Rick Renzi: From the US House to the Big House

By Craig McDermott, cross-posted from Random Musings

 

It was a long and winding road, but the destination is in sight now…

From the Phoenix New Times, written by Ray Stern –

Former Arizona U.S. Congressman Rick Renzi was sentenced today to three
years in prison following his June conviction on fraud and corruption
charges.

The sentence was a long time coming in this classic case of
congressional corruption, but Renzi, a Republican, will finally be doing
some hard time. New Times was the first to expose Renzi's disgusting dealings in a 2006 article that preceded his 2008 indictment.


Arizona U.S. District Judge David C. Bury sentenced Renzi in a Tucson
courtroom Monday, October 28. Renzi's buddy, real-estate investor James
Sandlin, also found out today he'll be serving 18 months in the Big
House himself.

While there may be a few
political luminaries in Arizona who are as deserving of prison as Renzi,
I can't think of any who are *more* deserving.

Rick Renzi sentenced to three years for corruption

Posted by AzBlueMeanie: The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they turn. Former Arizona U.S. Rep. Renzi gets 3-year prison term: Former U.S. Rep. Rick Renzi, convicted in June on 17 counts of extortion, racketeering and other federal charges, was sentenced to three years in prison this morning at the U.S. District Court in Tucson. … Read more

Oh, SNAP! Food stamp cuts go into effect November 1

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

I would encourage you to give generously to your community food banks out of the spirit of the holidays this season, or out of empathy and human compassion for your fellow man, because people are going to need it.

Brad Plumer explains at Wonkblog, Food stamps will get cut by $5 billion this week — and more cuts could follow:

The U.S. food-stamp program is set to shrink in the months ahead. The only real question is by how much.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) currently costs
about $80 billion per year and provides food aid to 14 percent of all
U.S. households — some 47 million people. Those numbers swelled dramatically during the recession.

But the food-stamp program is now set to downsize in the weeks ahead.
There's a big automatic cut scheduled for Nov. 1, as a temporary boost
from the 2009 stimulus bill expires.
That change will trim about $5
billion from federal food-stamp spending over the coming year.

And that's not all: The number of Americans on food stamps could drop
even further in the months ahead, as Congress and various states
contemplate further changes to the program. Here's a rundown:

1) The end of the stimulus boost. First up is a big
automatic cut to SNAP scheduled for Nov. 1. This is happening because
the food-stamp program was temporarily expanded in 2009 as part of the
Recovery Act. That bill spent $45.2 billion to increase monthly benefit
levels to around $133, on average.

That bump will end on Friday, and benefits will shrink by around 5
percent on average.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has a short report calculating what this will mean for individual households:

10-24-13fa-f1-infocus

So, for instance: The maximum monthly benefit for a family of four will
drop from $668 per month down to $632. The maximum monthly benefit for
an individual will drop from $200 per month to $189. ("The cut is
equivalent to about 16 meals a month for a family of three
based on the
cost of the U.S. Agriculture Department’s 'Thrifty Food Plan,' notes
CBPP).

Federal Court blocks Texas abortion law that Wendy Davis tried to stop

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas today issued an opinion striking down two key parts of an abortion restriction that Texas passed earlier this year. Sarah Kliff writes at Wonkblog, Wendy Davis couldn’t stop a Texas abortion law. But a federal court just did.

The decision halts two key provisions of House Bill 2: A requirement
that abortion providers have admitting privileges at a local hospital
and another barring medical abortions.

"The admitting privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a
rational relationship to the legitimate right of the State in preserving
and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a
substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a
nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her," U.S. District Judge
Lee Yeakel wrote in the opinion.

On the medical abortion ban, he wrote, "Although the medication
abortion provisions do not generally place an undue burden on a woman
seeking an abortion, they do if they ban a medication abortion where a
physician determines, in appropriate medical judgment, such a procedure
is necessary for the preservation of the life or health of the mother."

This is a big deal for the 12 Texas abortion providers that filed
suit against the restrictions, which were set to take effect on Oct. 29.

Two AZ Dems leave Democrats for [Conservative] Education Reform

by David Safier Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) is basically a front group for the conservative "education reform" movement — i.e. privatization and corporate takeover of education. For more information, here's a detailed post I wrote about the group and its direct as well as indirect connections to conservative education groups. DFER set up an … Read more