Democratic Primary: ‘It’s Over’

7
723

The Democratic primary election is no longer about the nuanced policy details and differences between the candidates positions on a broad range of issues, if it ever really was (who is best able to beat Donald Trump was always the defining issue).

We are now in a global coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on the economy. Americans are scared, just as they were in 2008 when Wall Street and the financial system were melting down and the Bush administration appeared incompetent to handle it. Americans are now scared that an incompetent Trump administration is unable to handle a pandemic and the resulting economic crisis.

One exit poll question asked of voters on Tuesday was all anyone really needed to know as to where this Democratic primary was headed: “Who do you trust to handle a major crisis?” March 10 exit polls:

In Michigan, 50 percent of voters said they’d trust Biden the most of the Democratic field to handle a major crisis, with 31 percent choosing Sanders. Biden had a double-digit edge over Sanders on the same question among Democratic voters in Washington and Missouri, as well.

And not to put too fine a point on it:

A majority of Democratic voters casting ballots across four states said choosing a candidate who they believe can win is more important than choosing one who agrees with them on major issues. Majorities of voters in exit polls from Washington, Michigan, Missouri and Mississippi all supported that position[.]

Ron Brownstein of The Atlantic has a steely-eyed analysis of the reality of where this Democratic primary stands after Tuesday. It’s Over:

After two insurgent campaigns that rattled American politics, Bernie Sanders’s dream of becoming the Democratic presidential nominee is effectively over.

Tapping an enormous wave of grassroots energy in both bids for the White House, Sanders galvanized young people, transformed online fundraising, and changed the terms of debate in the Democratic Party on issues ranging from health care to college affordability. But as his defeats last night made clear yet again, his unflinching call for a “political revolution” could not build a coalition broad enough to capture the ultimate prize.

Former Vice President Joe Biden remains well short of the 1,991 delegates needed for a nomination on the first ballot at the Democratic National Convention in July. But his resounding victories last night, and his widening delegate lead, prompted even some of Sanders’s ideological allies to question whether the senator from Vermont should continue his campaign.

“Sanders should start thinking through what outlet he has to draw concessions from Biden, and it’s not clear to me that continuing a presidential campaign that does not have a path to victory is one of those options,” says Sean McElwee, a co-founder and the executive director of the liberal research and advocacy group Data for Progress, which has been polling extensively in the primary states. “I think he should … think soberly about the reality. I don’t think there are any states right now he is favored to win.”

The rest of March is going to be brutal. Five Thirty-Eight (as of March 9):

Screen Shot 2020-03-11 at 11.08.44 AM

Others on the left did not go so far. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which had endorsed Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts before she withdrew, issued a statement urging Sanders to remain in the race at least through this Sunday’s scheduled CNN debate in Phoenix. Robert Reich, a leading liberal economist and a former labor secretary under Bill Clinton, likewise told me Sanders should push forward through the debate.

“People are going to be asking themselves as they watch that debate who is going to be better able to take on Trump one-on-one,” Reich said. “The stampede toward Biden was remarkably fast. That shows that his support is not absolutely steadfast, so it’s at least possible that if his debate performance is very bad on Sunday, Bernie Sanders could have a renaissance.”

Bob, Bob, Bob. You sound like the jilted boyfriend who is begging “C’mon baby, please give me just one more chance!” as his ex-girlfriend is walking up the aisle at her wedding to her new boyfriend. Americans know Joe, they know what they are getting, and they are forgiving of his occasional “gaffes.” Joe would literally have to die on stage in order to change the trajectory of this race. A “bad” debate performance (no matter what Biden says, Sanders supporters are going to say he had a bad debate performance) is going to change nothing.

But across much of the party, Biden’s triumphs in Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, and Idaho confirmed the message sent by his victories on Super Tuesday: that the question is no longer whether, but when, the former vice president becomes the party’s nominee against Donald Trump.

As in last week’s contests, Biden last night dominated among African Americans; led among college-educated white voters; and even topped Sanders, albeit more narrowly, among blue-collar white voters, who had preferred the senator in each of the year’s first four contests. Compounding Sanders’s problem across the country, the young voters who generally preferred him by large margins over Biden consistently represented a smaller share of the total vote than they did four years ago, according to exit polls conducted by Edison Research for a consortium of media organizations.

“If he’s not going to win working-class [white voters], and he’s going to lose [black voters] massively, and the turnout is all with his opponent’s people and not his … there is just no path to victory,” says Tad Devine, who served as a senior strategist for Sanders in 2016 but is unaffiliated with any campaign this year. “It’s just that simple.”

Biden tried to project confidence in his victory speech last night, delivering conspicuously calm and measured remarks focused on the general election. And he offered the kind of conciliatory praise for Sanders that usually comes at the end of a primary race. “I want to thank Bernie Sanders and his supporters for their tireless energy and their passion,” Biden said during his speech in Philadelphia on Tuesday night. “We share a common goal, and, together, we’ll defeat Donald Trump.” “We will defeat him together.”

Sanders, meanwhile, spoke volumes about his precarious situation by choosing not to speak at all last night.

While Democratic leaders more or less tolerated Sanders’s continuing his 2016 campaign against Hillary Clinton until June of that year, the party’s desire to beat Trump will likely make it much less forgiving of another extended crusade, Devine told me. “Biden needs the spring and the summer without Bernie,” he said. “I think Bernie is smart enough and reasonable enough to recognize that [it’s irrational] to keep this thing going for the sake of—what?”

Another option for Sanders could be to remain in the race in order to keep attention on the policy issues he cares about, but to mute his criticism of Biden. Jesse Jackson, who endorsed Sanders last weekend, followed that model in the latter stages of the 1988 Democratic primary, which Michael Dukakis ultimately won. Several Democratic operatives, though, say one major difference between 2020 and 1988 could complicate this approach: Sanders’s aggressive network of supporters is unlikely to muffle its criticism of Biden even if the candidate himself does. That could translate into escalating demands for Sanders to quit.

Beyond Democrats’ concerns about Trump, McElwee believes that Sanders will likely face more pressure to cede the field because of the coronavirus outbreak and the new constraints on campaigning. Such concerns prompted both Biden and Sanders to cancel events yesterday.

“Two things that are different about this year than 2016: One is … there are not going to be any races that he has any plausible shot at winning where he is going to be able to rebound,” McElwee told me. “And I think you had a little bit more mood among the electorate and establishment at large [in 2016] that said, ‘Let’s have a guy out there making a moral case.’ At this point … I think the Democratic base is much more terrified of Trump this cycle than last cycle and [is] going to respond less well to a long, drawn-out primary, particularly in the midst of a pandemic.”

The calendar doesn’t offer Sanders any reprieve. Next Tuesday, he must compete in Florida, where polls show him facing a cavernous deficit following his recent comments praising aspects of Fidel Castro’s rule in Cuba; Ohio, where he lost badly in 2016; and Illinois, where the state Democratic leadership has rallied around Biden and polls show the former vice president holding a hefty lead. Only Arizona, with its large Latino population, seems like it could be hospitable to Sanders, but even there the most recent survey found Biden comfortably ahead. Georgia, whose large black population establishes Biden as the clear favorite, follows a week later.

For Sanders, the losses last night were especially stinging because they came mostly in states where he ran well against Clinton four years ago. In that race, Sanders narrowly won the primary in Michigan; captured about two-thirds of the vote or more in Idaho, North Dakota, and Washington (where the elections were held as caucuses last time); and finished only 0.2 percentage points behind Clinton in Missouri. Only in Mississippi was he routed.

This time, though, Sanders continued to struggle to expand his support beyond the enthusiastic base that has filled his arena-size rallies and swelled his fundraising totals. Even at the outset of voting this year—when Sanders finished in a virtual tie for first place in Iowa and then won the subsequent contests in New Hampshire and Nevada—he attracted only between one-fourth and one-third of the total vote.

The big question for Sanders at that point was whether he could add to his coalition once the race consolidated, which it did with stunning speed when both former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota ended their candidacies and endorsed Biden just before Super Tuesday. Warren followed them off the field that Wednesday, after failing to win a single state the night before.

So far, Sanders, in key states, has failed to add to his base. On Super Tuesday, he exceeded 37 percent of the vote only in his home state of Vermont. In a two-person race last night, he drew only about 37 percent in Michigan, 35 percent in Missouri, about 33 percent in Washington, and an anemic 15 percent in Mississippi. Only in the smaller contests of Idaho (which he lost) and North Dakota (which he won) did Sanders cross 40 percent of the vote.

Demographic patterns largely followed the grooves cut on Super Tuesday. Biden ran up significant margins among college-educated white voters in Missouri and Mississippi, and carried them more narrowly in Michigan, a state where Sanders posted a double-digit advantage among them in 2016. Preliminary exit results also showed Biden winning those voters in Washington. Starting on Super Tuesday, Biden has won white-collar white voters in 13 of the 16 states in which exit polls have been conducted.

Biden last night also maintained his substantial advantage among African American voters. He won the support of nearly nine in 10 of them in Mississippi. As in 2016, Sanders has run more competitively among black voters outside the South. But even so, the exit polls last night found Biden winning about two-thirds of them in Missouri and Michigan, almost exactly matching Clinton’s performance last time. Biden has carried African Americans in every state with enough of these voters to measure in an exit poll.

Perhaps most disappointing for Sanders, the exit polls in Missouri and Michigan found Biden also narrowly winning the support of white voters without a college degree. (Not enough of them voted in Mississippi for the exit poll to record their preferences.) The preliminary exit results also showed Biden winning them by a slim margin in Washington.

Sanders carried non-college-educated white voters in Missouri and Michigan last time (no 2016 exit poll was conducted in Washington), and he targeted them this year by lashing Biden over his support for free-trade agreements and his earlier openness to cutting Social Security as part of a “grand bargain” with Republicans to reduce the deficit. Since Super Tuesday, Biden has carried blue-collar white voters in 12 of the 16 states in which exit polls were conducted (assuming his lead in Washington survives the final exit-poll revisions).

The sweep of Biden’s victory last night was best captured in the Detroit metro area. He beat Sanders by about 20 percentage points both in Wayne County, which includes heavily African American Detroit, and Oakland County, a white-collar suburb that has moved toward the Democrats in recent years. Biden also beat Sanders by about 17 points in Macomb County, the home of white, blue-collar “Reagan Democrats” who have drifted toward the GOP.

One final headwind battered Sanders. In a repeat of Super Tuesday, Biden dominated among voters who self-identified as Democrats in Missouri, Michigan, and Mississippi alike, and he carried them more narrowly in Washington.

After losing partisan Democrats badly in his 2016 run, Sanders had performed more competitively among them in the first contests this year. But at his moment of greatest triumph this cycle, after winning New Hampshire and Nevada, he sent a series of belligerent signals to the party. Among them: insisting he is running against “the Democratic establishment,” renouncing any general-election help from the billionaire Michael Bloomberg, and declaring that he would only pick a vice president who supports Medicare for All.

These factors likely contributed to Biden’s winning streak: He’s now won self-identified Democrats in every state with an exit poll since Super Tuesday, save for Vermont, California, and Colorado [where early voting was occurring before South Carolina].

“The other flawed theory of this [Sanders] campaign is that you can win the nomination of a major political party by running against that political party,” Adrian Hemond, a Democratic consultant in Michigan, told me. “Democratic activists have invested the last 25, 30, 40 years of their lives in the party, and he was saying [to them] this was all bullshit. How’s that supposed to work?’”

On Tuesday, at least, the answer was that it didn’t work. Now, at 78, with his second campaign facing a lower ceiling of support than his first, Sanders and his leagues of ardent supporters are confronting the near-certainty that after years of organizing and struggle, he will never conquer the Democratic Party as its presidential nominee.

It’s time for Bernie Sanders to face this reality and make a graceful and conciliatory exit, and to support the presumptive nominee. Joe Biden needs to be able to announce his running mate and to begin running a general election campaign against Donald Trump as soon as possible. Democrats are not going to tolerate another grudge match with no clear path to victory all the way to the convention in Milwaukee this year. This is not how Sanders should want to be remembered.

Defeating Trump and supporting Democratic candidates for office is the only objective.




7 COMMENTS

  1. You are not really interested in this subject, are you John, you just want to make sure the Biden/GOP talking point gets spread around.

    Sleazy move from the same guy that cost Arizona 2 billion dollars a few years ago, and whose legacy continues to cost Arizonan’s money.

  2. Sander’s might be counting on Biden displaying signs of cognitive decline in one-on-one debates. Most people suspect it might be an issue and it would be hard for Biden to hide it in a debate with only Sanders and him on stage. Time will tell.

    • “Joe Biden’s verbal stumbles have voters worried about his mental fitness. Maybe they’d be more understanding if they knew he’s still fighting a stutter.” John Hendrickson at The Atlantic, What Joe Biden Can’t Bring Himself to Say, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/01/joe-biden-stutter-profile/602401/

      My youngest brother suffered from severe stuttering as a child and was mocked mercilessly for it by cruel children, no doubt much like you. He has learned to overcome that stutter but occasionally will slip into it, and this brings back painful memories from our childhood. So much for compassion, empathy and understanding.

    • John, I’m wondering how many people are actually going to watch the Town Hall now that “it’s over”.

      On one hand, this feels like uncharted waters with the pandemic and how ill-prepared our country is to manage it. Bernie Sanders could certainly make an even stronger case for Medicare-For-All based on this. But there’s also the worldwide economic fallout that’s getting very real, and it will be interesting what each of them has to say.

      My observation of Biden during debates is that he tended to become defensive quickly which seemed to cause him to talk very fast and stumbled over some words. However, there are a lot of videos of him doing stump speeches where he’s clearly confused.

      What is worrisome, IMO, is the way he’s interacting with some people, calling them names like “horse’s ass” and poking his finger in their faces, etc… which means that he’s either a horse’s ass himself or he’s having some problems with impulse control.

      People who are hoping for Biden to show cognitive decline at the Town Hall probably are not going to see it. I’m a hell of a lot more interested in what the corporate Democrats that he represents intend to do about the pandemic and the coming recession.

  3. It is over, and I’m putting my issues and concerns with Biden and the DNC on hold until November 4th.

    Trump is endangering the lives of millions of Americans, there are still children in cages, and right now he’s pushing for a stimulus package for airlines and hotels.

    His family business is hotels. He’s only looking out for himself.

    I should not have my tax money go to prop up failing businesses, any “stimulus” should go to the employees who may lose hours/jobs.

    We can’t take another minute of this guy let alone 4 more years.

Leave a Reply