Howard Fischer reports, Judge blocks state’s new voter registration law:

A federal judge has blocked the state from enforcing a new law that he said could inadvertently make felons out of volunteers who register people to vote.


In a 22-page order, Judge Murray Snow said the provision in SB 1260, approved earlier this year by the Republican-controlled legislature, is so poorly written that anyone reading it would not know what is — and is not — legal. And that, he said, makes it unconstitutionally too vague to be on the books.

Snow also said he won’t let the state implement another part of the same law detailing when county election officials are required to cancel a voter’s registration. The judge said it runs afoul of the National Voter Registration Act, which requires that the person be notified before being taken off voter rolls.

The judge’s order is not the last word.

It still gives Attorney General Mark Brnovich the chance to argue that the two provisions are in fact legal. But it means no one will be arrested for violating the new law and no registrations will be canceled under its terms until there is a final ruling — if then, as the judge said he already believes the challenge ultimately is likely to succeed.

SB 1260, sponsored by Sen. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, was one of dozens of measures proposed by GOP lawmakers this past session amid claims that changes were needed to prevent fraud.

It includes language making it a Class 5 felony to anyone who “knowingly provides a mechanism for voting to another person who is registered in another state.” That carries a presumptive 18-month prison term.

He said the target is anyone who would forward an early ballot addressed to someone not living in Arizona.

Mesnard acknowledged he has no first-hand knowledge of people getting early ballots from Arizona who are registered elsewhere. Instead, he said, “folks (have) come to me and insist this has happened,”

“I’ve had folks come to me and insist this has happened,” he said.

“I’ve not gone to investigate,” he continued. But Mesnard said that his legislation will “make it clear” what the law requires.

So any rando MAGA/QAnon election denier shares the latest “Q” conspiracy theory with this fool and he puts it into a bill, and then he gets all of the Republicans in the legislature to vote for it. This is quite literally insane, and is a threat to democracy.

Only thing is, Snow wrote, the bill does not define what is a “mechanism.”

“Thus, in the context of SB 1260, the ordinary meaning of ‘mechanism for voting’ could include any necessary items involved in the process of voting,” the judge said. And that, he said, is where it creates legal problems for the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, Voto Latino and Priorities U.S.A., the groups that challenged the law, groups that sign people up to vote.

For example he said, a voter registration form is a “mechanism for voting” as registration is a prerequisite to being able to cast a ballot.

“It is entirely possible that plaintiffs, in registering newly arrived residents, may be charged with knowledge that those new residents didn’t cancel their previous voter registrations,” Snow wrote. “Plaintiffs would thus have committed the new felony if registering a voter is a mechanism for voting.”

If nothing else, the judge said, the lack of clarity in the law will chill voter registration efforts as individuals can’t know how law enforcement officers, prosecutors or state judges might seek to define the phrase that lawmakers did not.

Brnovich, in a bid to keep Snow from blocking the law, avowed to the judge that the challengers were in no danger of being prosecuted for voter-registration activities. And Brnovich said he could promise that because he is the only one who would be served with the complaint.

Snow was not impressed.

“As the attorney general acknowledges, his interpretation will not bind his successor in office,” the judge said, pointing out that Brnovich will be gone at the end of the year.

The other provision that Snow blocked deals with those already registered to vote in Arizona.

It says if a county recorder receives “credible information” that someone is registered in another county and confirms that fact, the recorder must cancel that person’s registration.

Attorney Daniel Arellano argued that creates a situation where someone who has moved loses his or her registration in both the old and new counties. What’s worse, he said, the person doesn’t even know.

Snow said the legal issue is even more basic than that.

He said the National Voter Registration Act spells out the ways a state can cancel someone’s registration.

One is if the person directly requests to be removed from the rolls.

States also can cancel a registration if the person has confirmed in writing he or she has moved out of the registration area. And cancellation is allowed only after providing notice followed by a specified waiting period.

SB 1260, he said, complies with none of those provisions.