The Krazy Kraken Lady Krumbles: ‘No Reasonable Person Would Conclude’ I Was Truthful

The Krazy Kraken Lady, Sidney Powell, the pro-Trump lawyer who spread baseless claims of election fraud, i.e., Trump’s Big Lie, moved Monday to dismiss Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against her. Sidney Powell moves to dismiss Dominion lawsuit:

Powell argues in her motion that “no reasonable person” would conclude that her accusations of Dominion’s election-rigging scheme “were truly statements of fact.”

Advertisement

In other words, the Tucker Carlson Defense. Now don’t all of you Trump/QAnon cult members, and the reckless and irresponsible conservative media entertainment complex (Fox, OANN, Newsmax, Breitbart, etc.) who gave this unprofessional lawyer fraud a platform in which to spread Trump’s Big Lie were duped because you are not “a reasonable person” who can exercise even a modicum of “common sense.”

Now don’t you all just feel stupid and used? Idiots.

https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1374174978015383556

https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1374167388342652929

You believed me when I accused you of election fraud? LOL https://t.co/RuUU6RR79f

— Rick Hasen (@rickhasen) March 22, 2021

This is an admission by a party opponent that will be used against the Krazy Kraken Lady (and the other unprofessional lawyers in her law office) facing bar discipline proceedings in several states.

With just a few small tweaks, Sidney Powell's motion to dismiss could easily be turned into a disbarment decision. https://t.co/WLPDVCXpcg

— Ari Cohn (@AriCohn) March 22, 2021

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3 – Candor Toward the Tribunal, provides:

(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:

(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;

(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or

(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.

(b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.

(c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6.

(d) In an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.

Over 4,000 lawyers have signed an open letter calling on “bar disciplinary authorities” to investigate Powell’s behavior.

Disbar Sidney Powell and every other lawyer on Trump’s “elite strike force team” of corrupt, unprofessional attorneys for lack of candor towards the tribunal, i.e., knowingly making false statements of fact to the court (lying).