Census Report: a ‘trifecta’ of good economic news

If you listen to Tea-Publicans tell the tale, America is a smoldering hellscape of economic ruin and despair on the verge of a zombie apocalypse. This may be true in isolated pockets of the country, mostly in red states controlled by Tea-Publican politicians. Maybe their citizens will finally wake up and realize therein lies their problem before election day.

For the rest of the country, things are looking up. As I posted about yesterday, Consumer Confidence Up in August to Highest Level in a Year:

economy“Consumer confidence improved in August to its highest level in nearly a year, after a marginal decline in July,” said Lynn Franco, director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board. “Consumers’ assessment of both current business and labor market conditions was considerably more favorable than last month. Short-term expectations regarding business and employment conditions, as well as personal income prospects, also improved, suggesting the possibility of a moderate pick-up in growth in the coming months.”

And Americans are feeling the best about the U.S. economy that they have since before the 2008 economic collapse, a CNN/ORC poll released Friday has found. Poll: Economic outlook best in 9 years:

In a reflection of rising optimism, 53% of Americans say economic conditions in the US are good, up from the 45% who felt that way in June. It’s the highest number since September 2007, before the 2008 economic collapse.

The poll also showed that President Barack Obama continues to have majority approval ratings, at 51%. His approval rating has been at or above 50% since February, the longest stretch of his presidency since his first year in office.

The Census Bureau released more good economic news today. Middle class incomes had their fastest growth on record last year:

The incomes of typical Americans rose in 2015 by 5.2 percent, the first significant boost to middle-class pay since the end of the Great Recession and the fastest increase ever recorded by the federal government, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday.

In addition, the poverty rate fell by 1.2 percentage points, the steepest decline since 1968. There were 43.1 million Americans in poverty on the year, 3.5 million fewer than in 2014.

The share of Americans who lack health insurance continued a years-long decline, falling 1.3 percentage points, to 9.1 percent.

The numbers, from the government’s annual report (.pdf) on income, poverty and health insurance, suggest the recovery from recession is finally beginning to lift the fortunes of large swaths of American workers and families. The Obama administration and its allies immediately hailed them in glowing terms.


“This exceeds the strong expectation that I already had,” Jason Furman, chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, said in an interview, in which he called the income report the strongest ever from the Census Bureau. “The news here is the growth rates. I’ve read the last 21 reports, including this one. I have never seen one like this, in terms of, everything you look at is what you’d want to see or better.”

Republicans discounted the improved outlook . . . “Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes!” This is part of the decades-long GOP assault on government institutions (like the FED, the Department of Labor, the IRS,  the Census Bureau, etc.), science and facts in favor of “feelings” generated by the GOPropagandists of the conservative media entertainment complex. Feelings vs. Fact (“Professor” Newt Gingrich explains it to you.)

The numbers appear to run counter to a key narrative in the 2016 presidential campaign, pushed by Republican nominee Donald Trump, that America is in decline and working people’s lives are getting worse. Trump frequently cites median income stagnation, relying on previous Census data, on the campaign trail. His campaign had not released a statement on the new Census report as of midday Tuesday. Doh!

Jared Bernstein analyzes the Census report at the Post, A tightening labor market and Obamacare delivered income growth and health coverage to working families in 2015:

Poverty fell sharply, middle-class incomes rose steeply, and more people had health coverage last year, according to Tuesday’s report on household economic conditions from the Census Bureau — the best evidence to date that the growing economy is finally reaching households that had been left behind.

Poverty rate drops

The official poverty rate fell from 14.8 percent in 2014 to 13.5 percent last year, a decline of 3.5 million people in households whose incomes put them below the poverty threshold for their family type. (The poverty threshold for a single parent with two children was around $19,000 in 2015). This is the largest one-year decline in poverty since 1968.

In 2007, before the Great Recession drove many more families into poverty, the rate was 12.5 percent. Below, I discuss the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), a more inclusive measure that’s more appropriate for historical comparisons. It, too, fell significantly last year, from 15.3 percent to 14.3 percent. As shown below, the decline in poverty was greater for minority populations.

Household income rises

Median household income rose 5.2 percent in real terms, from $53,700 in 2014 to $56,500 in 2015, a gain of $2,800, the first real gain since 2007, and the largest gain on record back to 1967, when these data begin.

This brings the real median household income just slightly below its 2007 peak (the difference is statistically insignificant). For black and Hispanic households, real median income rose 4.1 percent and 6.1 percent, respectively (figure below). Income gains were significantly larger at the middle and bottom of the income scale relative to the top, meaning lower income inequality.

Heath insurance expands

Health coverage continued to increase, as the Affordable Care Act’s coverage measures — the Medicaid expansion and state exchanges — diffuse across the land. Today’s data show that the share without coverage fell last year to 9.1 percent, down from the 2014 uninsured rate of 10.4 percent, meaning 4 million more people got health coverage. Comparisons to earlier years cannot be made due to changes in the survey questions, but show that since the ACA was enacted, the number of the uninsured is down by 20 million and the rate is down from 16 percent to 9 percent.

Such a trifecta — lower poverty, higher middle-class incomes and more people covered by health insurance — is rare in this annual report. In fact, since 1988 (the first year for which census data on health insurance are available), the only other year that brought simultaneous official progress on poverty, median income and health insurance was 1999.

These very positive results were largely driven by two factors: a stronger labor market that finally began to lift the living standards of low- and middle-income working families and the diffusion of health coverage because of the Affordable Care Act. In other words, both the economy and public policy were finally pulling for the middle class and the poor. Given the powerful forces of inequality pushing the other way, the results show the extent to which this one-two punch — full employment and progressive policies — can lift the living standards of working families.

Putting the gains in historical context

The first figure below shows real median household income for all households and by race (the break in the series at the end is because of recent changes in Census Bureau survey methodology). Real middle incomes for households grew in the long recoveries of the 1980s and considerably more so in the full employment 1990s. But since then, they’ve been largely stagnant, falling in the Great Recession and the initially weak expansion that followed. The sharp trend reversals in middle-class incomes are clear in the figure.


The next figure shows official poverty rates, pre-recession and 2014-2015. As noted, while minorities have higher poverty levels than whites, their declines in poverty last year were larger. This is a characteristic outcome of tight labor markets, which disproportionately benefit minorities. (Of course, the opposite is true as well, as downturns are particularly damaging to those with fewer resources to fall back on). Note, for example, that the poverty rates of blacks and Hispanics are back to their pre-recession levels.


A big shortcoming of the official poverty measure is that it fails to include the effect of certain anti-poverty policy measures, such as the cash value of nutritional support and refundable tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit. These policies have been increasingly effective at lifting working families out of poverty (or nearer to the poverty threshold). Fortunately, the Census Bureau publishes a Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) that accounts for these policies. (The SPM also updates the poverty thresholds to be more consistent with basic needs faced by contemporary families).

While the official poverty rate, which, again, fails to reflect many advances in anti-poverty policy, shows little historical progress over time, the more accurate SPM shows that poverty rates are down by almost half since the 1960s (from about 26 percent to about 14 percent), a fact that belies that oft-heard conservative mantra that “we fought a War on Poverty and poverty won.” Neither did poverty “lose;” i.e., it is still much too high, especially considering the long-term damage that economic deprivation wreaks on children. But we will never effectively benchmark the effectiveness of interventions if we depend on metrics that ignore them.

The figure below shows how effective anti-poverty measures were in offsetting the Great Recession, as both automatic stabilizers, such as Unemployment Insurance and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and discretionary spending (as in the Recovery Act) ramped up to meet the need of households hit by the deep downturn (note that such assistance is left out of the official measure). Compared with the increase you see in the official rate (above figure), the SPM went up very little and fell significantly last year.


What changed in 2015 to reverse the negative trends in income and poverty? One factor is the tightening of the job market, which led to growth in jobs and wages, and not just for those at the top of the scale but also for middle- and lower-income households, as well.

Unemployment fell about a point in 2015, to 5.3 percent on average for the year. That’s not yet full employment, but, in tandem with very low inflation — because of falling energy prices, inflation was close to zero last yearit was enough to boost the bargaining clout of working households such that they finally started to see some growth show up in their paychecks.

Labor-market data from other sources show that real hourly pay, for example, of blue-collar manufacturing workers and non-managers in services rose 2 percent in real terms last year, compared with less than 1 percent the year before. Minimum wage increases also helped to boost low wages (and continue to do so; see Table 1 here). Employers added 2.9 million jobs to their payrolls last year, the strongest year for job growth since 1999. This combination of added jobs and rising real wages helped fuel the results in the data released today.

The figure below, using data from Tuesday’s report, shows the real annual median earnings of men and women who work full-time, full-year jobs, i.e., workers who are solidly connected to the labor market. Their pay rose 1.5 percent for men and 2.7 percent for women last year, as the number with jobs grew by 2.4 million. Typically, when we observe labor markets that are both adding jobs and raising pay, it signals an increase in labor demand. Moreover, this increase in reaching lower down into the wage scale suggests that tight labor markets are giving middle-wage workers more of the bargaining clout they need to claim more of the growth they’re helping to produce.

But the other trend that’s clear in this figure is the long-term stagnation of men’s earnings (and remember, these guys work full time, full year). Yes, the median worker got a nice bump last year, but the median man’s earnings haven’t budged much since the 1970s, even though productivity has doubled since then. [The source of Donald Trump supporters.]


Finally, the improvement in health coverage is unquestionably a function of the Affordable Care Act, reflecting both the expansion of Medicaid into 32 states (including the District) and subsidized premiums for the majority in state health care exchanges. The Census Bureau data showed that the share of Americans without coverage fell more than a percentage point last year, from 10.4 percent to 9.1 percent. These data also show improvements in health coverage in every state (and the District) since 2013.

However, because of changes in their survey methods, longer term comparisons are not valid in Census Bureau coverage. But an alternative survey run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that since the enactment of health reform in 2010, “the number of uninsured Americans has fallen by 20 million, according to this survey, with the uninsured rate declining from 16 percent to 9.1 percent.”

It takes the one-two punch of tight labor markets and public policies to push back on inequality.

In the age of economic inequality, gross domestic product growth alone can’t be counted on to lift the living standards of the poor or the middle class. The latest results show that it took until year six of the current expansion, which began in mid-2009 [due to GOP obstruction in Congress and the budget sequester], for growth to reach low- and middle-income families who, according to this annual Census Bureau survey of households, made little progress in recent years. Still, while the indicators in Tuesday’s report are strongly positive along many important lines, poverty remains higher, and middle-class incomes have only recovered to where they were before the bursting housing bubble threw the U.S. economy into deep recession in late 2007.

Climbing out of a hole is unquestionably progress, but we must do better. Ideally, the living standards of families across the income scale should grow with the overall economy, making steady progress along with the expansion, not stagnation, followed by a great year. Also, as I stressed above, unusually low inflation was a very favorable factor in these data. Price growth is already higher than it was last year, and while I expect that positive trends shown above have continued in 2016, I also suspect they’re somewhat dampened.

That said, a great year is a great year, and it has been a long time coming for many of these households.’

In 2015, the combination of a strengthening labor market and public policies targeted at poor and middle-class families proved to be a powerful one-two punch. These two forces helped to offset the wedge of inequality that has long channeled much of the growth in market-based wages and incomes to those at the top of the income scale.

But one year does not a new trend make; neither does it make up for years of stagnation of real median incomes of many working families. If we are to make a lasting difference in the living standards of poor and middle-class families, policymakers must build on the successes seen in this latest report. That means getting to and staying at full employment, expanding health coverage through the Affordable Care Act, and making sure the safety net continues to catch and lift those who lack the resources and opportunities they need to realize their economic potential.

This means electing more Democrats to Congress, and kicking out the post-policy nihilists of the Tea-Publican Party who seek to undermine these successful programs, and who do not believe in public policy or responsible governance.

9 thoughts on “Census Report: a ‘trifecta’ of good economic news”

    • Weird, we challenged you to tell us when you were going to get Arizona caught up with the rest of the country, and rather than answer the question, you accuse everyone else of living in an unchallenged world.

      Your logic is a little brittle, you should really think these things through a bit more.

    • OK smartass, let’s start with the fact that the Bush-Cheney regime crashed the economy with trickle-down economics and casino capitalism on Wall Street. They dug the deepest hole since the Great Depression and nearly blew up the world’s economy and financial system in the process. The Aughts were a lost decade for U.S. economy and workers, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/01/AR2010010101196.html. You own that.

      This was nearly a decade of economic catastrophe that Republican policies left to President Obama to clean up.

      The Democratic Congress elected in 2008 stopped the bleeding and began to reverse the damage, with no help from Republicans who opted to become the “Party of No” to everything that President Obama proposed. Republicans engaged in obstruction and sabotage in Congress (ad they still are). Then came the Tea Party insurrectionists in 2010 with government shutdowns and the GOP budget sequester. They actually wanted to default on the debt, and caused the first downgrade in credit in U.S. history. You own that too.

      The amazing part is that what President Obama and Democrats have managed to get through Congress has led to the economic progress cited in the Census report. We can only imagine how much better off the economy would be today if we could rid ourselves of ignorant Republicans such as yourself who believe in the fantasy of trickle-down economics, which has been entirely disproved and discredited.

      Kick ’em all out!

      • Every other president was given support from congress to get out of a recession. Reagan included, who spent like a drunken sailor.

        Obama, on the other hand, has watched as the GOTeaP fire government workers go in droves. Government is 8% smaller over the last 7 years.

        Because somehow to a conservative mind, it’s a good thing to fire tens of thousands of people to correct a problem with high unemployment.

        It’s funny that Kavanagh, when he can take time away from padding George C. Zoley’s compensation package of over 6 million of taxpayer dollars, claims Obama is causing all the nation’s woes, when his party has been running the show in DC since 2010, and in Arizona since before dirt.

        But no, it’s never anything he or his party are doing, it’s always that black guy in the White House.

  1. I remember before the Great Recession, the real estate industry in Arizona, was bragging how whatever they wanted the Republican legislature delivered to them. And the banking industry, they got all the deregulation they wanted. Both delivered what your Republican friends always wanted, John, massive real estate and banking speculation and temporary profits, unregulated. Until the chickens came home to roost. Yes, it took Obama seven years to clean up the mess you and yours wrought, John, by kowtowing to the real estate and banking lobby.

  2. Wow! It only took Obama seven years to deliver a pay raise for the middle class. Finally hope caused change.

    • Hey John, when do you expect to be able to do for Arizona what Obama did for the nation?

      Obama took 7 years with a racist and treasonous Tea Party controlled congress.

      What’s your excuse?

    • If it wasn’t for your obstructionist saboteur Tea-Publican cohorts in Congress, it would have been sooner. Kick ’em all out!

Comments are closed.