Posted by Bob Lord
Earlier today, BlogForArizona reported on Mitt's investment in Stericycle, a firm that handles the disposal of aborted fetuses.
http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/2012/07/romney-stericycle-and-aborted-fetuses.html#more
So continues the drip, drip, drip of unsavory snippets from Mitt's past. You could see this coming a mile away. Mitt has not been careful with his activities and statements, financial and otherwise, his entire life, all the way up to 2010, when he was stupid enough to leave investments in Switzerland and the Caymans for all to see when he released his tax return. He has done and said whatever worked best for hinm at the time, with little regard for long=term implications. Thus, he was a moderate when it suited his desire to be the Governor of Massachusetts, but "severely conservative" when he wanted Tea Partiers to choose him over Rick Santorum. He largely could avoid major damage on this front when he was running against a bunch of cash-strapped right wingers whose Presidential ambitions never were all that serious and who didn't bother to do quality oppo research. But now he's playing in an entirely different leage. Quite clearly, the Obama team took its opposition research seriously and we're going to see a steady release, item by item, from an oppostion research book they've that is probably four inches thick. The Bain Capital chapter of that book is perhaps the longest, but it's certainly not the only chapter. We've already heard a little about his Cranbrook High exploits.
Think about it. If we're hearing about Stericycle and Cranbrook HIgh now, what will we be hearing about in September? Will the release of any one item be devastating to Romney? No. But each item impacts a pool of voters uniquely and places that pool beyond Romney's reach. For example, most voters aren't going to vote against Romney because they learned that he was a bully in high school. But bullying victims, their parents, children and siblings will have a lot of trouble voting for Romney. In addiion, the cumulative effect of the opposition research on Romney, come November, will be substantial.
If the economy tanks, all bets of course are off. Otherwise, the Obama campaign strategy appears impressive. First, use Romney's campaign statements and record at Bain and as Mass Gov to define him as elitist, far right, out of touch, and a flip-flopper, while letting Romney handle the unlikeable part for himself. Second, define the election as a choice between Romney's reinstitution of Bush's failed policies and the policies Obama has implemented to put us back on the right track. Third, run up the score with voting blocks where Romney is weak — Latinos, LGBT, single women, etc. And fourth, use all that opposition research to turn random voters and keep Romney on defense far more than he wants to be.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/the-book-on-mitt-romney-here-is-john-mccains-ent He doesn’t get this stuff wrong very often. His cred is on the line. I found it top be very well put together, plausible opp. file….we already know that a good part of this is true from reports now coming into view. I think there is much more where this came from. None of it good…for Romney.
Makes sense as to why McCain opted to pass on this guy. WAY too much baggage.
Cheri: I’m curious as to where this comes from. It seems wonderful and devastating, but I’ve not seen any other reference to it, and am wondering who turned this up — in general if the source is anonymous. I just want to make sure it is what it says it is before I start quoting from it all over the blogosphere.
Here’s McCain’s entire opposition research on Romney. No wonder he didn’t choose him! Fascinating read.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78582788/McCain-2008-Oppo-File
Brilliant, yes, but you are forgetting one other thing that will get Romney’s numbers falling, and that wil be the Convention (buy TINS of popcorm). Between the platform, the number of TeaPartier delegates running wild (am I the only person who remembers the movie THE GREAT RACE and wants to start calling Boehner the “Mayor of Boracho”?), the Paulistas with their own special mischief, and the definite possibility that the convention could turn down the suggested nominee for VP, this will insure a Goldwater/McGovern-level defeat for Romney, as I have been predicting since February. But that’s why I tend to be worried to see the blogosphere focusing too much attention on the Presidential race and not enough on Congress, and particularly the Senate. We’ve got great candidates, the ones everybody knows, like Warren, and also Carmona, Heitkamp, Berkeley, Baldwin. Missouri will be close — Missouri is always close, and Kerrey may be simply too far behind, but we should hold on to every other seat we have, and add quite a few, if we only get the blogosphere working together the way it did on 2006 and 2008 — when we also swept the board. We were responsible for several of the close races, just by building the stories and focusing attention on them.