Senate Health Care Reform Bill to Include the Public Option (Opt Out)

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced today the Senate Health Care Reform bill:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that the merged health care bill will include a public option allowing states to opt-out. Reid: Public Option No 'Silver Bullet' But Strong Consensus For Opt-Out:

"Under this concept states will be able to determine whether the public option works best for them," Reid told reporters. He said it was the "fairest" way to go.

Reid said after "countless hours" of talking to his caucus, there is a "strong consensus" for this plan. He said he will not submit a plan with a triggered public option to the Congressional Budget Office.

"As we've gone through this process, I've concluded, with the support of the White House and Senators. Dodd and Baucus, that the best way to move forward is to include a public option with an opt out provision for states," Reid said.

Reid said he was "disappointed" the public option had "frightened" Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) but that he hoped she would "come back."

I just don't understand all the attention paid to "Queen Olympia" Snowe. It was always a misguided waste of time and energy. Queen Olympia has never been a reliable partner in the past and she cannot be counted upon now. Sen. Reid's refusal to send Queen Olympia's "trigger" option to the CBO for scoring may mark the end of this nonsense.

Queen Olympia has been playing an "inside-outside" game – she was the GOP's inside game in negotiations to undermine the bill as much as she possibly could, and failing that, the GOP's outside game of AHIP and FreedomWorks and Fox News would try to finish the job. There was never any good faith negotiation here. President Obama and Senate leaders should just forget about kissing Queen Olympia's ass, they are never going to get her meaningless vote. Just produce a Democratic-consensus bill and be done with it.

Reid said he is a "strong supporter" of the public option but that is is "not a silver bullet." He said it was a key way to ensure competition among insurers and "to level the playing field."

Today Reid implied that under the current bill, states will have until 2014 to opt out of the government plan.

He also said "there will be a co-op in this bill."

In the next several hours, Reid will send the CBO a draft bill with alternative provisions on certain issues, to get a range of cost estimates on the plan he'll bring to the floor.

Wait, the bill also includes Sen. Kent Conrad's (D-ND) untested and unproven co-op plan that Sen. "Mad Max" Baucus (D-MT) couldn't sell to his own Senate Finance Committee? (Queen Olympia Snowe supported the non-profit cooperatives plan as well. ) Is this lame co-op plan included just to bring along Sens. Conrad and Baucus?

Whatever works. Baucus: I Support Harry Reid And A Public Option Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus, who was reportedly none too pleased when he learned that Harry Reid was leaning towards putting a public option in the Senate's health care bill, is now singing a much more positive tune. "It is time to make our system work better for patients and providers, for small business owners and for our economy. It is time for health care reform," Baucus said.

For more than a year, we've been working to meet the goals of reducing the growth of health care costs, improving quality and efficiency and expanding coverage. There are a tremendous number of complicated issues that go into reform and the public option is certainly one of them. I included a public option in the health reform blueprint I released nearly one year ago, and continue to support any provision, including a public option, that will ensure choice and competition and get the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate. Success should be our threshold and I am going to fight hard for the 60 votes we need to meet that goal this year.

The opt-out public option is the compromise plan of Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY). Schumer: Opt-Out Is 'The Best Compromise' That Can Potentially Get 60 Votes The Senator has released the following statement:

"Leader Reid has always been a strong supporter of a public option that could help keep the insurers honest, and today he showed just how deep his commitment is. The public option has new life because as Americans have learned more about it, they have come to see it is the best way to reduce costs and increase competition in the health insurance industry. This form of public option is not exactly what either liberals or moderates would want. But a public plan based on a level playing field, with an opt-out for states, is the best compromise that has the potential of getting 60 votes in the Senate."

The White House has issued a statement as well. Gibbs: Obama Is 'Pleased' Public Option Included:

"The President congratulates Senator Reid and Chairmen Baucus and Dodd for their hard work on health insurance reform. Thanks to their efforts, we're closer than we've ever been to solving this decades-old problem. And while much work remains, the President is pleased that at the progress that Congress has made. He's also pleased that the Senate has decided to include a public option for health coverage, in this case with an allowance for states to opt out. As he said to Congress and the nation in September, he supports the public option because it has the potential to play an essential role in holding insurance companies accountable through choice and competition."

The last "unofficial" whip count in the Senate – which occurred before Sen. Reid's press conference, and before the bill is scored by the CBO, and before the President does any arm-twisting – was in the 57-58 vote range. The problem conservadems are Ben Nelson (D-NE), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR). This assumes that Sens. Conrad and Baucus are on board with the co-op plan also being included in the bill.

These senators are free to vote their conscience and constituencies on the final vote for the bill, but on a procedural vote for cloture to end debate (a filibuster), there should be no doubt that they will vote with their Democratic caucus. It is a matter of party loyalty and discipline. A senator filibusters this bill at ther own peril. Any Democratic senator who filibusters this bill should pay the price with the loss of committee chairmanships and leadership positions, and be cut off from any campaign funds from Democratic Party organizations. Give us an up or down vote.

I believe that there will be no Republican votes. Republicans have made a strategic decision to be the party of no and the status quo. They were never interested in bipartisanship, only in defeating the Health Care Reform bills so they can assert that Obama failed in a cynical game of partisanship. Any more concessions to Republicans will only weaken the bill further. Republicans and their conservadem fellow travelers in the Senate have already done enough to water down the Senate bill. It's time to advance this bill.


Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Senate Health Care Reform Bill to Include the Public Option (Opt Out)”

  1. As Grassely and DeMint have stated, they won’t vote for healthcare reform even if they got everything they wanted, but view it as Obama’s waterloo or failure. If you read Kristol’s 93 memo to Republican’s on defeating Clinton’s plan, nothing has changed. He admits 79% want significant change, including government run healthcare, but he’s more concerned with party ideology. There isn’t even concern for the national economy. The same tactics used today were developed then. It’s a very revealing memo.

    I have to wonder what the Democratic party stands for other than an organization to pay dues to? The fact single payer was “taken” off the table before negotiations started lost a lot of leverage for compromise for significant health reform. I’m not sure which party I’m madder at. If anything Democrats proved they were no better than Republicans when PEOPLE were not included in developing major policies.

    Then political leaders wonder why people are so apathetic towards government… DOH. They are rendered helpless by the people they elect who could care less once they get in office. Congress’ position on healthcare reform is dramatically different than what the majority want – that’s pointed out in poll after poll, demonstration after demonstration.

    The same polls reframed by the GOP showing Obama’s support is softening ignore the polls go down when he sounds like he’s softening on it (not the reverse) and I have never seen a polls that shows more than 20% approve of the Republican plan – Yet the GOP leads the debate. That’s why Congress approval ratings always lag behind. They aren’t any better than the party everyone thought they voted out. It feels like a betrayal. No one elected Snowe as president.

    The state legislature is the same way. They live on a different planet. I’m not even sure the sky is blue there. But are any alternatives offered to run? Nope. There’s no one to vote for and I don’t have to wait to know that. Democrat party hands us more Democrat dues paying GOP, if anyone at all.

    Blue Dogs were organized by a Republican.

  2. Your disingenuousness is tiresome. As Senator Reid explained in his comments, when he first came to Washington, Republicans and Democrats sat down together and said “here’s the problem, how do we fix it?,” and they were able to craft bipartisan legislation. That is the Congress that I worked with in the past.

    The current Republicans in Congress are a different animal. Their goal is simply to obstruct, not to contribute any meaningful solutions in any way. They have offered none. They see passing health care reform as only aiding the Democrats, through partisan lenses. What the American people want (70% of Americans want health care reform) and need is irrelevant to Republicans. GOP national chairman Michael Steele has said that ” I don’t think we need a comprehensive overhaul of our healthcare system…” http://mediamattersaction.org/blog/200910190001

    It is all partisan election politics all the time. There is no sense of governance. It is a form of chaos theory: out of chaos we can win an election – but then what? Republicans have not articulated any plan for governance to the American people. Just saying no to Democrats is not a plan.

    Most Republicans do not view Ron Paul as a Republican. He is a libertarian interloper who uses the party label for his narcissistic quest for the presidency. The guy represents a tiny fraction of voters on the fringe of American politics, nowhere close to ever achieving a governing majority. It’s a delusional fantasy.

  3. Hmmmm… its only bipartisan if you agree with the Democrats… its only progress if you agree with the Democrats… its only reform if you agree with the Democrats…?

    The Republicans as the party of No? I’ll believe that when the Republicans support No more Predator drone bombing of Afghanistan.

    No more insane government borrowing… I’ll believe the Republican Party as the party of No when I see it.

    The Republican Party does have one member who could start teaching them how to be a real Party of No.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=Dr+No+Ron+Paul

Comments are closed.