Improving student achievement: comprehensive services

by David Safier

Education Week (subscription only) has an article about the Say Yes to Education initiative in New York state. The way it's being implemented in Syracuse, NY, goes beyond tutoring and guaranteed college tuition to offer a wide array of services and programs designed to alleviate many of the hurdles poverty puts in front of children. Before looking at the program, let's look at some results since the program began in 2008.

Since the initiative began in the 2008-09 school year, the 9th grade dropout rate has fallen by nearly half, to 281 students; high school graduation rates have risen 10 percent, to 55 percent in 2011; and college certification and degree earning grew by a third, from 451 students to 579 in 2012.

Juvenile crime rates have fallen as well, from 580 arrests per year to 398. None of these results are spectacular — these kids won't enter college and adulthood with the same skills set as kids from higher income areas — but the results are more significant than what you see with most programs. Of course, it's not cheap. But then again, the Bill Gates Foundation spent more than $150 million to get Common Core up and running, with the idea that if we tell kids we want them to learn more, they will. Gates can see problems like malaria in third world countries, but the successful American businessman doesn't want to admit our economic system, which fits him like a pair of $10,000 leather gloves, grinds others down and dumps innocent children into a nearly inescapable cycle of poverty. That money could be far better spent by putting kids into the mental and physical condition they need to succeed in school. Hell, with the Gates Foundation's enormous endowment, it doesn't have to choose. It could fund both programs without breaking a sweat.

The Arizona Daily Star’s suspect pension analysis

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

I thought the The Brodesky/O'Dell tag team (AKA, the B&O Journalistic Railroad) had left the Arizona Daily Star for greener pastures? Rob O'Dell's classic "fun with facts and figures" that I made up style of reporting shows up in the Star this morning under the byline of Darren DaRonco. City pension plan could cost taxpayers more.

Some questions about this "Star analysis": Who exactly conducted this analysis? Just labeling it a "Star anlalysis" tells me nothing about the capabilities of the individual(s) who conducted the analysis. If it is Star employees, I am confident that they do not possess the background and experience in economics and pension fund management to know what the hell they are talking about.

And why is the "Star analysis" not linked online so that independent experts may peer review your economic analysis? I know some experts who would be happy to review it, as would I.

The article itself concedes that the "Star analysis" is flawed:

Dana Woolfrey, of Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co.,
wrote in an email that while the Star’s projections aren’t
“unreasonable,” there are variances between the city’s numbers and those
the Star used. She described the Star figures, which were taken
directly from city financial reports, as more conservative as they
relate to employee contributions versus city contributions in future
years.

She also said the Star’s projections fail to sufficiently
account for savings the city would experience by extending the average
time employees would pay into the system by five years.

She wasn’t sure a person could conclude the city would make up the difference.

Hawaii: Freeloaders’ Paradise or Wage Earner’s Hell? You Be The Judge

Posted by Bob Lord

This is the third in a series of posts on the recently released Cato Institute Study, The Work Versus Welfare Trade-off: 2013. My apologies if I'm overdoing it here, but I think the Cato Instituted study goes to the heart of what conservative political strategy is all about: Rank intellectual dishonesty used to stoke anger and cause the masses to turn on themselves. In the emerging version of that strategy, conservatives are demonizing the poor as a means of distracting Americans from our ever-worsening inequality.

In the Cato study, the author, Michael Tanner, depicts Hawaii as the freeloaders' paradise. In Hawaii, Tanner claims, a "prototype" family receives $49,175 in welfare benefits annually, an amount that equates to a pre-tax income of $60,590. In previous posts here and here, I've discussed the rank intellectual dishonesty in Tanner's analysis.  

The Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice has a report on The State of Poverty in Hawaii. Here are some of the data that report uses to describe how life is for those happy freeloaders in Hawaii:

We built that: thank the labor movement

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

The first Labor Day holiday was celebrated on Tuesday, September 5, 1882, in New York City, in accordance with the plans of the Central Labor Union. The Central Labor Union held its second Labor Day holiday just a year later, on September 5, 1883.

Labor movement
Credit: The Other 98%

In 1884 the first Monday in September was selected as the holiday, as originally proposed, and the Central Labor Union urged similar organizations in other cities to follow the example of New York and celebrate a "workingmen's holiday" on that date. The idea spread with the growth of labor organizations, and in 1885 Labor Day was celebrated in many industrial centers of the country.

The first governmental recognition came through municipal ordinances
passed during 1885 and 1886. From these, a movement developed to secure
state legislation. The first state bill was introduced into the New York
legislature, but the first to become law was passed by Oregon on
February 21, 1887. During the year four more states — Colorado,
Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York — created the Labor Day holiday
by legislative enactment. By the end of the decade Connecticut,
Nebraska, and Pennsylvania had followed suit. By 1894, 23 other states
had adopted the holiday in honor of workers, and on June 28 of that
year, Congress passed an act making the first Monday in September of
each year a legal holiday in the District of Columbia and the
territories.