Faith based supply-side ‘trickle down’ economics has made Arizona one of the poorest states in the country


Follow up to So how’s that faith based supply-side ‘trickle down’ economics working out for you, Arizona?

That faith based supply-side “trickle down” economics has made Arizona one of the poorest states in the country. Arizona remains among worst in poverty:

trickle downStarting from the top, an estimated 21.2 percent of all Arizonans in 2014 were at or below the federal poverty line.

Nationally, it was 14.8 percent.

That was bad enough to rank third-worst in the nation. Only Louisiana and Mississippi had higher rates.

Perhaps more worrisome, Arizona’s poverty rate went up in 2014 while the nation stayed the same.

The last time Arizona’s rate looked like the nation as a whole currently does was 2007, when Arizona ranked 10th-worst in the nation with 14.3 percent of its residents in poverty.

The share of people with no more than half the income of the poverty line last year was also high in Arizona, 9.2 percent. That’s about one in every 11 people.

For the nation as a whole, it was 6.6 percent, or one of every 15 people. Arizona ranked fourth among states by this measure.

Among working-age adults, those between 18 and 64 years old, Arizona was fourth-worst. Among seniors, those 65 and older, the state was fifth. (Alaska and Wyoming were not included.) For children, those 17 and younger, Arizona came in fifth.

Arizona’s stubbornly high poverty levels help explain why the state has seen little drop among those who receive food stamp assistance.

According to the state’s Department of Economic Security, in August there were slightly more than 1 million people receiving aid from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, as food stamps are known.

That’s a little more than were enrolled in the program in December 2009, when it first crossed the 1 million line. Nearly 130,000 fewer people receive aid now than did during the peak in October 2011, but the state has topped 1 million 66 of the past 69 months.

The average assistance for those on food stamps in Arizona was $121 in August, or $3.89 per day.

But wait, there’s more!

The Arizona Capitol Times (subscription required) reports, Arizona failing to produce enough college graduates to fill critical jobs:

Arizona is not producing enough college graduates to fill the high-tech and other professional jobs it will take to finally boost the state out of the basement of personal income, according to a new report released on Oct. 1.

The findings of the nonpartisan Center for the Future of Arizona show the state is “fairly well positioned” to meet the needs of employers who need workers with mid-level skills. These are the ones that require at least some college, an associate degree or some advanced technical training.

“But mid-skill jobs also are vulnerable if new innovations make it possible to substitute technology for human labor or if they can be outsourced overseas,” the report states.

The jobs less likely to be automated or shipped elsewhere are those with at least a college degree. But the report says Arizona is not producing enough of them.

“If current workforce projections are even close to accurate, the challenges will be greater for employers seeking high school graduates and college graduates with a bachelor’s degree or more,” it says.

“We are not producing enough well-educated people for our workforce, both for what we have now and what we would like to encourage to come here,” said former Arizona State University President Lattie Coor, the organization’s chairman.

* * *

Leaving ArizonaCoor said it isn’t simply that Arizona universities are not producing sufficient graduates to meet the needs. There’s also the problem of those who do get a degree deciding to pursue their fame and fortune elsewhere.

He said surveys have consistently shown that people believe “Arizona is not a particularly good place for talented young people.”

“Part of it is just the sense of culture, the sense that young people want to be, where the ‘buzz’ is, where the millennials like to live,” Coor said. He believes, though, that situation is getting better.

Harder to solve, though, is the question of employment.

“There are limited opportunities in the way our economy is configured for them to have opportunities for them to step up in salary and step up in responsibility,” Coor said.

All that shows up in national statistics.

The report says the state’s prosperity and productivity are declining compared not only to the national average but also many of the neighboring states.

On an individual level, it says the state’s per capita income continues to slide. The report puts it at $39,027. And even after adjusting for the cost of living, that’s less than 85 percent of the national average – and dead last in the country.

The report . . . says that per capita figure as a percentage of national income has never been lower going back to when the numbers first became available in 1929.

There’s also a political side to all this, with many of the decisions made at the Capitol affecting the factors that create high school grads ready to take on college and provide sufficient opportunities for students to get degrees.

Only thing is, Coor found that Arizonans as a whole just don’t get involved in politics – and, more to the point, don’t try to influence the people making the decisions.

Consider: Just 9.3 percent of Arizonans said they have contacted a public official. Only five states had lower participation rates.

Only 5 percent of Arizonans said they express political opinions online frequently, ranking Arizona No. 49 out of all states and the District of Columbia. It was 47th in belonging to an organization, 48th in working with neighbors to fix something –x and dead last in the percentage of people who attend public meetings.

* * *

“[T]here’s also not been a kind of culture that grows and reinforces itself to say, ‘Hey, if you don’t like the way things are going you can do something about that,’” he said.

Coor, whose group hopes to affect the future of the state by getting people to focus on critical issues, called that lack of involvement “the Achilles’ heel of Arizona.”

He acknowledged it could be a chicken-and-egg situation: People don’t get involved because they don’t think they can make a difference, and their lack of involvement means their voices are not heard.

But he said the same dynamics can work in reverse. Coor said getting to know lawmakers and other public officials can lead to a belief that there are ways to move the conversation.

“It starts person by person, it starts neighborhood by neighborhood,” Coor said.

There are numerous social science and political science studies that demonstrate the correlation between poverty and political apathy and non-engagement. Poverty is an effective form of voter suppression by which the economic elite maintain their political dominance. The failure of faith based supply-side “trickle down” economics as an economic theory nevertheless has been extremely effective as a form of voter suppression. The 2014 election was The Worst Voter Turnout in 72 Years.

Democracies die from indifference and neglect.

Previous articleSeptember jobs report reflects slowing global economy
Next articleWe have a contest for Speaker of the House
AZ BlueMeanie
The Blue Meanie is an Arizona citizen who wishes, for professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics. Armed with a deep knowledge of the law, politics and public policy, as well as pen filled with all the colors stolen from Pepperland, the Blue Meanie’s mission is to pursue and prosecute the hypocrites, liars, and fools of politics and the media – which, in practical terms, is nearly all of them. Don’t even try to unmask him or he’ll seal you in a music-proof bubble and rendition you to Pepperland for a good face-stomping. Read blog posts by the infamous and prolific AZ Blue Meanie here.


  1. they don’t care if you challenge them. they don’t care about you. they only care about hispanics registering and voting.

  2. Another effective form of voter suppression is Democratic candidates who are too timid to challenge the supply-side Gospel.

Comments are closed.