Well that didn’t take long. The day after the election, the Republican Governor’s Association (RGA) was on the air with an attack ad against Democratic gubernatorial candidate Fred DuVal. The RGA would have you believe that Fred DuVal is single-handedly responsible for tuition increases at Arizona colleges during his tenure as a regent on the Arizona Board of Regents. (By the way, the Governor is an ex-officio member of the Arizona Board of Regents. Ariz. Const. Art. 11, Sec. 5).
The ad requires Arizonans to erase from their memories the recent history of our Tea-Publican controlled Arizona legislature making devastating budget cuts to higher education over the signature of Gov. Jan Brewer since the start of the Bush Great Recession in 2007.
Here are some helpful reminders for those of you who suffer from short-tern memory loss, from The Atlantic. A Truly Devastating Graph on State Higher Education (March 20, 2013):
The chart below from the Center On Budget and Policy Priorities estimates how much each of the 50 states has slashed per-student funding for its university systems since the start of the recession, adjusted for inflation. In Arizona, where the cuts were the deepest, funding has been hacked in half. Nationwide, legislatures have sliced off 28 percent on average.
These cuts aren’t the only reason the cost of a public education has jumped in the last several years, but they’re an essential part of the story. As the CPBB notes, there have been some truly astronomical tuition increases since 2008 — with the sticker price of school rising more than 50 percent in seven different states.
* * *
In January, using the same data as the CPBB, I charted the changes in total funding in each state, without accounting for inflation or changes in enrollment. By that measure, 38 states had cut their higher-ed budgets over the past five years. In Arizona, where the budget tightening was again most severe, funding fell by 36 percent.
The Tea-Publican controlled Arizona Legislature failed to fund higher education in direct violation of its constitutionally prescribed duties under Ariz. Const. Art. 11, Sec. 6: “The university and all other state educational institutions shall be open to students of both sexes, and the instruction furnished shall be as nearly free as possible“; and under Ariz. Const. Art. 11, Sec. 10: “[T]he legislature shall make such appropriations, to be met by taxation, as shall insure the proper maintenance of all state educational institutions, and shall make such special appropriations as shall provide for their development and improvement.”
These constitutional provisions require the Arizona Legislature to impose taxes sufficient to support state educational institutions. These provisions do not permit the Arizona Legislature to make the most devastating cuts to higher education in the nation and to shift those costs to students by imposing higher tuition. (Note: There are Arizona Court decisions which have allowed the Arizona Legislature to escape these prescribed duties.)
A Republican member of the Arizona Board of Regents came to the defense of Fred DuVal from this scurrilous attack ad, which seeks to shift blame from the Tea-Publican controlled Arizona Legislature to a single member of the Arizona Board of Regents:
Former Regent Responds To RGA Attack
Phoenix, AZ — Anne Mariucci, a Republican business leader and former member of the Arizona Board of Regents, today responded to the Republican Governors Association ad attacking Fred DuVal.
“I’m a Republican and I need to correct the record about this highly inaccurate political attack on Fred DuVal,” said Mariucci. “I worked by Fred’s side to save our public universities when the Arizona legislature decimated higher education during the Great Recession. They cut our public universities deeper than any state in the country, forcing tuition increases on Arizona students.
“Fred DuVal actually kept the doors of education open to students from working and middle class families by increasing financial aid for students, developing more partnerships between community colleges and universities, and developing new campuses in rural Arizona.”
“Fred and I personally developed the formula requiring the universities to reduce costs before raising tuition, and Fred was always the loudest voice in the room to protect students from unnecessary tuition hikes. To cast him in any other light is just wrong.”
###
You do realize, don’t you, that the ad of which you speak influenced far more people than the article you posted here? Here you are preaching to the choir. The ad preached to the voters. Don’t get me wrong, I honestly found your missive to be enlightening and informative. I was unaware of many of the facts you brought out. But it didn’t influence me to change my vote. There are many more issues out there that influence me more.
Comments are closed.