Second in a multi-part Series
After my “Thucky and Dang” post, Dang lost interest, but Thucky became my new pen pal. We were still early on in our “relationship,” and I still had hopes that logic could reach him, a hope that ultimately was dashed.
I wrote a lengthy post, Conflating Inequality and Unemployment, in which I tried, with zero success, to explain to the Thuckmeister that inequality in America was a problem far greater in scope than unemployment. My motivation for the effort was that each time I wrote a post on inequality, Thucky would use the comment section to repeat conservative talking points on job creation. The thoughtless repetition of talking points was not surprising, but his comments made it apparent that he thought unemployment and inequality were the same issue.
Soon thereafter, Thuckbrain showed me his true colors in a comment to one of my posts on inequality:
The typical poor person in America has a flat screen tv, cable, air conditioning, a cell phone and an automobile. Immoral? You can live well if you are poor and if you are rich but it is cheaper if you are poor and you have a luxury the rich do not have: time.
Wow! Unbeknownst to me, he’d already made his now infamous “lazy pigs” comment months earlier, but it was to another writer’s post, so this was my introduction to how “the poor live well” in Thuckyland.