David Sirota’s Plan: Dare These Obstructionist Democratic Divas To Vote No (And End Their Careers)

David Sirota has a plan: stop playing the game of these obstructionist saboteurs, prima donna divas Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, and add more money to the budget reconciliation bill for Arizona and West Virginia, then dare them to vote no against bulked up benefits for the voters of their states. It’s so audacious, it just might work.

David Sirota writes at The Daily Poster, Call Their Bluff Right Now:

Advertisement

As millions of Americans are being cut off from jobless benefits, pulverized by health care costs, bankrupted by the COVID economy, and battered by the intensifying climate apocalypse, the country has spent weeks watching Sen. Joe Manchin issue royal edicts from the deck of his luxury yacht, and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema toggling between spa fundraisersand a European vacation. The Senate apparently has so little to do, it has time this week for a confirmation hearing to deliver disgraced Chicago mayor-turned-Wall-Street-mogul Rahm Emanuel a cushy ambassadorship — an insulting spectacle scheduled on the 7-year anniversary of Emanuel’s police force murdering teenager Laquan McDonald.

The interminable delay of an up-or-down Senate vote on President Joe Biden’s agenda serves no one other than Sinema, Manchin, and their corporate donors who want the bill gutted or killed. Every day Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer stalls a vote on an already-scaled-back $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill, Senate Democrats become more complicit in the betrayal of their party’s campaign promises, the evisceration of the working class, and the destruction of the climate.

They can make a different choice and hold a vote right now.

As Sunrise Movement co-founder Will Lawrence said: “Put the bill on the floor, load it up with extra investment for West Virginia and Arizona, and dare them to vote it down.”

That’s not what Manchin and Sinema want – they and their corporate paymasters love the current slow-walk. As the process drags out, the pair get to keep making ever-changing, mercurial declarations about parts of the legislation they and their donors dislike, and then they get to continue raking in campaign cash from industries that would benefit from hollowing out the bill. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats and the White House keep responding to the jeremiads by promising to whittle down the legislation all in the name of to appease the Wolf of West Virginia and the Arizona Attention Freak.

Note: Politico: Sinema rakes in Pharma and finance cash amid reconciliation negotiations; Common Dreams, New Filing Reveals Sinema Pads Campaign Coffers With More Pharma and Finance Funds; E.J. Momntini, Is Sen. Kyrsten Sinema addicted to Big Pharma’s money?Business Insider, Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema received the legal maximum of donations from several known GOP donors, new FEC filings show. “It’s all about the Benjamins, baby!

And “Silent Sinema” really doesn’t care what you think about it. Kyrsten Sinema Is Unfriending Her Network Into Oblivion.

If this is a grand game of poker, both Manchin and Sinema have so far played their hands masterfully, bluffing a $6 trillion proposal down to $4 trillion, then to $3.5 trillion, then down to $1.9 trillion, and potentially on its way to two bucks and a used Casio wristwatch. Now they are doubling down on their strategies, expecting nobody in power to call and make them show their cards.

Sinema is once again saying she won’t even consider voting for the reconciliation bill unless the Republican-backed, lobbyist-sculpted infrastructure legislation she and Manchin negotiated passes first.

At the same time, word leaked this week that Manchin wants the bill’s major climate provisions watered down or deleted. Then we learned that the West Virginia senator wants to subject the child tax credit to work requirements.

Note: Joe Manchin and his son made their fortune from federal coal subsidies to their coal company. This is corporate welfare, and he wants to begrudge middle-class families their child tax credit? Fuck him.

In line with Sirota’s plan to sweeten the budget reconciliation plan, Zack Colman writes at Politico, To woo Manchin, Dems could OK climate funds for coal and gas plants. Give him a piece of the action instead of threatening his revenue stream. This is what a corrupt politician really wants.

Yes, it is counter-productive from good government policy. Money For Green Energy Creates More Jobs Than Fossil Fuel Investment, New Study Finds; As Manchin Blocks Climate Plan, His State Can’t Hold Back Floods. But if you want all the good things in this bill, you need to grease Manchin’s palm with money.

Considering the existing child tax credit’s success in reducing poverty, Manchin’s latter demand is not even pretending to be a serious policy, it’s quite obviously just a sadistic idea deliberately crafted to inflict harm. It is so cartoonishly mean-spirited and has so much Dr. Evil energy that it suggests Manchin has transformed into a movie villain gleefully engineering a pain-tolerance experiment to see whether the American population is going to tolerate his expensive loafers repeatedly kicking the face of the working class.

As grotesque as they are, the gambits from Sinema and Manchin do at least give us a glimpse of their overall strategy. The pair is not only wagering that House Progressives will ultimately bail on their “no climate, no deal” pledge to hold out, but also that Democratic leaders will capitulate on anything and everything. More specifically, Sinema and Manchin are betting that concern trolling the bill in the press will prompt party leaders to once again hack away at the legislation before the two senators are ever put on the spot to vote yes or no.

And so far, the wager is working. In the name of appeasing the two apostates, the White House is reportedly firing up the legislative blowtorch to further incinerate the climate provisions, even as scientists are begging them to instead stop the incineration of the Earth’s ecosystem.

“We Have Very Little Time”

For his part, Schumer previously — and accurately — went on record suggesting that gutting his party’s promised agenda would be both a political and ecological disaster.

Earlier this year, he promised that Democrats had learned their lesson from the election debacles of the Obama era, and were “not going to make the mistake” of scaling back their ambitions to try to appease conservatives. Then, in August, Schumer sent an letter to every Senate Democrat saying that when it comes to the reconciliation bill, “we have very little time to prevent the most horrendous outcomes for our children and grandchildren,” adding that “I do not believe we have the luxury of failure if we are to provide a good future for ourselves and our children.”

He’s correct, and he could force the issue by simply putting the compromise $3.5 trillion reconciliation package on the floor of the Senate for an up-or-down vote — a call-the-bluff, with-us-or-against-us move that Manchin and Sinema probably do not expect, and do not relish facing. After all, they’ve got a great situation right now. They get to keep sitting at the poker table making gestures and grunts that prompt Democrats to continue folding. If things keep progressing like this, they may be able to bluff their way into gutting the bill and generating a big payout for their donors, without ever having to show their cards.

But if Schumer and Biden and their party actually wants to pass a real reconciliation bill that isn’t gutted (granted, that’s a big “if”), then they should remember that old adage about rigged games: The only winning move is not to play.

One way to stop playing the game Manchin, Sinema, and their corporate sponsors are playing is to schedule a vote on a bill. And to really up the ante, Democratic leaders could add a bunch of programs that will target aid and investment to West Virginia and Arizona.

Holding a vote would make this terrible twosome go on record voting against paid family leave, universal pre-K, free community college, and every other wildly popular and desperately needed initiative in the legislation.

Holding a vote would make Manchin try to explain why he would deny an expansion of dental care to seniors in West Virginia, who are facing a dental health crisis. It would compel him to explain why he takes orders from Exxon lobbyists, and is trying to kill climate initiatives when West Virginia is the most flood-threatened state in America, and only a tiny fraction of its jobs is actually in mining.

Similarly, holding a vote would make Sinema head back to the desert and explain why she is betraying her own explicit prescription drug promises and killing drug pricing legislation for Arizona seniors, and make her explain why she’s voting down climate legislation when the climate crisis could soon make large regions of her state uninhabitable.

Hold the damn vote. Now.

A Calculated Gamble

Polls show the reconciliation bill remains wildly popular, despite corporate media obscuring its details in vapid horse race coverage. Even so, forcing the issue and holding a vote is, admittedly, a bit of a gamble. While there is little historical precedent for a pair of Democrats tanking their own party’s agenda at the legislative finish line, these are unprecedented times. On a final passage vote on a $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill, the two could opt to join Republicans and reject the bill.

But ask yourself: Why would that official rejection be so tragic, compared to where we are now? The answer is, it wouldn’t be.

For some reason, lots of people seem to believe that a bill getting initially voted down means it’s all over, and the bill cannot be quickly tweaked and brought up again — even though that’s happened all the time throughout history. Indeed, some huge bills — Medicare, the TARP program, etc. — have taken a few tries to pass.

If that happened again now — if Manchin and Sinema voted “no” on an initial reconciliation bill — the legislation wouldn’t be in a different place than it is right now. In fact, some form of the bill might actually have a better chance of ultimately passing, because more people would be even more pissed off and willing to mobilize against the duo in response to their obviously reckless behavior.

Note: These obstructionist Democratic divas are saboteurs of the Biden agenda, and are appeasing the enemies of democracy, the Sedition Party which wants to end American democracy for GQP authoritarian tyranny. GOP rallies around Manchin, Sinema:

Republicans are rallying around Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), the centrists who are in a fierce battle with progressives in their party.

Senate Republicans, despite having many policy differences with Manchin and Sinema, are singing their praises, knowing that they will be key to stopping or slowing President Biden’s ambitious agenda.

But both Democrats would be top Republican targets in 2024 if they decide to run for reelection[.]

But there must be a real campaign, not just press releases and tweets. There has to be everything from television ads shaming the targets, to a full White House arm-twisting operation, to public protests. That’s the only way to have any chance to make Manchin, Sinema, and other potential apostates feel extremely uncomfortable.

See, ‘We’re going to make her life unpleasant’: Activists aren’t finished with Kyrsten Sinema:

Grassroots activists and union groups are preparing to launch a flurry of protests against Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz) — who they worry could single-handedly sink President Biden’s agenda.

“We’re committed to birddogging Kyrsten Sinema with her constituents until the very end,” Our Revolution Executive Director Joseph Geevarghese said in an interview. “What we want to show is that her constituents are very serious about wanting policies and activism and we’re going to make her life unpleasant or uncomfortable until that happens.”

If that happened, the wavering senators would be put on the spot, which is a place most professional politicians — even the corrupt narcissists — typically do not want to be.

In an up-or-down vote scenario, Democratic traitors following through on their bluffs and threats would be required to withstand what could be an absolutely withering amount of pressure and shaming. Their permanent legacy will be destroying their party’s presidency, and potentially their party’s long-term viability.

Maybe that doesn’t matter to Manchin and Sinema, because they are sociopaths and because they’re positioned to get paid out for just such a “no” vote when they leave office. But maybe it would matter to them because at least in theory, they are still human beings, and most human beings don’t like to be world-famous pariahs whose ecocidal narcissism will be permanently enshrined in the geologic record.

And again, if the bill can just be brought up again, what is there really to lose?

A Democratic apologist might counter that, all evidence to the contrary, their beloved party leaders are playing some brilliant game of 15-dimensional chess and the reason the bill hasn’t been put to a vote yet is because Manchin and Sinema may get their precious feelings hurt and get mad if they are put on the spot.

Sure, that’s possible — but if this amoral pair is really willing to take down their entire party’s agenda, they’ve already made that lobbyist-directed decision. If that’s what’s going on, compelling them to vote isn’t going to be some sort of trajectory-changing setback — and it at least presents the chance to make them think twice.

It Only Works With A Real Campaign

Of course, there are many “ifs” at play here — the most important being the existence of such a carrot-and-stick pressure campaign. Put simply: Calling their bluff and holding a vote doesn’t work if the White House, the party apparatus, and Washington’s constellation of liberal advocacy groups aren’t all in on a campaign to shame Manchin and Sinema for obstruction, and reward them for support.

So far, Sinema has been hit with a nasty resolution from the Arizona Democratic Party and the threat of a real primary in 2024, and Manchin is now throwing a temper tantrum after Sen. Bernie Sanders published an op-ed in a West Virginia newspaper politely suggesting that he help working people and support the bill. That reaction from Manchin is encouraging – it suggests he could end up completely freaked out if he ever faced real, sustained pressure at home.

But those reprimands have been the exceptions. In general, the Biden administration and much of the professional liberal establishment in Washington have shown no appetite for any kind of intra-party conflict. In fact, Biden’s political machine actually aired ads thanking Sinema for supporting a drug pricing policy she has been helping her pharmaceutical industry donors stymie.

That kind of feeble obsequiousness reflects the modern Democratic Party’s nihilistic culture of conflict avoidance.

Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson are still rightly celebrated for bullying, intimidating, and cajoling conservative Democrats into supporting the New Deal and Medicare.  But today’s Democratic politicians, Democratic voters, and Democratic-aligned media voices have been inculcated to get the vapors and have fainting spells any time one Democrat pressures another Democrat. The 2020 Democratic presidential primary’s ahistorical aversion to any robust conflict proved that, and the legislative debate is so far proving it as well — with potentially horrific consequences for the economy and the environment.

Those consequences are not preordained — at least not yet. There is still time to avert a disaster, but only if the party that controls the lawmaking process is willing to use hardball tactics and have a long-overdue fight with itself — right now.

If it isn’t, Democrats will be admitting they aren’t even willing to sit down at the poker table, ante up and play a real game. They’ll be letting us know that either they are unwilling to muster the courage to deliver for their voters, or they are knowingly and deliberately complicit in the problems their corporate donors are creating.

Well said, and I totally agree. Stop playing these Democratic divas’ game, and put the House passed reconciliation bill to a vote in the Senate. Bury these Democratic divas in negative campaign ads and public protests. To mix sports metaphors, go full court press and play hardball.

Stop taking shit from these bought and paid for Democratic divas. Enough is enough.





Advertisement

Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “David Sirota’s Plan: Dare These Obstructionist Democratic Divas To Vote No (And End Their Careers)”

  1. Don Winslow
    @donwinslow
    EXPLOSIVE NEW VIDEO! #JoeManchinSenatorForSale

    @Sen_JoeManchin
    is blocking Joe Biden’s agenda.

    We found so much vile and provable corruption in Manchin’s life and his families life that we could not fit it all into one video. So this is just Part 1.

    RETWEET THIS EVERYWHERE

    1:59 PM · Oct 18, 2021·Twitter Web App

    https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1450205030393413634

  2. The gutting of BBB is being unveiled.

    https://www.npr.org/2021/10/20/1047609415/white-house-drops-free-community-college-from-its-spending-bill

    White House drops free community college from its spending bill
    October 20, 202111:40 AM ET
    ELISSA NADWORNY

    The Biden administration’s program to make community college tuition-free will not become a reality in this round of the president’s spending priorities, leaving progressive groups disappointed.

    Both progressive and moderate Democrats confirmed to NPR that two free years of community college — a major Biden priority — will likely not make it in a final package of key progressive priorities. Other higher education provisions included in the original bill — like expansion of Pell Grants for low-income students, money for college completion and vocational programs — are still on the table.

    Biden had hinted last week that the free community college program would be omitted from the final bill.

    • I am livid about this. I’m sure that I’m going to be upset about a lot of what is being gutted in BBB, but axing free community college is so shortsighted and so stupid I just can’t find words.

      Tell me again how we are supposed to build a 21st century workforce? And what about who gets opportunities and who doesn’t? Instead, we will demonize China for being good at education and technology and American corporations will bitch and moan that they can’t compete and shouldn’t we just start a war or something to slow them down? What happened to the good old days when they manufactured trinkets and low tech junk for Wal-Mart?

  3. “…they are still human beings, and most human beings don’t like to be world-famous pariahs whose ecocidal narcissism will be permanently enshrined in the geologic record.”

    Based on what they’ve already done, I don’t think either of the two crooks is thinking that far ahead.

    But I agree that Sinema and Manchin should have to vote on the reconciliation bill before it is gutted or killed. There is absolutely nothing to lose, and it’s a power move that they aren’t prepared for.

    Sinema’s agenda appears to be saving the filibuster, keeping drug prices high for the pharmaceutical companies, and blocking tax increases for corporations and the wealthy. I see no evidence that she cares if the “bipartisan” infrastructure bill is legislated or not. It passed the Senate, “supporting” her filibuster argument, and she doesn’t need it to become law.

    Sinema is not a visionary, not even a “conservative” visionary. She’s not trying to accomplish anything as a lawmaker. This is her first time in the majority, she was targeted and easily corrupted. They let her sniff the big corporate money and she liked it. She wants more.

    I can’t imagine her endgame or if she is just making it up as she goes. I think the latter is more likely. And that makes her dangerous and more apt to do things that are really stupid, like setting fire to Biden’s agenda and presidency.

  4. Erica Payne writes at Salon, “No surrender: Progressives must not compromise on tax hikes for the rich”, https://www.salon.com/2021/10/17/no-surrender-progressives-must-not-compromise-on-hikes-for-the-rich/

    (excerpt)

    Far more out of sync with mainstream Democrats than the supposedly radical progressive wing of the party, Sinema, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and a small group of House Democrats led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey are threatening to tank President Biden’s agenda unless Congress first passes an inadequate, poorly designed bipartisan infrastructure bill funded (in part) by selling off our strategic oil reserves rather than raising taxes on billionaires, who have added $1.8 trillion to their collective net worth during the pandemic. The Pandora Papers leak has showcased exactly how the rich and powerful manipulate tax policies and financial systems to avoid taxes. Democrats who refuse to hold them accountable are culpable — and they and the Democratic Party will pay the cost at the ballot box in 2022.

    It’s time for Democrats to get serious about exorcising the rot from the heart of their party, and to stand up to these legislative hostage-takers. At this pivotal moment, the best and only way for Democrats to stand for the voters who put them in office is to stand publicly against the members of their caucus who are only looking out for wealthy investors and corporations.

    It’s time for progressive Democrats to back up their criticisms of the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party with action — by embracing a long-overdue public showdown for the soul of the party. If Democrats ever want to win another election, they must make it clear that politicians who are willing to kill trillions of dollars of much-needed aid for American families to preserve low tax rates for their donors have no place in the Democratic Party. This is not a moment for progressives to come to a compromise with their corporate-backed peers — it’s time to defeat them and reclaim the Democratic Party.

Comments are closed.