Arizona is failing to maintain its roads and bridges in safe repair because of Tea-Publican opposition to taxes to pay for it

The source of all of Arizona’s ills, the religious devotion to the “no new taxes ever, for any reason” dogma of the modern day Tea-Publican Party, is not just failing public education, it is also failing the basic government function of maintaining roads and bridges in safe repair.

Nearly 1,000 bridges in Arizona are labeled as problematic by the Federal Highway Administration. I-10 collapse puts spotlight on Arizona bridge safety:

There are 8,035 highway bridges in Arizona in the 2014 National Bridge Inventory Database, compiled by the federal government. Of those, 256 are considered structurally deficient and 684 are functionally obsolete.

That means almost 12 percent of Arizona’s bridges are labeled problematic by the feds.

Howard Fischer reports today, Audit: Taxes won’t cover long-term needs for roads, bridges:

HighwayArizona will collect less than a third of the money it needs in transportation taxes to meet the anticipated needs by 2035, including keeping the state’s roads and bridges repaired, a new state report shows.

The Arizona Department of Transportation will need about $88.9 billion in its 25-year plan to ensure “minimum acceptable conditions” for the state highway system, the Auditor General’s Office says. But at the current rate taxes are being collected, the agency will have just $26.2 billion over the same period.

State lawmakers must form a task force to find ways to bridge the gap, the study says. And it proposes various options ranging from higher gasoline taxes to finding new ways to raise additional dollars.

Gov. Doug Ducey has pronounced such ideas dead on arrival if they reach his desk.

* * *

That does not bode well for a proposal by Sen. Bob Worsley, R-Mesa, to replace the gasoline tax with a sales tax.

Worsley, who chairs the Senate Transportation Committee, noted the gas tax has been 18 cents a gallon since 1991 when fuel was $1.30 a gallon. A sales tax — Worsley calls it a use tax because it’s paid by people who use the roads — would rise with the price of fuel.

But the governor has said ‘no new taxes’ and so we’ve got to figure out what the right answer is that’s something he can support,” the senator said.

The audit says there’s no crisis — yet. ADOT reports the percentage of pavement in good condition has declined from more than 70 percent in 2005 to less than 63 percent in 2014, the most recent figures available. It’s a trend the agency expects to continue if there are no additional revenues.

It also says ADOT needs to spend $260 million a year just to maintain the roads in current conditions “but is unable to do so because of competing construction needs and priorities.”

The audit also says the lack of maintenance hits Arizonans directly in the pocket: A study by the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that driving on roads in need of repair costs Arizona motorists an estimated $1.5 billion a year — $318 per motorist — in extra vehicle repairs and operating costs.

The problem is heavy reliance on a flat per-gallon fuel tax, according to the report.

“As a result, the purchasing power of Arizona fuel tax revenues also has declined,” the audit states.

Looking at the issue another way, if tax had been indexed to inflation in 1992, the state would have brought in another $4.3 billion through 2014. Instead, Arizona is collecting about $650 million in state gasoline taxes a year, less than it did in 2007.

But it’s not just the flat tax.

On one hand, there are more vehicles on the road.

Consider: In 1998 there were just over 3 million non-commercial motorized vehicles on Arizona highways. The most recent number is approaching 4.6 million.

But cars and trucks also are more fuel efficient. And that doesn’t take into account the increased popularity of alternate fuel vehicles, which get much better mileage, and in some cases, don’t need gasoline at all.

At the same time, Arizonans are driving fewer miles each year now than they did at the peak in 2007.

Lawmakers could increase the gasoline tax. But each penny hike raises only about $36 million a year, meaning the levy would have to go up sharply to fund all the needs.

Another possibility is replacing the gasoline tax with a fee based on miles traveled.

That would be immune to the revenue losses that are likely to continue to occur as fuel efficiency improves. It also has the benefit of hitting the owners of electric and hybrid vehicles.

“However, there are concerns about privacy because of the need for tracking equipment,” the audit says, leaving aside the cost of ensuring that motorists are paying what they owe.

There is a loophole in Ducey’s vow to never hike taxes. Scarpinato said the governor could be convinced to boost the vehicle license fee, another source of dollars for ADOT, insisting that’s not a “tax.” [Yes, it is.]

Ducey made such a proposal for the current budget, proposing to nearly double that to raise an additional $30 million. That, however, proved to be a non-starter in the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Ducey’s opposition aside, Worsley said there’s another political hurdle. He said most of the voters live in Maricopa County where freeway conditions are good, at least in part because of locally raised sales taxes.

It’s also because the state legislature steals highway funds from the other 14 counties to “balance” the state budget, but Maricopa County gets taken care of at the expense of the other 14 counties because that is where more than 60% of the state’s population lives. The disparity is obvious to anyone who drives extensively in Arizona. Because Maricopans are taken care of —

“They don’t see the need,” Worsley said. He said voters need to be convinced there are legitimate needs, such as finishing the widening of Interstate 10 south of Phoenix to three lanes and making a better connection between the new Mariposa port of entry in Nogales to Interstate 19.

Dude, how about just restoring the highway funds that the legislature has stolen from the counties just so they can do basic street and bridge maintenance and repairs? Freeways are a federal government concern.

Oh that’s right. Tea-Publicans in Congress are holding the federal highway bill hostage to their government shutdown plan as well. What, You Thought Congress Would Actually Pass a Transportation Bill? Federal highway funding is schedule to run out Oct. 29, so Sen. Whitehouse and other lawmakers are trying to rally support for the Senate’s bill before the deadline. Whitehouse urges passage of highway bill

3 thoughts on “Arizona is failing to maintain its roads and bridges in safe repair because of Tea-Publican opposition to taxes to pay for it”

  1. First of all, that major bridge collapse you spoke of occurred in California, the state with which you are so enamored. And speaking of your beloved California, while they are doing such a magnificent job funding education (at least according to you) they have let their roads, bridges and other transportation infrastructure go to hell. You only have to take a drive into California to appreciate how good Arizona is doing.

    Your 12% is a bit misleading. It is a worst case scenario, and that isn’t compared to other states. I mention that because you always like to compare Arizona to other states to show how miserable things are here. You didn’t do that with this story, which speaks volumes.

    We do need to spend more on transportation infrastructure, I agree. I will contact my legislators and encourage action be taken so Arizona continues to have decent infrastructure.

    • The article linked is The Arizona Republic and the study is specifically about bridges in Arizona — it even has an interactive map. Reading comprehension, Troll. You can’t make it something it is not just to engage in your unhinged troll rants. You are wasting everyone’s time, including your own.

      • The article was about Arizona…no kidding?!?!? That is what I talked about. BUT the I-10 bridge collapse they refered to was the bridge collapse in California. Your response indicates you don’t realize that, but I think you must know that because it so obvious.

        Were Democrats running the State you would take this same report and use it as an example of how good things are going under the tutelage of Democrats because 88% of our infrastructure is solid and the other 12% isn’t that bad.

        We DO need to put more money into our infrastructure and raising the tax on gas is the ideal way to do it. I will lobby my legislators to try and make that happen.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: