One of our conservative commenters, whom I nicknamed “Dang” back when I thought he/she might be the same person as our friend Thucky (I was wrong), made what I thought was a particularly apt comment to a recent BlueMeanie post on the May jobs report.
The Meanie reported accurately about the job creation in May (280,000), which was impressive, and the consistency of the jobs recovery, also impressive, if you focus on the number of jobs. The Meanie pointed to a possible weakness in productivity growth, a point to which I’ll return below, and other factors in trying to reconcile the robust job growth with the less than stellar economic growth.
Dang had what on the surface would be an entirely different way of reconciling the job growth with overall economic strength. Here’s Dang’s comment:
No administration’s policies have created more twenty hour per week jobs than the current one.
I don’t agree with Dang’s attribution to this administration’s policies, but put that aside. The comment otherwise is spot-on. A lot of the newly created jobs have been what we insist on describing as “part-time” jobs.
And that’s where I think the Meanie’s chest-thumping about Obama’s job creation and Dang’s harrumphing about supposedly shortened work weeks can be reconciled.
If you’re still interested, follow me after the jump.