Ronald Reagan on Torture

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

After listening to the Republican apologists for the Bush torture program on the "news" (sic) programs over the weekend, I was struck by how the chattering class of conservative commentators who worship at the altar of Saint Ronald Reagan and quote his every word as if holy scripture so utterly fail to quote Reagan on the subject of torture. Perhaps it is because to do so would expose their hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy in stark relief.

These torture apologists have conveniently thrown history down the memory hole. It was, after all, President Ronald Reagan who agreed to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and had his Deputy Secretary of State John C. Whitehead sign on behalf of the United States on April 18, 1988, at the United Nations. The United States became the 63rd nation to sign the Convention. U.S. signs UN convention against torture | US Department of State Bulletin

President Ronald Reagan attached the following message to the U.S. Senate recommending ratification of the Convention Against Torture (which the Senate ratified) (emphasis added):


With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, subject to certain reservations, understandings, and declarations, I transmit herewith the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The Convention was adopted by unanimous agreement of the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1984, and entered into force on June 26, 1987. The United States signed it on April 18, 1988. 1 also transmit, for the information of the Senate, the report of the Department of State on the Convention.

The United States participated actively and effectively in the negotiation of the Convention. It marks a significant step in the development during this century of international measures against torture and other inhuman treatment or punishment. Ratification of the Convention by the United States will clearly express United States opposition to torture, an abhorrent practice unfortunately still prevalent in the world today.

The core provisions of the Convention establish a regime for international cooperation in the criminal prosecution of torturers relying on so-called "universal jurisdiction." Each State Party is required either to prosecute torturers who are found in its territory or to extradite them to other countries for prosecution.

In view of the large number of States concerned, it was not possible to negotiate a treaty that was acceptable to the United States in all respects. Accordingly, certain reservations, understandings, and declarations have been drafted, which are discussed in the report of the Department of State. With the inclusion of these reservations, understandings, and declarations, I believe there are no constitutional or other legal obstacles to United States ratification, The recommended legislation necessary to implement the Convention will be submitted to the Congress separately.

Should the Senate give its advice and consent to ratification of the Convention, I intend at the time of deposit of United States ratification to make a declaration pursuant to Article 28 that the United States does not recognize the competence of the Committee against Torture under Article 20 to make confidential investigations of charges that torture is being systematically practiced in the United States. In addition, I intend not to make declarations, pursuant to Articles 21 and 22 of the Convention, recognizing the competence of the Committee against Torture to receive and consider communications from States and individuals alleging that the United States is violating the Convention. I believe that a final United States decision as to whether to accept such competence of the Committee should be withheld until we have had an opportunity to assess the Committee's work. It would be possible for the United States in the future to accept the competence of the Committee pursuant to Articles 20, 21, and 22, should experience with the Committee prove satisfactory and should the United States consider this step desirable.

By giving its advice and consent to ratification of this Convention, the Senate of the United States will demonstrate unequivocally our desire to bring an end to the abhorrent practice of torture.


There are several Republican Senators who voted to ratify the Convention Against Torture who are still serving in the U.S. Senate today, including our own Sen. John McCain. These Republican Senators should be among the most vocal advocates for demanding that the United States "prosecute torturers who are found in its territory" pursuant to our treaty obligations and the rule of law — as Ronald Reagan would do. Instead they make lame excuses and have become apologists for illegal torture by the Bush administration.

Moral bankruptcy.

0 responses to “Ronald Reagan on Torture

  1. Saturday, May 2, 2009

    Enhanced Interrogation Techniques: The Need Is Clear! Let’s Go To The Videotape

    The Taliban Moves To Within 60 Kilometers Of Controlling Nuclear Weapons

    Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

    For those on the extremely naive and holier than though left, read this very, very carefully.

    If there was any question regarding the use of any technique at our disposal to pull actionable information out of terrorists, I believe the transcript and clip below of Kuwaiti Professor Abdallah Al-Nafisi speaking on the topic of terrorist attacks on the United States should go a long way towards quelling it.

    Unless of course you are an employee of the ACLU, or someone that is willing to die, going to the grave with your incorrect principles intact.

    Now this professor does not speak for everyone, but for enough to be a concern at the highest level.

    This is an excerpt from a specch on Al-Jazeera in February, 2009:…

  2. nobama, Article Six of OUR Constitution says that our treaty against torture makes the treaty “Law of the Land”.

  3. Hey, nobama, how about we obey our own laws? Torture is against U.S. law.

  4. Ronald Reagan’s Dept. of Justice prosecuted a Texas sheriff and three deputies for using waterboarding to coerce confessions from prisoners. And this was before the U.S. ratified the Convention Against Torture.

    Federal prosecutors secured a 10-year sentence against the sheriff and four years in prison for the deputies. But that 1983 case – which would seem to be directly on point for a legal analysis on waterboarding two decades later – was never mentioned in the four Bush administration opinions released last week.

    The failure to cite the earlier waterboarding case and a half-dozen other precedents that dealt with torture is reportedly one of the critical findings of a Justice Department watchdog report that legal sources say faults former Bush administration lawyers – Jay Bybee, John Yoo and Steven Bradbury – for violating “professional standards.”

    Bybee, Yoo and Bradbury were well aware of the case law, but simply chose to ignore it in order to give the Bush administration what it had asked for.

  5. Where in the United States Constitution does it say:” We The People Of The United States Shall abide by The Laws of Switzerland?”

  6. Article Six of our Constitution:

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    So when wingers demand we follow the Constitution, they are practically demanding we throw Dick Cheney in the slammer.