Featured Stories
Dear Democratic legislators: I’ll be happy to complain about anything you want
February 19, 2012
by David Safier Apparently, writing a bill is easier than writing an email reply. If someone complains about something, write a bill to address the complaint. Problem solved. According to Lori Klein, anyway. Klein said complaints led her to write her "partisan doctrine" bill. Sen. Lori Klein, R-Anthem, told Capitol Media Services that she has
Professor Newt doesn’t get oil economics
February 19, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
I have Joe Scarborough to thank for this quote: "Newt Gingrich thinks he is the smartest guy in the room. If Newt Gingrich is the smartest guy in the room, you're in the wrong room." Nailed it!
The big thinker of big ideas, the disgraced former House Speaker and preeminent housing historian, had this to say about U.S. energy policy:
"There is no reason not to believe that we couldn't stabilize with American production by drowning demand in supply the old-fashioned, free market way," he explained. "There's not reason we couldn't have a stable price around $2 or $2.50 [per gallon]."
Well, yes there is "professor." FAUX News Sunday host Chris Wallace tried to explain it to him. Gingrich: 'You Can't Put a Gun Rack on a Volt':
In an interview on Sunday, Fox News host Chris noted that if Gingrich attempted to increase oil production in the U.S., OPEC would decrease production to keep international energy prices high.
"You can't guarantee $2.50 a gallon," Wallace explained.
"You can't guarantee anything," Gingrich agreed. "But you can guarantee that under the Obama plan, there's going to be less American production, higher prices."
Less American production? Does the "professor" not keep up with his homework assignments? CNN Money reported, Gasoline: The next big U.S. export – Dec. 5, 2011:
The United States is awash in gasoline. So much so, in fact, that the country is exporting a record amount of it.
The country exported 430,000 more barrels of gasoline a day than it imported in September, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That is about twice the amount at the start of the year, and experts and industry insiders say the trend is here to stay.
The United States began exporting gas in late 2008. For decades prior, starting in 1960, the country used all the gas it produced here plus had to import gas from places in Europe.
But demand for gas has dropped nearly 10% in recent years. It went from a peak of 9.6 million barrels a day in 2007 to 8.8 million barrels today, according to the EIA.
* * *
To be sure, the United States is still importing plenty of oil to make that gasoline — and is still dependent on foreign countries for well over half the crude it uses.
But now the country's massive refining infrastructure is producing more gasoline, diesel and jet fuel than the United States needs, freeing it up to be exported to places like Brazil, Mexico and Chile where demand is still strong.
[Instead of "drowning demand in supply" and driving down the price of gasoline in the U.S., as well as oil company profits, which would not be "the old-fashioned, free market way."]
The Wall Street Journal, which reported on the export trend last week, said the United States is on track this year to be a net exporter of refined products for the first time in 62 years.
"We've got plenty of excess refining capacity," said Jonathan Cogan, a spokesman for EIA. "It's a reminder that this is a global oil market, and it's reflected by the movements of products to where they will get the highest prices."
Did you catch that last part, "Professor"? Oil is traded on an open global market, and oil will move to where producers can get the highest prices for their product. The United State has only about two percent of the world's oil supplies. Is the "professor" proposing that we nationalize U.S. oil production and pass a law requiring all the oil we produce to be used in the U.S. market to stabilize prices? (On the scale of Richard Nixon's wage and price controls?) Even if we produced the very last drop of U.S. oil, it would never even come close to "drowning demand in supply" as the "professor" dreams. This is utter fantasy.
Deconstructing Santorum’s “local control of schools” position
February 19, 2012
by David Safier Santorum has said he wants to get rid of federal funding of public education. And state funding. "Get rid of all the federal money that goes to primary and secondary education. . . . Not just get the federal government out, but let's get the state government out, and let's get it
How does this work for the “homosexuality is a choice” crowd?
February 19, 2012
by David Safier Why would someone like Paul Babeu choose to be gay? Why wouldn't he choose the heterosexual path when it was obvious his sexual orientation could present a roadblock to his conservative political ambitions? It almost makes you thing Babeu's sexual orientation wasn't a choice. Babeu jumped into politics at 17 and was
The Savior of Salt Lake City? Mittens Exaggerates
February 19, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie: Willard "Mittens" Romney made a short but triumphant return to Utah on Saturday for the 10th anniversary celebration of the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics. On the campaign trail, Mittens regularly regails his audience with tales of how he "saved" the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics. Romney to Team 2002: ‘You have
(Update) Terri Proud and ‘tyranny of the minority’
February 19, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Back in the 1990's the Tucson Weekly used to refer to the "old" Town of Marana as "Dogpatch," when it was ruled by Mayor Ora "Mammy Yokum" Harn. Not much has changed.
The Town of Marana is represented by "consultant" Jonathan "Payday" Paton (Li'l Abner Yokum), who has been advising Dogpatch to steal Tucson's sewage treatment plant and thereby steal its reclaimed water, and no doubt he has advised Rep. Terri Proud (Daisy Mae Yokum) in her nefarious designs to give Tuscon's California refugee retiree bedroom communities — who tend to vote Tea-Publican — a veto power over that liberal blue island of the City of Tucson for Pima County bond projects.
The Yokums thought that neighboring retiree bedroom communities to Tucson would be supportive of the plot by Dogpatch. It turns out, not so much. The Arizona Daily Star reports, Bond-veto bill draws town, city opposition:
Marana is the only jurisdiction that supports the measure.
The mayors of Tucson and South Tucson wrote letters opposing the bill. The Pima County Board of Supervisors is set to approve a resolution opposing it. And the mayors of Sahuarita and Oro Valley have written letters criticizing the bill.
The proposed law – which would apply only to Pima County – would establish a Regional Bond Accountability Committee with one representative from the county and one representative from each city and town.
Ah yes, a replay of our Tea-Publican legislature's tyranny against the Charter City of Tucson in which it subjugated Tucson's residents by seizing control of its Rio Nuevo Board and gave control of Downtown Tucson redevelopment to state of Maricopa politicians to appoint their lackeys to the Board, including Jonathan "Payday" Paton (Li'l Abner Yokum). So far the Tea-Publican legislature's Rio Nuevo Board has only been a cash cow for its favored law firms, incurring millions of dollars in litigation costs, but not producing any of the promised development.
Under Daisy Mae Yokum's bill, "Pima County would not be able to issue or sell general obligation bonds for things like roads, parks, libraries or government buildings without a majority vote from that committee."
Paul Babeu, meet Frank Antenori
February 18, 2012
by David Safier According to Paul Babeu's "Meet Paul" page on his Paul for Congress website (it's sheriffpaul.com, by the way): Army Major and Iraq War Veteran Sheriff Babeu served for over 20 years in the Army National Guard, entering as a Private/E-2 and retiring with the rank of Major. During his tenure he served
The dual origins of the “No Partisan Instruction” bill
February 18, 2012
by David Safier
A big hat tip to Debbie Reese who writes on the American Indians in Children's Literature blog out of New Mexico and has been a contributor to the discussion about the MAS controversy.
Reese pointed me to the first signs of the "No Partisan Instruction" bill Lori Klein is sponsoring. Its first mention, so far as I know, was in the January, 2012, newsletter from TU4SD (Tucsonans United for Sound Districts) run by Lori Hunnicutt, a serious hater of MAS.
"TU4SD has proposed the following piece of legislation. It is modeled on ARS 15-535 (Sectarian instruction prohibited)"
This is 15-535 in its entirety:
15-535. Sectarian instruction prohibited
A teacher who uses sectarian or denominational books or teaches any sectarian doctrine or conducts any religious exercises in school is guilty of unprofessional conduct and his certificate shall be revoked.
The first line of the TU4SD version is almost identical:
"A teacher who uses partisan books and/or partisan materials or teaches any partisan doctrine or conducts any partisan exercises in school is guilty of unprofessional conduct and his certificate shall be revoked."
Interesting. ARS 15-535 is a "separation of church and state" measure. Are Hunnicutt and Klein suggesting separation of partisanship and state?
You can read the page from the TU4SD newsletter below the fold.




