by David Safier
I would like to understand this better. Napolitano and Democrats proposed borrowing against future tobacco funds and lottery revenues to balance the budget. Republicans said that's mortgaging our future, making our children pay, and so on. (Somehow, drastic cuts in education don't fit the "making our children pay" line of reasoning for them.)
But now they want to sell off state property to balance the budget.
My understanding of "sale and leaseback" is that the state would eventually own the property once again after it paid back the loan, or the sale price with interest, or whatever. How that's different in its long term outcome from borrowing against tobacco and lottery money is beyond me. Basically, isn't the state simply using its assets as collateral for a loan?
I think this next paragraph indicates where the idea is heading in the Republican heads that are proposing it: privatization.
Sell prisons to private companies, who will run them. I know we're doing it already. And I know prisoners are a growth industry so long as we keep putting people away at numbers that astound the rest of the world. I guess it creates prison jobs and keeps the prisoners off the unemployment rolls. That's a good thing during a recession, right?
If you've visited any of our great national parks since they were turned over to private companies to run, you know how much we've lost in the process — and I'm not talking about money. I'm talking about the quality of the service and amenities.
Privatization. I think our state government is the Bush administration, circa 2001. Maybe Arizona should attack Mexico. I bet we'd be greeted as liberators.