May 17 special election.

The list of foes is not quite like the veritable Who’s Who in business, politics and education, all of whom submitted their own statements in support. That includes Gov. Doug Ducey, House Speaker David Gowan, Arizona Education Association President Andrew Morrill and an assortment of business leaders.

All cite the same theme of getting more money into classrooms without raising taxes. [The First Commandment of the GOP.]

Opponents, however, point up what they see as flaws in the measure. But the question remains whether they can mount any organized opposition to what promises to be a well-financed campaign.

DeWitAt this point the de facto leader appears to be state Treasurer Jeff DeWit.

He waged an unsuccessful effort during the special session to derail the plan, arguing it is not financially sound. DeWit also submitted his own statement of opposition, as did wife Marina and mother Jana.

But he has so far made no efforts to actually organize an opposition campaign — or even raise any money.

“I want to do something,” he told Capitol Media Services. “But I really don’t know what that entails yet.”

Read more

Prop. 123 will do little to restore education funding to K-12 schools

Last Thursday a new report from the Children’s Action Alliance, Arizona 3rd Worst in Cuts to K-12 Education, said state funding of public schools will still be $863 million below pre-recession levels, even if voters approve taking more money out of the state land trust fund to use for education. Study: Proposal won’t bring funding of AZ schools to pre-recession level:

The analysis by the Children’s Action Alliance comes as by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (.pdf) finds that Arizona cut a bigger chunk out of education funding between 2009 and 2014 than any other state. It pegged the loss in dollars at 23.3 percent.

Screenshot from 2015-12-14 13:36:58

Arizona, which was heavily dependent on revenues from population growth and construction, got hit particularly hard when the housing bubble burst.

Even with funds put back into education spending in the past two years, state aid to students in Arizona is still close to 15 percent less than in 2009 when inflation is taken into account, said Dana Naimark, president of the Children’s Action Alliance.

Read more

State Treasurer Jeff DeWit considering suing state for misleading voters on Prop. 123

DeWitArizona State Treasurer Jeff DeWit is considering suing the state for adopting misleading statements for the ballot explanation for Prop. 123, the school funding inflation adjustment settlement to Cave Creek Unified School Dist. et al. v. Ducey, at the Special Election scheduled for May 2016.

I provided you with the language of the laws at issue in yesterday’s post, Deadline for public comments on Prop. 123, school inflation, which you will need to reference because Howard Fischer and the Arizona Daily Star do not provide it in this report, Lawmakers OK wording of school funding proposition:

State lawmakers voted Thursday to approve an explanation of Proposition 123 over objections by state Treasurer Jeff DeWit that it is misleading — and probably illegal.

And now he is weighing whether to ask a court to intercede ahead of the May 17 election to change the distribution formula for state land trust proceeds — and possibly refusing to comply with the law even if voters approve it.

Read more

Deadline for public comments on Prop. 123, school inflation funding settlement, are due Friday

DeWitArizona State Treasurer Jeff DeWit strongly opposes Governor Doug Ducey’s plan to settle the Prop. 301 school funding inflation adjustment case, Cave Creek Unified School Dist. et al v. Ducey, by raiding the state trust lands fund for K-12 education for ten years, if approved by voters at the May 2016 Special Election (Prop. 123).

DeWit insists that this change to the state trust lands fund formula for distribution requires congressional approval because it modifies the Arizona Statehood and Enabling Act. Governor Ducey, relying on the opinion of the Republican Party’s attorney, Mike Liburdi, says that Congress does not have to approve Prop. 123.

Here is what is annoying the hell out of me. The lazy media villagers in this state keep reporting this pissing match between the Governor and the State Treasurer, but despite the fact that they both claim to have a legal opinion supporting their position, no news outlet, to my knowledge, has actually published or provided a link to the legal opinion on which each man is relying (perhaps they have not released these legal opinions to the media, which begs the question, why is the media not demanding that these legal opinions be produced to the media?)

The lazy media villagers also keep referencing comments made by the Governor’s office and GOP attorney Mike Liburdi about the 1999 amendments to the Arizona Statehood and Enabling Act, but to my knowledge, they never actually publish or provide a link to the 1999 amendments to better inform the public.

The reporting on this issue is occurring in a vacuum, and the public is being poorly served and ill-informed by the media.

Read more