
I was speaking to an old friend recently, and he said that he didn’t see who would be our “hero.” The right wing has theirs, the one we’ve viewed as a buffoon who has managed to throw a wrecking ball into so many of our institutions in a few weeks. And we have some very clever and insightful champions, like Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, and for many, AOC and Bernie Sanders (and more recently, Jasmine Crockett). But can any of them inspire a broad movement, as Obama did in 2008?
I’m actually not certain that any hero is the determining factor, though. In each case, wasn’t the real push coming from broader conditions? Was LBJ really that inspiring a President, or was he pushed into leading us with groundbreaking legislation?
What about MLK Jr?
An Exceptional Leader, To Put It Mildly
Martin Luthor King Jr. was indeed a great man – my brother had the good fortune to briefly work with him, helping out a bit with one of his speeches, and unsurprisingly he was very impressed by the man. In one of my brother’s autobiographical memoirs, he wrote: “There began my four year study of his regal posture, nonverbal leadership confidence, speaking tone shifts, and fully focused attention on whomever he was spending time with. What was It about this man, our human family cousin, to endear him so completely to those of us whose path he crossed? Existentialists might say it was his clear righteous purpose in life, a primary mission he was willing to die for. And did.”
Part of what stood out about the man, in addition to his critical work on civil rights, was his expansion to economic justice, and his willingness to openly oppose the American expansion of the Vietnam War. My brother reported: “Almost all staff advised against these initiatives, especially the Vietnam one … King reflected quietly. Silence. Then he announced he would do the right thing.”
It took many years and many lives lost before our leaders abandoned the Vietnam misadventure. Arguably, the battle for racial equity is still ongoing, 60 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act. And with the mindless, kneejerk reaction against all initiatives even hinting at “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion” (all of which I had thought were positive things), we seem to be taking steps backward. So even with a hero, a great man, and great achievements, history moves along with fits and starts.
Here and now, is it a hero that we need?
In the 70s I used to read the comic strip “Pogo”. One of the phrases I recall from that cartoon was, “We have found the enemy, and it is us.” While there have certainly been villains in our story, ultimately it is the American people who have brought us to this point. But if we are the enemy, we are also the hero. We are the ones who have made America a multiracial, multicultural society. We are the ones who can sometimes look up from our personal problems and joys, and join together to change the world. We’ve done it before, and we can do it again.
And we must. There is no one else. Groups like Indivisible can work to rally people for events, the Democratic Party can provide support for candidates to oppose the looming autocracy, and even professional groups like the American Medical Association can fight against the ignorance that threatens public health. Scientists and our supporters can rally against the destruction of the core systems that protect and advance us (there are rallies in Tempe and Tucson today on this very topic).
“We are the ones we have been waiting for”
A recent analysis by Erica Chenoweth has suggested that a tipping point for the effectiveness of nonviolent protest is for 3.5% of the population to participate. We’re not there yet. I wouldn’t claim that this number is a law of nature; but it is certainly true that our representatives in government can often respond to widespread public action. And it’s an even more reliable truth that lacking such public pressure, we can’t count on government to do anything. Or as Lincoln reportedly said, “In this age, in this country, public sentiment is everything. With it, nothing can fail; against it, nothing can succeed.”
This is where we are now. There is a malignant force that has gained power in our country, and we need to oppose it. Publicly, and in any peaceful way that we can. It’s not going to be easy, but there is no alternative.
We are the heroes we have been waiting for.
All of us.
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
If Warren, Buttigieg, AOC, and, Sanders are your leaders, you are screwed. I always thought Newsom was your apparent leader but I guess you will jettison him because he thinks it unfair that biological males who identify as females competing against real females in sports is unfair. Strange because 80% of those polled believe biological males should not compete against biological females.
Also, why did you omit Harris. Buyers remorse?
Actually my point was that the real leaders are the grassroots, and politicians follow. Warren et al have enthusiastic followers, and sometimes being outspoken in your views can help, as opposed to trying to focus group your stated beliefs.
As for Newsom, for me he has always been a mixed bag. He was out early supporting same sex marriage, which seemed brave, but he lost support when he was telling everyone to stay at home but ended up in a fancy dinner at the French Laundry, a very pricey restaurant in wine country. As for trans issues, it would be nice to actually have data rather than taking a poll – the science appears to be unclear on this issue. But regardless, we still can do our best to be kind.
I appreciate your civil and thoughtful response, which is a rarity on BfA. I would reply by saying that the grassroots by definition are not leaders but, hopefully, the leaders that they elect represent them.
Newsom is a mixed bag and more politician than ideologue. But we have data on trans and sports. 80% of the people say it is wrong for biological males who identify as females to participate in female sports because it is unfair and, at times, dangerous to the females.
I try to be kind and my school bathroom, locker room, shower, and overnight hotel room bill says reasonable accommodations be given trans students. Also, my pronoun bill allows the use of non-biological sex pronouns to be used, so long as parents are told and consent.
Briefly: by “data” I was not referring to what people think about the topic; I was referring to learning about genetic advantages in sports, for which I think there is little information about trans athletes. There are many other genetic factors that affect performance, like those that affect height and weight, and there are real chromosomal rarities that come into the picture as well. So I think there is still more to learn there.
So what does that mean operationally? Keep sexes separate for the sake of safety? We do know that males are larger and stronger. Plenty of data on that.
Two things.
One, there’s a lot of information about trans athletes. They have been around since at least the 70’s, when tennis player Renee Richards won the right to compete.
Second, since trans folks are only .52% of the population and the number of trans athletes in the USA is five, count ‘em, you only need one hand, FIVE, why are we letting a far right fringe nutjob like Kavanagh drive the conversation?
This is how they won in 2024. Arizona is last or near last in most things we don’t want to be last in, and it’s Kavanagh’s party that’s been driving this bus for decades.
Instead of holding him and his creepy party accountable we let them drag us into identity politics.
John Kavanagh’s fascination with trans men is weird, and not helping Dems cause.
Feeding the trolls is futile.
And he started this with “buyer’s remorse” about Harris, a shitty childish little thing to say.
He’s a common troll.
This guy again with the “biological males”.
Never seems to worry about biological females. Interesting.
Hey Johnny, .52% of the population identified as trans, yet your comments are 50% about biological males.
Seems like something Freudian is going on inside that smooth, shiny brain of yours.
Maybe we should change it to LGBTQJGCK.