UPDATED: The AZGOP’s Secret Sting Operation Against Representative Stephanie Stahl Hamilton

UPDATE 4/2/23: Three Members of the Arizona House have indeed filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Stahl Hamilton. You can read this fundamentally dishonest piece of MAGA hypocrisy here.

Readers are probably familiar by now with the narrative around Representative Stahl Hamilton having moved a couple Bibles around in the Captial’s Private Member Lounge, what you might not be aware of is the GOP leadership’s plotting and secrecy around the effort to catch the person moving said Bibles. We’ll discuss more about that, but, first, I want to present Rep. Stahl Hamilton’s spontaneous apology and the AZFamily story:

Advertisement

I spoke with Rep. Stahl Hamilton regarding this issue and came away from our conversation with the impression that the reasons for her behavior were not at all frivolous or mischievous, but a result of offense to some of her most deeply held religious convictions as a Christian and an ordained pastor.

Specifically, she was offended by the prominent and constant display of Holy Scripture in what should be a wholly secular – or at the very least nonsectarian – space, and the implied endorsement and elevation of Christianity above other faiths in a place that should remain neutral and impartial as to one’s faith. Some in the media are at least beginning to question the propriety of that.

She was also deeply offended and frustrated by the constant misuse of the Christian faith and the Bible by some in the majority to justify their vile bigotry and hatred in sponsoring some of the legislation passed by the majority this session targeting our LGBTQIA+ communities, and especially our most vulnerable and misunderstood population of trans children. I believe that Representative Stahl Hamilton acted out of her own deeply held Christian faith that the Gospel of Jesus is centered on love and tolerance, not hate, exclusion, and bigotry.

I strongly suspect that the AZGOP will seek an ethics inquiry into this incident, and when and if that happens, it will be a persecution the Representative, not for any ethical breach – she did nothing unethical nor illegal, nor even irreligious – but a religiously motivated persecution for her liberal and loving interpretation of the Gospel that prompted her small act of rebellion.

Let’s now consider exactly how we got to the point where Rep. Stahl Hamiliton was ‘caught in the act’.

Interesting, is it not, that the Representative and all of her caucus mates were utterly unaware that anyone was filming the Private Lounge? Why did the GOP leadership secretly install a camera in the Private Lounge without informing the whole body? Instead of a simple email from leadership asking whoever might be moving the Bibles in the Private Lounge to knock it off, GOP leadership instead undertook a secret sting operation, including secretly placing video surveillance, to catch the culprit on video. And then instead of handling the issue internally, they leaked that footage to a sympathetic news outlet in order to spring a trap and create a scandal. That seems like pretty ethically suspect behavior to me, actually.

The camera placed in the lounge was not part of the normal surveillance video network run by capital security and the Sergeant at Arms. It was a one-off camera that ran for up to a month in an effort to catch the ‘culprit’ and then leaked to embarrass that person. Where is all that video (potentially hundreds of hours worth) now? Is the footage a public record? Has it been destroyed? Those answers are currently unknown. I understand that the footage has been requested by the Capital Times, but has not yet been produced.

There was a reasonable expectation of privacy in the Private Lounge. Members, staff, and lobbyists met there regularly to discuss confidential business and strategy, yet the leadership secretly – with no notice to the minority – placed a recording device there. Did the video footage include sound? If it did, that may be a crime under Arizona law. And surely the majority leadership would be aware of THAT fact – and thus would never admit it and would possibly destroy the evidence if they had – which strongly argues for an independent investigation of the possibility of a criminal violation by GOP leadership. The potential exists that the majority was secretly recording the conversations of the minority for as much as a month in order to pursue their little sting operation. Did the majority leadership secretly record confidential and candid conversations in which the parties recorded thought they had a reasonable expectation of privacy? That is potentially a massive violation of norms and trust at the Capital in service to a bit of petty embarrassment to someone simply moving a few Bibles around, not to mention a potentially criminal act.

That is the real story here: the violation of minority Members’ reasonable expectation of privacy, and potentially state law, in service to a petty political sting operation.

Members and staff confirm that there was no email inquiry from leadership on the matter, and there was no notice that video surveillance had commenced in the Private Lounge where there was none in the past and a reasonable expectation of privacy existed. How much of the footage was released to AZFamily/Channel3? Was Sargeant-at-Arms Chuck Fitzgerald aware of the sting? I have made an inquiry, but have not gotten a response from him or his office. Did he cooperate in placing the camera secretly? Does he have possession of the secret surveillance video, or possibly audio?

Many of these vital questions that go to the heart of the violation of trust and comity at the Capital remain unasked by the media, who are instead treating this story as a minor and quirky scandal around the religiously-motivated peccadilloes of one Democratic Representative. But this is a much wider story of the violation of privacy and trust within the institution, a possible violation of state laws regarding the secret recording of others, the possible mishandling and concealment of what almost surely are either public records or the evidence of a crime, and the petty and vengeful behavior by the majority toward the minority at the Capital.

Advertisement

Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 thoughts on “UPDATED: The AZGOP’s Secret Sting Operation Against Representative Stephanie Stahl Hamilton”

  1. Stahl-Hamilton committed multiple counts of theft. Arizona Revised Statutes 13-1802 defines theft as without lawful authority, controlling the property of another with intent to deprive the other of such property. That is what she did and all your spin does not make it any different.

    A reasonable person would have gone to the Speaker and asked for other religious books to be added to the collection. And if she thinks there is a wall of separation then why does she take part in religious prayers at the start of each floor session.

    However, I suspect she can get off, if she pleads temporary insanity because what she did was crazy.

    • Then try to prosecute her for theft. Go on. Call the police, file a complaint. I dare you. You will quickly find yourself laughed out of any court. I’ve prosecuted theft cases; you clearly have not. What she did was barely a prank, let alone a crime.

      As to reasonableness, any reasonable person would have just sent an email to the members asking to stop moving the Bibles, but, of course, your caucus decided on an elaborate and possibly illegal sting instead.

      • I do not expect her to be at arrested for that and I believe that that would be an overreaction by the police. Sometimes people do stupid things and the police need to just look the other way. But as a prosecutor, do you deny that she has technically committed theft? It seems very clear that she did.

        However, as to what her fate will be if there is an ethics complaint in the House, that’s another story. Remember, the last two expulsions in the House were for non‐criminal actions and this one is criminal. How ironic that Stahl-Hamilton made the last complaint .

        • Now hang on there, John Government Checks Kavanagh, you guys have Bibles at work?

          Can you look up Matthew 25:40 and read it aloud to the rest of the class?

          Speaking of Ol’ Matt 25, you know who welcomes immigrants and refugees?

          RaicesTexasDotOrg!

          Raices provides free or low cost legal help to immigrants just like the ones Jesus speaks about many times in the Book of Matthew!

          Hooray!

          Donating in Honor of Arizona Rep Who Clearly Hasn’t Read the Bible John Government Checks Kavanagh is a fun way to say, hey, John Government Checks Kavanagh, we see you.

          We see who you really are.

        • Yes, I deny she committed theft. Her actions clearly lack required intent: “Controls property of another with the intent to deprive the other person of such property” She didn’t even remove those Bibles from the room. No ethical prosecutor would indict on these facts, though a zealous and ignorant cop might cite her (as per your own apt example…). There is the further issue that it is not clear proof as to who actually DOES own said Bibles. As far as I’m aware, the Bibles involved have been in the Member’s Lounge for years. In a prosecution, one would have to prove WHO owns the Bibles, or at least that it is clear that ANOTHER owned them (I don’t think there was any clear indication of ownership, but I could just lack info on this point), and there is no clear answer to that question evident here. So, no, she did not ‘technically’ – nor any other sense – commit the crime of theft under AZ law.

          • Once again, I am not calling for her to be arrested and prosecuted criminally. I will grant you that the Bible she put in the refrigerator was not one where she was trying to deprive people of its use. However, hiding them under the cushions clearly was depriving people of their use. The ownership issue is easily disposed of by noting that she wasn’t the owner, so someone else clearly was.

            The fact that she says her intent was to engage in protest does not negate the fact that to accomplish that she intentionally hid them and deprive others of their use. Only a Soros prosecutor would disagree.

      • By the way, this was not a sting operation. Sting operations involve the use of deception. This was just somebody doing wrong court on camera.

  2. I think it would be a good idea to place a Koran and several other religious books in the lounge.

Comments are closed.