SCOTUS Rejects Trump’s Bogus Assertion Of Executive Privilege Over National Archives Records (Updated)

Christmas came almost a month late, but it finally did come. I hate to say I told you so – oh hell, who am I kidding – I told you so! 

Reuters has a no pay wall report, U.S. Supreme Court spurns Trump bid to keep Capitol attack records secret:

Advertisement

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected former President Donald Trump’s request to block the release of White House records sought by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol investigating last year’s deadly attack on the Capitol by a violent mob of his supporters.

The decision means the documents, held by a federal agency that stores government and historical records, can be disclosed even as litigation over the matter continues in lower courts.

Only one of the court’s nine members, radical Republican Justice Clarence Thomas, publicly noted disagreement with the decision.

Trump’s request to the justices came after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Dec. 9 ruled that the businessman-turned-politician had no basis to challenge President Joe Biden’s decision to allow the records to be handed over to the House of Representatives select committee.

Trump and his allies have waged an ongoing legal battle with the committee seeking to block access to documents and witnesses. Trump has sought to invoke a legal principle known as executive privilege, which protects the confidentially of some internal White House communications, a stance rejected by lower courts.

The brief Supreme Court order noted that the weighty question of whether a former president can assert an executive privilege claim did not need to be answered to resolve the case.

“Because the court of appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former president necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision,” the unsigned order said.

The House committee has said it needs the records to understand any role Trump may have played in fomenting the violence that unfolded on Jan. 6, 2021. His mob stormed the Capitol in a failed bid to prevent Congress from formally certifying Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory over Trump.

The committee has asked the National Archives, which holds Trump’s White House records, to produce visitor logs, phone records and written communications between his advisers. [It is also beleved to include draft executive orders and a draft presidential speech for the seizure of voting machines and ordering a re-do election in several states Trump lost based on his Bg Lie that the election was stolen. It may also include draft orders or memos to the Pentagon, involving using the military in his attempted self-coup. If these documents do exist, it would be the “smoking gun” for a seditious conspiracy charge.]

President Biden, who took office two weeks after the riot, has determined that the records, which belong to the executive branch, should not be subject to executive privilege and that turning them over to Congress was in the best interests of the nation. Trump has argued that he can invoke executive privilege based on the fact he was president at the time even though he is no longer in office.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Nov. 9 rejected Trump’s arguments, saying he had not acknowledged the “deference owed” to Biden’s determination that the committee could access the records and adding: “Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President.”

The bipartisan select committee is comprised of seven Democrats and two Republicans.

[A]ny delay by the Supreme Court in allowing the disclosure of the records could have imperiled the panel’s chances of obtaining them. The committee aims to finish its work before the November congressional elections in which Trump’s fellow Republicans are seeking to regain House control. Republicans opposed the panel’s creation and could shut down the inquiry if they win a majority in the chamber.

The National Archives was already set to turn over a tranche of documents to the January 6 Committee today. Now it can load up the boxes on the truck and deliver it all to the committee. Small number of Trump-era White House documents set to be turned over to January 6 committee:

The National Archives plans to release four pages of Trump-era White House documents to the House on Wednesday, in what appears to be the first time the committee that’s investigating the January 6 riot would get records that former President Donald Trump wants to keep secret.

The documents are set to go to the House committee at 6 p.m. on Wednesday, according to a court filing from the Archives, which holds all of the Trump White House records. [SCOTUS ruled before 6:00 p.m. The boxes of records can now be delivered to the committee at any time.]

Trump’s legal team has ratcheted up its attacks of the Biden administration’s position on releasing the four pages. As the deadline neared on Wednesday, Trump’s team made public multiple letters to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals complaining of the plan.

One letter called the Archives’ decision “contemptuous behavior,” and the Archives’ choice to notify the court that four pages would be turned over an attempt to “prophylactically inoculate itself and its officers from contempt proceedings.”

In another court filing on Wednesday morning, the National Archives, represented by the Biden Justice Department, said it wasn’t intentionally misleading the court about its plan to turn over documents to the House, as Trump’s team had accused them of doing.

The Trump team, the Archives said, hadn’t done what’s needed in time to block the release of four pages being handed over.

Trump “hires only the best people.” Jesus Christ, the lawyers he has hird are some of the worst lawyers I have ever seen in my life, and shockingly so.

“The release of certain records from tranche four — that Appellant has known for over a month would occur today — will not violate any order of any court. Indeed, that is presumably why Appellant has asked the Supreme Court to enjoin release of documents from that tranche. The Supreme Court, however, has not acted on that request,” lawyers for the administration wrote. [SCOTUS acted only hours later.]

It’s not clear what those four pages include, and should they be turned over, it would be up to the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol to make them public.

[T]he select committee is seeking more than 700 pages of disputed documents as it explores Trump’s role in trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election. That includes his appearance at a January 6 rally in which he directed followers to go to the US Capitol where lawmakers were set to certify the election results and “fight” for their county.

The documents include activity logs, schedules, speech notes and three pages of handwritten notes from then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows — paperwork that could reveal goings-on inside the West Wing as Trump supporters gathered in Washington and then overran the Capitol, disrupting the certification of the 2020 vote.

Mark Meadows’ bogus assertion of executive privilege is now moot. The Department of Justice should now indict him on the committee’s referral for contempt of Congress. Merrick Garland needs to stop dragging his feet.

Trump is also seeking to keep secret a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died in the siege and memos and other documents about supposed election fraud and efforts to overturn Trump’s loss of the presidency, the National Archives has said in court documents.

Broadly, the Trump White House records could answer some of the most closely guarded facts of what happened between Trump and other high-level officials, including those under siege on Capitol Hill on January 6.

It will take staff attorneys for the committee several days to sift through the documents once they have been received, but I anticipate some explosive revelations in the coming weeks.

UPDATE: After the SCOTUS ruling, the Committee tweeted:





Advertisement

Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “SCOTUS Rejects Trump’s Bogus Assertion Of Executive Privilege Over National Archives Records (Updated)”

  1. Brad Reed reports, “Mark Meadows now in ‘extra legal jeopardy’ thanks to SCOTUS ruling on Trump documents: legal expert”, https://www.rawstory.com/mark-meadows-capitol-riot-2656437011/

    Writing on Twitter, New York University School of Law professor Ryan Goodman argued that, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to end former President Donald Trump’s attempts to block the National Archive from handing over key Capitol riot-related documents, Meadows is now in “extra legal jeopardy” over his refusal to cooperate with the investigation.

    Specifically, Goodman notes that Meadows’s “defense against contempt of Congress” charges was “based in part on executive privilege claim” made by Trump.

    Now that the court has ruled that Trump can no longer assert executive privilege over these particular documents, Goodman argues that Meadows “may want to comply” with the committee’s requests even though he’s already received a criminal contempt referral.

    Additionally, writes Goodman, the committee “can also now scrutinize whether Meadows failed to turn over records to National Archives,” which he noted that the committee “has suggested potential violation of Presidential Records Act and potential Obstruction.”

  2. Matthew Chapman reports, “Legal experts slam ‘mind-boggling’ Clarence Thomas dissent in case over Trump’s Jan. 6th records”, https://www.rawstory.com/clarence-thomas/

    Political scholar Norm Ornstein, took aim at Justice Clarence Thomas — the lone dissenting justice — for not recusing himself from the case, given his wife’s public support for the Capitol insurrectionists as the attack was unfolding.

    Sarah Burris reports, “Wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas signs letter against Jan. 6 committee”, https://www.salon.com/2022/01/19/wife-of-justice-clarence-thomas-signs-letter-against-jan-6-committee_partner/

    It has been less than a week since 11 Oath Keepers were arrested with seditious conspiracy, but the spouse of Justice Clarence Thomas believes that they “have done nothing wrong.”

    Bulwark’s Charlie Sykes pointed to a letter signed by Ginni Thomas along with many other fringe conservatives like the Family Research Council, the chair of the Tea Party Patriots Fund and the president of the Club for Growth. The letter speaks out against Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), who serve on the Jan. 6 committee.

    It adds to questions about Mrs. Thomas that surfaced after the attack at the U.S. Capitol. On Jan. 6, she was supporting the violence as it unfolded on her social media. When screen captures were being circulated, she promptly deleted her Facebook account, as Law and Crime observed at the time.

    Mrs. Thomas has a “long history of incendiary rhetoric, particularly online,” CNN.com reported in a report about “rankled” former clerks of Judge Thomas.

    It prompted progressives to ask the Jan. 6 Committee to call Thomas to answer questions about whether she helped fund any of the operations through her Republican organization Groundswell. Others said that Thomas should be recused from any cases that ultimately involve Jan. 6 as a result.

    “Even worse, however, is the fact that no matter how far his wife takes her antics, Justice Thomas will likely not face any real repercussions for it,” CNN noted in their expose of Mrs. Thomas. “Under federal law, justices must recuse themselves from cases in which their ‘impartiality might reasonably be questioned,’ or where their spouse has ‘an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome.’ However, such recusals almost never happen on the Supreme Court. The reality is that while Congress can impeach justices for egregious conduct — a step not taken since 1805 — there is no real mechanism for enforcing ethical rules against them.”

  3. No surprise that Clarence Thomas would vote to protect the racist Vulgar Talking Yam’s backside. If Thomas was part of the Antebellum South he would be comfortably ensconced in the master’s house.

    Samuel L. Jackson, who played Stephen in Django Unchained, has said that he modeled his performance using Clarence Thomas as an inspiration.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fz98_pfh7E

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWmTl99ML5Y

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81wXgubXYwo

Comments are closed.