Mike Lindell Bankrolls Kari Lake And Mark Finchem Lawsuit To Ban Ballot-Counting Machines In Arizona

Howard Fischer reports, Lawsuit seeks to ban ballot-counting machines in Arizona:

Two Trump-endosed election denier Republicans seeking statewide office are asking a federal judge [United States District Court for the District of Arizona] to block the use of machines to tabulate the votes in Arizona in the 2022 election.

The machines are unreliable because they are subject to hacking, contend “Krazy Kari” Lake, a gubernatorial hopeful, and insurrectionist Mark Finchem, who is running for secretary of state. And the use of components in computers from other countries makes them vulnerable, they say.

Note: Just last month, an independent audit by former Republican congressman John Shadegg, hand-picked by election denier Senate President Karen Fann, found Maricopa County’s ballot tabulation system was never connected to the internet during the 2020 election and there were no routers to inspect (debunking Trump’s “but the routers!” conspiracy theory). Shadegg report from “audit” finds no internet connection for ballot tabulation equipment:

The county on Wednesday released the results of Shadegg’s investigation, which found no evidence of internet connectivity by the county’s Ballot Tabulation Center. Fann asked that Shadegg’s team examine routers and Splunk logs, which are records of events and tasks that occur in a network. Shadegg’s report said there were, in fact, no routers or splunk logs to examine.

The is an even more basic problem, says Andrew Parker, the attorney who filed the lawsuit on their behalf.

The tabulation of votes is an inherently governmental function, he said. Yet by using machines built and programmed by private companies the state has effectively farmed that out that obligation.

And what’s worse, Parker said in his filings, is that the technology is kept secret from the public.

“This lack of transparency by electronic voting machine companies has created a ‘black box’ system of voting which lacks credibility and integrity,” he wrote in a copy of the lawsuit furnished to Capitol Media Services.

It seeks a court order to have the 2022 election conducted with paper ballots [they already are] which would be counted by hand, calling it “the most effective and presently the only secure election method.”

Any election expert would tell you that this is absolutely false. This introduces human error into the counting of ballots, and more importantly, the potential for nefarious mishandling and miscounting of ballots by Trump’s army of MAGA/QAnon election worker volunteers which he is recruiting for this purpose. They should not be allowed anywhere near a ballot.

The Arizona Senate’s GQP sham “fraudit” of Maricopa County ballots for just two races last year was supposed to take just a few weeks, remember that? Hand counting every race on every ballot in Arizona could take  months (it must be completed before the statutory deadline to certify election results.)

Note: Voting machines have been used in Arizona since 1881, but a GOP bill would bar them:

Voting would return to 19th Century methods — with their glacial pace and flawed accuracy -– and reduce voter access under legislation Republicans approved in a legislative committee that would ban machines from counting votes, critics said.

The proposal is rooted in the Big Lie, a belief that the 2020 election was “stolen” from Donald Trump. Although there are various evidence-free theories purporting to explain how that happened, a prominent one is that ballot-counting machines were rigged to switch votes from Trump to Joe Biden.

The idea has been tossed out of court for a lack of evidence, and a biased election review conducted last year by the Arizona Senate examined ballot tabulators in Maricopa County and found nothing to back up the claim.

Nonetheless, a state legislator who has built a nationwide political following by espousing widely debunked lies about the 2020 election says machines designed to quickly count ballots more accurately than humans are likelier to result in false results because of cheating.

“This is paper only ballots, this does away with the machines,” [QAnon election denier] Sen. Wendy Rogers, R-Flagstaff, said about her Senate Bill 1338.

She cited QAnon conspiracy theorist Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan as the inspiration behind attempting to prohibit any technology use in future elections. The company directed the so-called “audit” of the 2020 election, despite having no experience analyzing elections or knowledge of Arizona election law. Logan, like Rogers, was a vocal proponent of election lies that the outcome was affected by rampant fraud, and he worked to persuade U.S. senators to overturn elections in Arizona and other battleground states.

“He said, ‘Senator Rogers, we need to go back to paper ballots, and they need to be counted by hand,’” she said.

Howard Fischer continues:

Neither Lake nor Finchem agreed to be interviewed on the lawsuit.

But Lake, in a Facebook interview with Trump supporter Mike Lindell, said the litigation is the result of what she believes was a stolen 2020 election.

Anyone who works with this fucking idiot and Coup Plotter (Trump ally Mike Lindell of My Pillow pushes martial law at White House) lacks any credibility and is automatically disqualifed from ever serving in any public office. Period.

“We know how tragic it was that this election (was) corrupted the way it was here in Arizona,” she said. “And we don’t want it to happen again.”

The lawsuit also cites what Parker said were “irregularities and evidence of illegal vote manipulations” in voting systems used in the 2020 election. While most of the incidents were from elsewhere, the list includes claims from the Cyber Ninjas “audit” of Maricopa County’s election process about things like software and patch protocols not being followed and missing files.

County officials responded to each of the allegations months ago, saying those findings were in error and proved that Cyber Ninjas, which had never done such a review, clearly did not understand election equipment, procedures or laws.

But Parker also said the lawsuit is not an attempt to undo the 2020 presidential results in Arizona which gave Joe Biden the state’s 11 electoral votes.

“It is only about the future — about upcoming elections that will employ voting machines designed and run by private companies, performing a crucial governmental function, that refuse to disclose their software and system components and subject them to neutral expert evaluation,” he wrote. “It raises the profound constitutional issue: Can government avoid its obligation of democratic transparency and accountability by delegating a critical government function to private companies?”

At the heart of the complaint are the contentions by some, particularly among those like Lake and Finchem who still deny the results of the 2020 election, that it was stolen. While some of the issues involve unproven allegations that forged ballots were inserted into the system, there has been a consistent litany of complaints that the hardware and software used to tally ballots was hacked or, worse, actually was programmed to produce a win for Biden.

“The parallels between the statistical analysis of Venezuela and this year’s election are astonishing,” wrote Cyber Ninjas owner Doug Logan even before being hired by Senate President Karen Fann to review the results. That refers to claims that there was a link between Dominion Voting System and the family of now-deceased dictator Hugo Chavez.

“I’m ashamed how few Republicans are talking about it,” Logan said.

Dominion Voting Systems has sued everyone for business defamation. You can check the status of each of the cases filed here. Dominion Voting Systems – Legal Updates.

Parker makes no such claims. Instead he wants a judge to prohibit the use of electronic voting machines in Arizona “unless and until the electronic voting system is made open to the public and subjected to scientific analysis by objective experts to determine whether it is secure from manipulation or intrusion.”

Arizona does have various systems designed to check equipment.

For example, counties are required to conduct “logic and accuracy” tests, both before and after the official tally. That process, done in public, involves taking a known set of ballots and running them through the tallying equipment to ensure that the results reported by the machines matches what actually has been marked.

Parker contends those tests don’t prove anything to deal with what he said are “security problems inherent in the use of electronic voting machines.”

“All post-election audit procedures can be defeated by sophisticated manipulation of electronic voting machines,” he claims. [The maximalist conspiracy theorist position.]

He specifically cited the refusal of Dominion to surrender its passwords to Cyber Ninjas for examination, with Dominion attorneys saying granting such access to the workings of its equipment violated the company’s protections against illegal search and seizure.

But what Parker does not mention – lack of candor to the court – is that there was an agreement between the Senate and the county that allowed three independent experts, including one recommended by the Senate, to examine the equipment. They reported that the system was not connected to the internet and that there was no evidence of data deletion, data purging, data overwriting or other destruction of evidence.

In seeking a court order, Parker wants more than just the use of paper ballots in 2022.

He also wants each ballot to have a unique identification number known only to the voter so each can tell if his or her ballot was counted properly. And Parker said each ballot would be printed on specialized paper that cannot be counterfeited.

The Republican-controlled legislature actually mandated the use of “anti-fraud ballot paper” in 2021. But it was voided by the Arizona Supreme Court which ruled that the provision was placed illegally into unrelated budget legislation.

A similar measure was introduced this year but has not been approved.

So in effect, Lake and Finchem are trying to do through a lawsuit what Sen. Wendy Rogers has not been able to advance through the GQP-controlled Arizona legislature. This is a legislative matter, not a legal matter.

While the issue of voting machines has largely been a Republican talking point, the lawsuit does have at least one indication of bipartisanship: attorney Alan Dershowitz is part of the legal team.

“You have to understand I’m a liberal Democrat,” he said during the Lindell Facebook interview.

“I’m happy with the results of the election,” Dershowitz said. “This is about whether or not votes are being properly counted.”

Oh, Bullshit! This disreputable hack is a Fox News regular and defended Donald Trump in his impeachment trial.

Goddamn, Howie, I can’t believe you actually parroted Dershowitz’s B.S. in your reporting. You brag on your Twitter account “exposing B.S. 50+ years.” You failed to call B.S. on Dershowitz.

BTW, Dershowitz is a criminal defense attorney, and no one considers him an expert on election law.

You also glossed over Lake’s Facebook inteview with Mike Lindell and failed to point out that it is actually Mike Lindell who is behind this lawsuit (and is likely paying the attorneys fees and costs).  See, Frank The Voice of Speech, Mike Lindell & Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake, Attorney Alan Dershowitz on Injunction Filed in Arizona Regarding Electronic Voting Machines (video at the link).

Lindell says “we are starting with Arizona to get rid of the machines.”

Once again, Arizona is ground zero for the next scam of the MAGA/QAnon cult election deniers after their failed GQP sham “fraudit” last year. Lindell says South Dakota is next.

“Krazy Kari” Lake continues to repeat already debunked conspiracy theories. She clearly drank the full pitcher of Kool-Aid.

This attorney Andrew Parker is a Minneapolis attorney. He says he represents My Pillow and Mike Lindell.

Mark Finchem and Mike Lindell yuck it up asserting that Attorney General Mark Brnovich is “conflicted out” of representing Secretary of State Katie Hobbs because he is also a named defendant in this lawsuit.

So what this vexatious litigation is really all about is performance politics.  “Krazy Kari” Lake is running against Katie Hobbs for governor, and Mark Finchem is running for Secretary of State so they can both rig the 2024 election for Donald Trump (or for whomever is the GQP nominee).

And nobody likes our attorney general Mark Brnovich aka “Nunchucks” (or is it numbnuts?), who is running for the GQP nomination for U.S. Senate.

AG Nunchucks has his own performance politics lawsuit against Secretary of State Karie Hobbs.

AG Nunchucks did this to try to gain the endorsement of Donald Trump. It didn’t work, he will endorse someone else. E.J. Montini at The Republic explains the Anatomy of an unsuccessful lie: Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich edition.

Quite literally every Republican running for office in Arizona is corrupt to their core. They have all bent the knee and kissed the ring (or ass) of Donald Trump and promote his Big Lie. If you want to save American democracy, not one of these Republicans can be elected to office.




2 thoughts on “Mike Lindell Bankrolls Kari Lake And Mark Finchem Lawsuit To Ban Ballot-Counting Machines In Arizona”

  1. Laurie Roberts of The Republlc writes “Kari Lake and Mark Finchem throw in with Mike Lindell to sue the state (read: us)”, https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2022/04/25/kari-lake-mark-finchem-mike-lindell-election-fraud-tabulation-lawsuit/7440467001/

    Get ready to open your wallets, Arizona. Again, that is.

    The state’s dynamic duo of delusion, Kari Lake and Mark Finchem, have embarked upon yet another quest to rid Arizona of all that elections fraud they can’t seem to find. This time, by eliminating the vote counting machines they are convinced robbed Donald Trump of his second term.

    Lake and Finchem on Friday sued the state of Arizona and Maricopa County, asking a federal judge to bar the use of tabulation equipment in the 2022 elections. The lawsuit is being underwritten by none other than MyPillow CEO/Trump champion Mike Lindell, who is on a nationwide quest to rid the country of the demon machines.

    We’ve been down this lawsuit road before

    Of course, any credible elections expert would tell you that machine counts are far more accurate than hand counts, but don’t let credibility get in the way of a good conspiracy chase.

    Which brings us to Lindell’s stooges and their Lake/Finchem “civil rights” lawsuit:

    “Plaintiffs have a constitutional and statutory right to have their ballots, and all ballots cast together with theirs, counted accurately and transparently, so that only legal votes determine the winners of each office contested in the Midterm Election,” they wrote.

    Yeah, yeah. Lather, rinse, repeat. Heavy emphasis on the lather part.

    Far-right politicians – in a quest for fame and fortune and a move up the political food chain – have spent the last year and a half foaming at the mouth about the many devious ways in which Dominion Voting Systems stole the 2020 election.

    About a Venezuelan (or possibly Chinese?) plot to secretly switch thousands of votes from Trump to Joe Biden. (Never mind that the post-election audit required by state law showed an exact match between a sampling of ballots counted by hand and machine.)

    Remember the “Kraken” lawsuit, filed by state GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward and company? That lawsuit claimed that “at least” 412,494 Arizona ballots were phony, many of them due to Dominion’s machinery that was hacked to allow “computerized ballot stuffing” of a sort that made Hugo Chavez a fan favorite in Venezuela.

    It was laughed out of the court by a federal judge who noted that “gossip and innuendo” does not constitute evidence.

    It’s not about facts. Lake and Finchem want to win

    Remember Maricopa County’s independent audit? The Republican-run county Board of Supervisors hired two sets of elections experts to try to reassure that the election was on the up and up. Those experts concluded that the tabulation equipment wasn’t manipulated or connected to the internet and thus wasn’t hacked to steal the election.

    Remember the three IT experts who examined the county’s routers and Splunk logs, under the watchful eye of a special master (former GOP Rep. John Shadegg) agreed to by the Senate and Maricpa County?

    All three experts separately concluded that the tabulation equipment wasn’t connected to the internet and thus wasn’t hacked to steal the election.

    Remember the Senate’s own audit? It provided the most convincing evidence of all that the tabulation equipment wasn’t hacked to steal the election.

    A hand count of the county’s 2.1 million paper ballots matched the machine count, showing Biden the winner. But if the machines had been hacked, wouldn’t that hand count of paper ballots be diff …

    Oh, never mind.

    This isn’t about logic or facts or reality.

    This is about a pair of Trump-endorsed candidates hoping to ride their phony claims of election fraud right into the state’s top two jobs, governor and secretary of state.

    This logic is as soft as Lindell’s pillows

    They’ve teamed up with Lindell, whose logic is about as soft as the pillows he hawks in his infomercials. Lindell on Saturday called the Friday filing of the lawsuit “a historical day in history – in the history of America.”

    Lindell on Sunday told Business Insider that he plans to bankroll lawsuits across the nation, starting with Friday’s filing in Arizona. He estimates he’s spent $500,000 on the Arizona lawsuit, which names Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and the Maricopa and Pima County boards of supervisors.

    [Business Insider: “MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is bankrolling a nationwide push to halt the use of voting machines in elections — starting with Arizona”, https://www.businessinsider.com/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-bankrolls-injunctions-stop-voting-machines-2022-4%5D

    No word on how much it’ll cost Arizona taxpayers, who already have shelled out millions of dollars as a result of this crazy conspiracy chase.

    Lake’s and Finchem’s lawsuit asks a judge to block the use of machine tabulation “until the system is made open to the public and subjected to scientific analysis to determine whether it is absolutely secure from manipulation or intrusion.”

    Sigh

    Are there any real experts left, at this point, who haven’t examined Maricopa County’s machinery?

    Trump, naturally, is thrilled with the lawsuit, given that the Senate’s election audit was one big fizzle and Attorney General Mark Brnovich has thus far refused to charge elections officials with imagined crimes.

    “Every state should follow the lead of the Patriots in Arizona where yesterday Kari Lake, Mark Finchem and others filed a lawsuit to ban electronic voting machines and replace them with a transparent hand count,” Trump said on Saturday, during a rally in Ohio. “Hand, hand, hand count system! Paper – paper, paper, paper! We don’t have to worry about signals being sent down from the sky!”

    Or, it would seem, from anybody with the ability to think logically.

    Lindell, meanwhile, told Business Insider that he plans to file lawsuits across the land, “as many as I can afford.”

    And the appeal for cash will land in Republican inboxes in five … four … three …

  2. “Statement from BPC Task Force on Elections: Ballot Tabulators Are Essential to Election Integrity ”, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/press-release/statement-from-bpc-task-force-on-elections-ballot-tabulators-are-essential-to-election-integrity/

    Today, the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Task Force on Elections released the following statement on ballot tabulators being essential to election integrity:
    Ballot tabulators are the latest targets of the campaign to undermine voter confidence in the name of election security. Recent efforts to limit the use of tabulators in at least six states and countless local jurisdictions have been based on the premise that hand counting ballots is the gold standard of accurate results. In reality, banning machine tabulation would undermine election integrity and sow distrust.

    Tabulators boost the integrity of election systems nationwide by improving accurate and timely results and reducing resource demands on election offices. We encourage states and localities to redirect their focus on hand counts toward other, evidence-based integrity measures. The best way to enhance the legitimacy of election results is to pair the use of tabulators with robust tabulation audits of paper ballots after every election, as noted in the Task Force’s report Bipartisan Principles for Election Audits.

    A tabulator is a specialized device that captures and counts voter selections from paper ballots. Tabulators are subject to extensive security protections and are certified before use, typically by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Nearly all election jurisdictions also conduct public logic and accuracy tests of tabulators before each election to ensure that they are properly programmed. If the use of tabulators were curtailed, staff and poll worker shortages would abound, costs would rise, and results would take longer and be less accurate.

    Hand counting is time and resource intensive, often relying on bipartisan teams to count each ballot multiple times. Ballots typically include many races and ballot initiatives; while tabulators can accommodate multiple ballot questions with ease, each additional item in a hand count raises the propensity for error and increases the time and resources necessary to complete it.

    Hand recounts of single races alone often take days and hundreds of additional workers to complete; hand counting full ballots with dozens of contests could take weeks or months. This would require a significant expansion in the number of election workers, which is untenable when jurisdictions nationwide already struggle to staff in-person voting operations.

    Furthermore, extended results reporting timelines are precarious for voter trust as candidates can capitalize on these periods of uncertainty to cast doubt on the results and, in certain cases, preemptively declare themselves the winner. At this pivotal moment in our democracy, we must invest in shared democratic norms and values—not deplete them.

    For an in-depth explanation of how ballot tabulators improve the accuracy, efficiency, and trustworthiness of election results, read BPC Elections’ explainer: How Ballot Tabulators Improve Elections.
    This statement is unanimously endorsed by the BPC Task Force on Elections. The Task Force is a geographically and politically diverse group of 26 state and local election officials from 18 states devoted to making meaningful improvements to American elections.

Comments are closed.