The Perpetual War Party wants its war with Iran

I have noticed that the mainstream media — particularly disturbing is PBS which really  ought to demonstrate better judgment — has trotted out the Neocon architects of the Bush-Cheney regime’s unnecessary and illegal war in Iraq and illegal torture program to comment on the P5+1 world powers nuclear agreement with Iran.

NurembergTwo quick points. First, these unindicted war criminals should not be given legitimacy by giving them a seat at the table to discuss the nuclear agreement with Iran. They have forfeited any right to speak by virtue of their war crimes. The only time I want to hear from these Neocons is under oath before a Nuremberg-style war crimes tribunal (there is no statute of limitations for war crimes).

Second, if the feckless media is going to give them a seat at the table anyway, it should preface their remarks with a litany of their failures war crimes in Iraq, and make a full disclosure that these Neocons are actively engaged in seeking the next war with Iran. If the media is not going to inform the public, then do not invite these Neocons to appear on your network programs. Otherwise, the media is, once again, a complicit accessory to war crimes (and the media is also liable to prosecution under the Nuremberg Principles.)

Matt Yglesias at Vox.com has a pair of posts explaining GOP opposition not just to to the Iran agreement, but to negotiations with Iran at all, in pursuit of their desired goal for war with Iran. Why Iran hawks can’t be honest about why they hate the Iran deal:

Iran hawks displeased with the nuclear deal struck between Iran, Russia, China, the United States, and the European Union have an awful lot of complaints. But if you look closely at what they are saying, you’ll notice something funny. They don’t actually have any arguments about what Obama has done wrong or how a different administration would park the situation in a better place. What they have instead are a lot of talking points, MacGuffins, red herrings, and distractions that aim to divert attention from the core issue — hawks’ desire to avoid diplomacy and have a war.

Read more

Former American ambassadors and nuclear non-proliferation experts support the Iran nuclear agreement

The New York Times reports today that 100 former American ambassadors wrote to President Obama, calling the deal a “landmark agreement” and urging Congress to support it. Former U.S. Diplomats Praise Iran Deal:

GenevaMore than 100 former American ambassadors wrote to President Obama on Thursday praising the nuclear deal reached with Iran this week as a “landmark agreement” that could be effective in halting Tehran’s development of a nuclear weapon, and urging Congress to support it. American Ambassadors Letter (.pdf).

“If properly implemented, this comprehensive and rigorously negotiated agreement can be an effective instrument in arresting Iran’s nuclear program and preventing the spread of nuclear weapons in the volatile and vitally important region of the Middle East,” said the letter, whose signers include diplomats named by presidents of both parties.

They wrote that they recognized the deal “is not a perfect or risk-free settlement of this problem.”

“However,” they added, “we believe that without it, the risks to the security of the United States and our friends and allies would be far greater.”

The accord, they continued, “deserves congressional support and the opportunity to show it can work.”

* * *

Signers of the letter, spearheaded by the Iran Project, a New York-based organization that is dedicated to “a peaceful resolution to the nuclear standoff,” include prominent retired diplomats appointed by Mr. Obama and his Republican and Democratic predecessors.

Read more

‘I’m not a scientist’ goes double for nuclear science, Republicans

When it comes to climate science, Tea-Publicans always begin with “I’m not a scientist ….” Why Republicans Keep Telling Everyone They’re Not a Scientist:

For now, “I’m not a scientist” is what one party adviser calls “a temporary Band-Aid” — a way to avoid being called a climate change denier but also to sidestep a dilemma. The reality of campaigning is that a politician who acknowledges that burning coal and oil contributes to global warming must offer a solution, which most policy experts say should be taxing or regulating carbon pollution and increasing government spending on alternative energy. But those ideas are anathema to influential conservative donors like the billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch and the advocacy group they support, Americans for Prosperity.

John McCain’s puppet boy, Little Lindsey Graham, took a shot at Republican climate change deniers on Tuesday night, throwing the “I’m not a scientist” line back at those in his own party who he said stubbornly refuse to believe scientists. Graham Throws ‘Not A Scientist’ Line Back At GOP Climate Change Deniers:

“Late Night” host Seth Meyers asked Graham, who has previously urged his GOP colleagues to break from the party on environmental issues, if he’s “surprised” to find so many climate change deniers in the party’s ranks.

Well I’m not a scientist,” Graham responded. “but here’s the problem I’ve got with some people in my party: When you ask the scientists what’s going on, why don’t you believe them? If I went to 10 doctors and nine said, ‘Hey, you’re gonna die,’ and one says ‘You’re fine,’ why would I believe the one guy?

Remember, Little Lindsey Graham said this on “Late Night” with Seth Meyers Tuesday night after he had just spent the entire day on Tuesday criticizing the P5+1 world powers nuclear agreement with Iran without having even reviewed the details of the agreement. Graham: Iran Deal ‘Akin to Declaring War’ on Israel:

Lindsey Graham“My initial impression is that this deal is far worse than I ever dreamed it could be and will be a nightmare for the region, our national security and eventually the world at large,” Graham told me in an interview early Tuesday morning, just after Iran, China, France, Russia, Britain, the U.S. and Germany confirmed they had reached terms for a historic deal to limit Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

Read more

P5+1 world powers reach nuclear agreement with Iran

The big news today is that the P5+1 world powers and Iran have reached an historic nuclear agreement. The New York Times headline: IRAN AND 6 WORLD POWERS REACH DEAL TO CURB ITS NUCLEAR PLANS; the Washington Post headline, Historic Iran nuclear deal reached.

Here is a link to the The Full Text of The Nuclear Agreement (Scribd). The White House’s overview is online here.

Geneva
PHOTO: World leaders pose for a group picture at the United Nations building in Vienna (ABC News)

In the days, weeks and months leading up to this historic agreement, there has been knee-jerk opposition to any deal, or even  any negotiations, from the usual suspects: Neocon war mongers in the military-industrial-congressional-media complex that President Eisenhower warned us about, Neocons who opposed President Reagan’s nuclear arms control agreements with the Soviet Union, and who opposed every arms agreement by every president during the nuclear era.

Charles Pierce at Esquire makes a smart point, The Nuclear Deal With Iran, Explained:

Ever since the end of World War II, and the rise of what Garry Wills calls the “Bomb Power” in our politics, any arms-control treaty faced the same opposition on the same grounds from most of the same people. (If you compare Reagan to Chamberlain, you truly have wandered far from the rest of the pack.) Our groaning and bloated arsenal has become such an essential part of our national identity that a) we can’t imagine defining America without it, and b) we can’t imagine that any other country doesn’t feel the same way. The idea that our 4800-odd nuclear weapons — and god alone knows how many chemical and biological weapons we may have — might scare our enemies somehow is construed as weakness because our enemies are always all-powerful and always one small step away from destroying us and taking over the world because an Exceptional Nation requires Exceptional Enemies, and because our arsenal exists largely to protect our lamb-like innocence in a world of wolves.

Read more

But do go on about Iran, neo-cons

Crossposted from DemocraticDiva.com

Shirtless Putin

I was working on a post about another topic when I saw a link to this long-read article from Vox, which is terrifying. I’m still in the process of reading it and may be a while at it since I have to stop very often to wince, cover my eyes, and pace nervously around the room.

We’ve got a real nuclear threat in the world, and it ain’t Iran.

Read more