Abortion-inducing drug case may be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

The Oklahoma Supreme Court set the stage Tuesday for the U.S. Supreme Court to rule this term on an abortion dispute over whether states may restrict doctors from prescribing the two drugs that are commonly used by women who seek an abortion in the first weeks of their pregnancy. Stage set for Supreme Court to rule on abortion<-inducing drugs:

The Oklahoma case could be the first test of whether the court’s
conservative majority will uphold the new state laws that seek to
strictly regulate legal abortions.

The legislatures in Oklahoma, Texas and several other states have adopted laws that require doctors to follow the Food and Drug Administration’s protocols for the use of “any abortion-inducing drug.” The laws forbid doctors to prescribe medications for “off-label use.”

Sponsors of the laws said
they wanted to protect the health of women. But medical experts and
supporters of abortion rights said the law would effectively ban
medication abortions because the FDA protocol is outdated and conflicts
with current medical practice.

Only one drug — mifepristone or RU-486 — was approved by the FDA in
2000 for inducing early abortions. In the last decade, however,
physicians have regularly prescribed a second drug — misoprostol — to
complete such abortions through nine weeks of a pregnancy. They also
have prescribed RU-486 in much lower dosages.

When the doctors sued to challenge the state law, the Oklahoma
Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional last year in a three-paragraph
opinion. The state’s attorney general appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court
and argued the state judges had invalidated a reasonable law designed
to regulate the safe practice of medicine.

In June, the [Supreme Court] took an unusual step. They tentatively
agreed to take up the Oklahoma case, but first asked the Oklahoma court
to clarify whether the 2011 state law “prohibits … the use of
misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone.”

In Tuesday’s opinion, the Oklahoma court said the state law, as
written, does indeed prohibit the use of the second drug. It
“effectively bans all medication abortions,” the state court declared.
The judges explained that mifepristone was an abortion-inducing drug,
and noted the FDA had not approved its use for that purpose.

The judges also noted that a third drug — methotrexate
— is commonly used to terminate early ectopic pregnancies. But because
the FDA has not formally approved its use for that purpose, it may not
be prescribed by doctors in Oklahoma, the judges said.

Nancy Northup, president of Center for Reproductive Rights, praised
the Oklahoma court’s decision. It “strongly reaffirms that this
blatantly unconstitutional law was designed to not only rob women of the
safe, legal and effective option of medication to end a pregnancy at
its earliest stages, but also threaten the health, lives and future
fertility of women suffering ectopic pregnancies.”

Now that the Oklahoma court has clarified the state law, the justices
will decide whether to grant a full review
. Lawyers noted that a
similar Ohio law was upheld by a federal appeals court.

The whole point of Tea-Publican controlled state legislatures passing blatantly unconstitutional laws restricting abortions, in defiance of U.S. Supreme Court precedents, is to get one or more of these cases in front of the conservative activist Roberts Court in the belief that this conservative activist Court will reverse Roe v. Wade and the subsequent series of precedents. This may be more wishful thinking and cockeyed optimism than any indication from the Roberts Court that it is willing to consider reversal of landmark precedents on abortion.

Comments are closed.